Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T17:49:50.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Diffusion as A Limiting Factor of a-SiGe Crystallization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

F. Edelman
Affiliation:
Faculty of Materials Engineering, Technion, 32000 Haifa, Israel, edelmann@tx.technion.ac.il
T. Raz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Materials Engineering, Technion, 32000 Haifa, Israel, edelmann@tx.technion.ac.il
Y. Komem
Affiliation:
Faculty of Materials Engineering, Technion, 32000 Haifa, Israel, edelmann@tx.technion.ac.il
P. Werner
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute of Microstructure Physics, Weinberg 2.D-06120 Halle/Saale, Germany
W. Beyer
Affiliation:
Institute of Thin Film and Ion Technology, Research Centre, D-52425 Jiilich, Germany
R. Butz
Affiliation:
Institute of Thin Film and Ion Technology, Research Centre, D-52425 Jiilich, Germany
H. Zeindl
Affiliation:
Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Walter-Korsing-Straβe 2, 15230 Frankfurt (Oder), Germany.
P. Zaumseil
Affiliation:
Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Walter-Korsing-Straβe 2, 15230 Frankfurt (Oder), Germany.
Get access

Abstract

Highly doped (∼1018 to 1021cm−3) polycrystalline Si1-xGex films, crystallized from amorphous (a) state at relative low temperatures, are prospective materials in a variety of applications, such as liquid-crystal displays, solar cells and integrated thermoelectric sensors on large-area glass substrates. Since the nature of the grains in the crystallized film defines properties such as carrier mobility, the nucleation and growth process of the a-SiGe films is of fundamental interest. We have studied the crystallization of undoped and highly doped (B or Ga) amorphous SiGe films. The films were deposited by RFCVD or molecular beam on oxidized (001)Si and for TEM study on cleaved NaCl. The incubation time and grain growth rate were studied by means of in situ TEM using a heating stage. The crystallization process in undoped SiGe followed Avrami relationship. An average grain size between 0.1 and 2μm was observed. However, the highly p-doped (with B or Ga) SiGe films crystallized to a stable nanocrystalline structure (grain size <10nm). The process of the a-SiGe crystallization is explained on the basis of self-diffusion. During the first stage, the nucleation of crystals is accompanied with nonequilibrium vacancy generation at the amorphous/crystalline interface. During the second stage, the growth of crystals takes place by vacancy outdiffusion which is hindered by B and Ga interaction with vacancies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. King, T.-J. and Saraswat, K.C., IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, 41, p. 1581 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Sameshima, T. and Usui, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. 258, p. 117 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Tsuo, Y.S., Xu, Y., Ramsay, E.A., Crandall, R.S., Salamon, S.T., Balberg, I., Nelson, B.P., Xiao, Y., and Chen, Y., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1991) 219, p. 769.Google Scholar
4. Van Gerwen, P., Slater, T., Chevrier, J.B., Baert, K., and Mertens, R., Sensors, a. Actuators, A53, p. 325 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Christian, J.W., The Theory of Transformation in Metals and Allovs Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar
6. Spaepen, F., Acta Metallurgica, 26, 1, 167 (1978);Google Scholar
Spaepen, F. and Ternbull, D. in Laser-Solid Interactions and Laser Processing, edited by Ferris, S., Leamy, H.J., and Poate, J.M., N.Y., 1978, p. 7380.Google Scholar
7. Pantelides, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 100, p. 387 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Csepregi, L., Kennedy, E.F., Callagher, T.J., Mayer, J.W., and Sigmon, T.W., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 4, 234 (1977);Google Scholar
Bourgoin, J.C. and Asomosa, R., J. Cryst. Growth, 69, p. 489 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Narayan, J., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 8, 607 (1982);Google Scholar
Germain, P.J., Paesler, M.A., Sayers, D.E., and Zeliama, K., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 13, p. 135 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Olson, G.L. and Roth, J.A., Mater. Sci. Repts. 3, p.1 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Edelman, F., Weil, R., Werner, P., Reiche, M., and Beyer, W., phys. stat. sol, (a)150, p. 407 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Edelman, F., Weil, R., Werner, P., Reiche, M., Schroer, E., Heydenreich, J. and Beyer, W., Solid State Phenomena, 51/52, p. 283 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Edelman, F., Komem, Y., Stölzer, M., Werner, P., and Butz, R. in Semiconducting and Insulating Materials, edited by Fontane, C. (IEEE, Operations Center, Piscataway, NJ, 1996) p. 205210.Google Scholar
14. Edelman, F., Raz, T., Komem, Y., Werner, P., Stölzer, M., Beyer, W., Butz, R., Zeindl, H. and Zaumseil, P., will be published.Google Scholar
15. Haynes, T.E., Antonell, M.J., Lee, C.A., and Jones, K.S., Phys. Rev. B51, p. 7, 762 (1995);Google Scholar
Kringhoj, P. and Elliman, , Phys. Rev Lett. 73, p. 858 (1994).Google Scholar
16. Suh, K.Y. and Lee, H.H., J. Appl. Phys. 80, p. 6, 716 (1996).Google Scholar
17. Maroudas, D. and Pantelides, S.T., Chem. Engng. Sei. 49, p. 3, 001 (1994).Google Scholar
18. Frank, W., Gösele, U., Mehrer, H., and Seeger, A. in Diffusion in Crystalline Solids, edited by Murch, G.E. and Nowick, A. (Academic Press, 1984) p. 63142.Google Scholar
19. Carlsson, J.R.A., Gong, S.F., Li, X.-H., and Hentzell, H.T.G., J. Appl. Phys. 70, p. 4, 857 (1991);Google Scholar
Carlsson, J.R.A., Li, X.-H., Gong, S.F., and Hentzell, H.T.G., J. Appl. Phys. 74, p. 891 (1993).Google Scholar
20. Damson, B. and Wiirschum, R., J. Appl. Phys. 80, p. 747 (1996);Google Scholar
Battezzati, L. and Baricco, M., Pnil. Mag. B68, p. 813 (1993);Google Scholar
Kronmüller, H., Frank, W. and Hörner, A., Mater. Sci. Engng. A133, p. 410 (1991).Google Scholar
21. Mayburg, S. and Rotondi, L., Phys. Rev. 91, p. 1,015 (1953);Google Scholar
Schwoebel, R.L., J. Appl. Phys. 38, p. 3,154 (1967).Google Scholar