Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:18:22.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Overlapping energy bands and the theory of collective electron ferromagnetism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

A. B. Lidiard
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical PhysicsKing's College, London, W.C. 2*

Abstract

The theory of collective electron ferromagnetism given by Stoner applies to a system of electrons in a single energy band; for iron, cobalt and nickel this is identified with the band of states derived from atomic 3d functions. To bring in the generally assumed overlapping of the 3d band by the wide 4s band in these metals, the theory has been extended to take account of the transfer of electrons from 3d to 4s states with change of temperature. A previous calculation of this transfer effect must be regarded as inadequate, for the part played by the exchange energy in determining the distribution of electrons between the two sets of states was omitted. The general equations are derived in § 2 and used as a basis for discussion of the properties of nickel-copper alloys at absolute zero in § 3. In §§4 and 5 numerical results are presented which show the effect of the overlapping 4s band on the magnetic properties of a system such as nickel both above and below its Curie point. Comparison with the measured paramagnetic susceptibility of pure nickel above the Curie point strongly suggests that for this metal the overlapping 4s band has only a minor influence, although in principle the effect could be very large (cf. Fig. 4). This result is not unambiguous, however, because values thus inferred for the two unknown parameters lead to inaccurate predictions below the Curie point. First, the predicted values for the spontaneous magnetization are too small. Secondly, the theory demands that the nickel-copper alloys should only be ferromagnetic below a copper content of about 20 %, whereas experimentally the limit is known to be about 60 %. In conclusion, it is suggested that the implicit assumption of Stoner's theory that the exchange integrals between all pairs of 3d states are equal to one another is a more serious restriction on the theory than the consideration of only a single energy band.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Band, W.Proc. Comb. phil. Soc. 42 (1945), 139 and 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Bell, G. M.Phil. Mag. (7), 43 (1952), 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Fowler, R. H. and Guggenheim, E. A.Statistical thermodynamics (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar
(4)Lidiard, A. B.Proc. phys. Soc. Lond. A, 64 (1951), 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)McDougall, J. and Stoner, E. C.Philos. Trans. A, 237 (1938), 67.Google Scholar
(6)Schrödinger, E.Statistical thermodynamics (Cambridge, 1946).Google Scholar
(7)Seitz, F.Modern theory of solids (New York, 1940).Google Scholar
(8)Slater, J. C.Phys. Rev. (2), 49 (1936), 537.Google Scholar
(9)Stoner, E. C.Philos. Trans. A, 235 (1937), 165.Google Scholar
(10)Stoner, E. C.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 165 (1938), 372.Google Scholar
(11)Stoner, E. C.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 169 (1939), 339.Google Scholar
(12)Stoner, E. C.Rep. Progr. Phys. 11 (19461947), 43.Google Scholar
(13)Stoner, E. C.J. Phys. Radium, 12 (1951), 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Sucksmith, W. and Pearce, R. R.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 167 (1938), 189.Google Scholar
(15)Van Vleck, J. H.Rev. mod. Phys. 17 (1945), 27.Google Scholar
(16)Weiss, P. and Forrer, R.Ann. Phys., Paris, 5 (1926), 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Wohlfarth, E. P.Proc. phys. Soc. Lond. 60 (1948), 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Wohlfarth, E. P.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 195 (1949), 434.Google Scholar
(19)Wohlfarth, E. P.Phil. Mag. (7), 40 (1949), 1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Wohlfarth, E. P.Phil. Mag. (7), 42 (1951), 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar