Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:45:20.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On random polynomials over finite fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Richard Arratia ,
A. D. Barbour  and
Simon Tavaré
Richard Arratia
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1113, U.S.A.
A. D. Barbour
Affiliation:
Institut für Angewandte Mathematik, Universität Zurich, Rämistrasse 74, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland
Simon Tavaré
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1113, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider random monic polynomials of degree n over a finite field of q elements, chosen with all qn possibilities equally likely, factored into monic irreducible factors. More generally, relaxing the restriction that q be a prime power, we consider that multiset construction in which the total number of possibilities of weight n is qn. We establish various approximations for the joint distribution of factors, by giving upper bounds on the total variation distance to simpler discrete distributions. For example, the counts for particular factors are approximately independent and geometrically distributed, and the counts for all factors of sizes 1, 2, …, b, where b = O(n/log n), are approximated by independent negative binomial random variables. As another example, the joint distribution of the large factors is close to the joint distribution of the large cycles in a random permutation. We show how these discrete approximations imply a Brownian motion functional central limit theorem and a Poisson-Dirichiet limit theorem, together with appropriate error estimates. We also give Poisson approximations, with error bounds, for the distribution of the total number of factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 114 , Issue 2 , September 1993 , pp. 347 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arratia, R. A. and Tavaré, S.. Independent process approximations for random combinatorial structures. Advances in Mathematics (1993). (In the press.)Google Scholar
[2]Arratia, R. A., Barbour, A. D. and Tavaré, S.. Poisson process approximations for the Ewens Sampling Formula. Ann. Appl. Prob. 2 (1992), 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Barbour, A. D.. Comment on a paper of Arratia, Goldstein and Gordon. Statistical Science (1990), 425–427.Google Scholar
[4]Barbour, A. D., Holst, L. and Janson, S.. Poisson approximation. Oxford University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Car, M.. Factorization dans Fq(X). C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I. 294 (1982), 147–150.Google Scholar
[6]Car, M.. Ensembles de polynômes irréductibles et théorèmes de densité. Acta Arith. 44 (1984), 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Csörgo˝, M. and Révész, P.. Strong approximation in probability and statistics. Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
[8]de Laurentis, J. M. and Pittel, B. G.. Random permutations and Brownian motion. Pacific J. Math. 119 (1985), 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Diaconis, P. and Pitman, J. W.. Unpublished lecture notes. Statistics Department, University of California, Berkeley (1986).Google Scholar
[10]Diaconis, P., McGrath, M. and Pitman, J. W.. Cycles and descents of random permutations. Preprint (1992).Google Scholar
[11]Donnelly, P. and Joyce, P.. Continuity and weak convergence of ranked and size-biassed permutations on an infinite simplex. Stoch. Proc. Applns 31 (1989), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Feller, W.. The fundamental limit theorems in probability. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (1945), 800–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Feller, W.. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. Vol I. Wiley, New York, 1950.Google Scholar
[14]Flajolet, P. and Soria, M.. Gaussian limiting distributions for the number of components in combinatorial structures. J. Comb. Th. A 53 (1990), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Gessel, I. M. and Reutenauer, C.. Counting permutations with given cycle structure and descent set. Preprint (1991).Google Scholar
[16]Hansen, J.. Order statistics for decomposable combinatorial structures. Preprint (1991).Google Scholar
[17]Kolchin, V. F.. Random mappings. Optimization Software, Inc., New York, 1986.Google Scholar
[18]Komlós, J., Major, P. and Tusnády, G.. An approximation of partial sums of independent RV-s, and the sample DF. I, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Geb. 32 (1975), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Kurtz, T. G.. Strong approximation theorems for density dependent Markov chains. Stoch. Proc. Applns 6 (1978), 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Lidl, R. and Niederreiter, H.. Introduction to finite fields and their applications. Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
[21]Metropolis, N. and Rota, G.-C.. Witt vectors and the algebra of necklaces. Adv. Math. 50 (1983), 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Metropolis, N. and Rota, G.-C.. The cyclotomic identity. In Contemporary Mathematics 34, (American Mathematical Society, 1984), pp. 19–27.Google Scholar
[23]Rachev, S. T.. Probability metrics and the stability of stochastic models. Wiley, 1991.Google Scholar
[24]Rényi, A.. Théorie des elements saillants d'une suite d'observations. Coll. Comb. Meth. Prob. Th. Mathematisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet (1962), 104–115.Google Scholar
[25]Shepp, L. A. and Lloyd, S. P.. Ordered cycle lengths in a random permutation. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 121 (1966), 340–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Vershik, A. M. and Shmidt, A. A.. Limit measures arising in the theory of groups I. Theor. Prob. Applns 22 (1977), 79–85.Google Scholar