Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-7qpfz Total loading time: 0.456 Render date: 2022-11-27T17:07:31.313Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Ownership and M&A Performance in a Transitional Economy: The Case of the Chinese Real Estate Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

Hongyan Yang
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China
Jing Ru
Affiliation:
Peking University, China
Ting Ren
Affiliation:
Peking University, China

Abstract

In a transitional economy such as China's, when resources are unevenly distributed across different sectors, the disadvantaged sector may seek a growth path that bypasses resource constraints. We investigated this phenomenon in the context of the Chinese real estate industry. By comparing the post–merger and acquisition (M&A) performance of acquiring firms between state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and privately-owned enterprises (POEs), we attempted to show that POEs are better performers in the market should they be granted equitable resources, and the superior performance is strengthened by market-oriented institutional environment. We used M&A events data of publicly listed real estate firms in China from 2004 to 2012, in conjunction with firm characteristics and province-level market environment data. We found the results to be consistent with our hypotheses. In particular, compared to SOEs, privately-owned acquiring firms tend to have better post-M&A performance when both the regions of the acquirer and the target have high level of marketization. The results suggest that the private sector in China's transitional economy is potentially more efficient than the state-owned sector, as long as the market environment is favorable.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agrawal, A., Jaffe, J. F., & Mandelker, A. N. 1992. The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: A re-examination of an anomaly. Journal of Finance, 47 (4): 16051621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. 2005. Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77 (1): 57116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, S. H., Gandell, J., Yortis, H., Proper, S., & Jobin, F. 2000. Anatomy of a merger: Behavior of organizational factors and processes throughout the pre-during-post-stages (part 1). Management Decision, 38 (9): 649662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aybar, B., & Ficici, A. 2009. Cross-border acquisitions and firm value: An analysis of emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (8): 13171338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkema, H., & Vermeulen, G. 1998. International expansion through start-up or through acquisition: An organizational learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1): 726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32 (10): 12311241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A., & Grinstein, Y. 2005. Firm expansion and CEO pay. Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 533; Johnson School Research Paper No. 27-06.Google Scholar
Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. 1995. The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (S1): 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1996. A theory of privatization. Economic Journal, 106: 309319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, D. M. 2005. Multinational acquisition integration: The role of national culture in creating synergies. International Business Review, 14 (3): 269288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouthers, K. D., & Bamossy, G. J. 1997. The role of key stakeholders in international joint venture negotiations: Case studies from Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 28: 285308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, R. F. 2002. Does M&A pay? A survey of evidence for the decision-maker. Journal of Applied Finance, 12 (1): 4868.Google Scholar
Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 499518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capron, L., & Guillén, M. 2009. National corporate governance institutions and post-acquisition target reorganization. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (8): 803833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, C. M., Makino, S., & Isobe, T. 2010. Does subnational region matter? Foreign affiliate performance in the United States and China. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (11): 12261243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clougherty, J. 2005. Antitrust holdup, cross-national institutional variation, and corporate political strategy implications for domestic mergers in a global context. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (8): 769790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. 2000. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26 (1): 3161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, C. 2003. Land policy reform in China: Assessment and prospects. Land Use Policy, 20 (2): 109120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, K. M., Reus, T. H., & Lamont, B. T. 2009. The effects of procedural and informational justice in the integration of related acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 137161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrin, S., & Perotin, V. 1991. Does ownership always matter? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9 (1): 5572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., & McConnell, J. J. 2006. Political connections and corporate bailouts. Journal of Finance, 61 (6): 25972635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, G., Wang, X., & Zhu, H. 2010. NERI index of marketization of China provinces 2009 report (in Chinese). Beijing: Economic Science Press.Google Scholar
Frydman, R., Hessel, M. P., & Rapaczynski, A. 1998. Why ownership matters? Politicization and entrepreneurship in the restructuring of enterprises in Central Europe. Economic Research Reports No. 98–14, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.Google Scholar
Frye, T., & Shleifer, A. 1997. The invisible hand and the grabbing hand. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 87 (2): 354358.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A., & Zammuto, R. F. 2005. Institutional governance systems and variations in national competitive advantage: An integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 30 (4): 823842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanke, S. H. 1987. The necessity of property rights. In Hanke, S. H. (Ed.), Privatization and development: 4751. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Hayward, M. L. A. 2002. When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990–1995. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, M. L. A., & Hambrick, D. C. 1997. Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1): 103127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, C. 2002. Information costs, agglomeration economies and the location of foreign direct investment in China. Regional Studies, 36 (9): 10291036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, S. P. S., & Lin, G. C. S. 2003. Emerging land markets in rural and urban China: Policies and practices. China Quarterly, 175: 681707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 249267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karim, S., & Mitchell, W. 2000. Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10): 10611081.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. 1988. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 570598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 2000. Did socialism fail to innovate? A natural experiment of the two Zeiss companies. American Sociological Review, 65 (2): 169190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornai, J. 1986. The soft budget constraint. Kyklos, 39 (1): 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornai, J., Maskin, E., & Roland, G. 2003. Understanding the soft budget constraint. Journal of Economic Literature, 41 (4): 10951136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopea-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52: 11311150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, C. M., & Bruton, G. D. 2008. FDI in China: What we know and what we need to study next. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22 (4): 3044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. H., Peng, M. W., & Barney, J. B. 2007. Bankruptcy law and entrepreneurship development: A real options perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32 (1): 257272.Google Scholar
Li, K., Yue, H., & Zhao, L. 2009. Ownership, institutions, and capital structure: Evidence from China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37 (3): 471490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., & Xia, J. 2008. The roles and performance of state firms and nonstate firms in China's economic transition. World Development, 36: 3954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Xia, J., Long, C. X., & Tan, J. 2012. Control modes and outcomes of transformed state-owned enterprises in China: An empirical test. Management and Organization Review, 8 (2): 283309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, E. B., & Ross, S. A. 1981. Tobin's Q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business, 54: 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockett, A., Thompson, S., & Morgenstern, U. 2009. The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11 (1): 928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., & Tan, J. J. 1998. A comparison of multinational and domestic firms in an emerging market: A strategic choice perspective. Journal of International Management, 4 (1): 2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Wang, S. L. 2012. Guanxi and organizational performance: a meta-analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8 (1): 139172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. 2002. The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (3): 153170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megginson, W. L. 2005. Financial economics of privatization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. 2009. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (1): 6180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. V. 2005. Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 6393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M. W. 2011. Is it capitalism? Management and Organization Review, 7 (1): 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micklethwait, J. 2011. Taming Leviathan: A special report on the future of the state. Economist Newspaper.Google Scholar
Moeller, S. B., & Schlingemann, F. P. 2005. Global diversification and bidder gains: A comparison between cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29 (3), 533564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netter, J., & Megginson, W. 2001. From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39 (2): 321389.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. V., Le, N. T. B., & Bryant, S. E. 2013. Sub-national institutions, firm strategies, and firm performance: A multilevel study of private manufacturing firms in Vietnam. Journal of World Business, 48 (1): 6876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (9): 697713.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C., & Holzinger, I. 2008. The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33 (2): 496520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S. H., Li, S., & Tse, D. K. 2006. Market liberalization and firm performance during China's economic transition. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (1), 127147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 275296.Google Scholar
Peng, M. W. 2006. Making M&A fly in China. Harvard Business Review, 84 (3): 2627.Google Scholar
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43:486501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W., Tan, J., & Tong, T. W. 2004. Ownership types and strategic groups in an emerging economy. Journal of Management Studies, 41 (7): 11051129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. 2009. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23 (3): 6381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W., Wang, D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39: 920936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peteraf, M., & Bergen, M. 2003. Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: A market-based and resource-based framework. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10): 10271041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramamurti, R. 2000. A multilevel model of privatization in emerging economies. Academy of Management Review, 25 (3): 525550.Google Scholar
Roll, R. 1986. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59: 197216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, J. C., Ferreira, M. P., Reis, N. R., & Almeida, M. R. 2012. Mergers and acquisitions research: A bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals. globADVANTAGE Center of Research in International Business and Strategy Working Paper No. 91.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1998. The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. 2007. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32 (1): 273292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, G. K., & Sitkin, S. B. 2005. Trust in mergers and acquisitions. In: Stahl, G. K. & Mendenhall, M. (Eds.), Mergers and acquisitions: Managing culture and human resources: 82102. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Steensma, H. K., & Yang, H. 2013. The influence of state ownership on innovation in market competition. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013 (1): 15283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Q., Tong, W. H., & Tong, J. 2002. How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China's privatization experience. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29: 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, J. 2002. Impact of ownership type on environment, strategy, and performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (3): 333354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, J., Li, S., & Xia, J. 2007. When iron fist, visible hand, and invisible hand meet: Firm-level effects of varying institutional environments in China. Journal of Business Research, 60 (7): 786794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, L., & Estrin, S. 2008. Retained state shareholding in Chinese PLCs: Does government ownership always reduce corporate value? Journal of Comparative Economics, 36 (1): 7489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, L., & Ma, W. 2009. Government intervention in city development of China: A tool of land supply. Land Use Policy, 26 (3): 599609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, K. Y. 2005. Local tax system, intergovernmental transfers and China's local fiscal disparities. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33 (1): 173196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlenbruck, K., & De Castro, J. O. 2000. Foreign acquisitions in Central and Eastern Europe: Outcomes of privatization in transitional economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 381402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaaler, P. M., & Schrage, B. N. 2009. Residual state ownership, policy stability and financial performance following strategic decisions by privatizing telecoms. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (4): 621641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. 2001. Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (3): 457476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, M. M. 2000. Corporate takeovers, strategic objectives, and acquiring-firm shareholder wealth. Financial Management, 29 (1): 5366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, W. P. 2005. Country resource environments, firm capabilities, and corporate diversification strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 161182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2): 171180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 26 (1): 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, C. 2000. Central-local relations revisited: The 1994 tax sharing reform and public expenditure management in China. China Perspectives, 31: 5263.Google Scholar
Xu, C. 2011. The fundamental institutions of China's reforms and development. Journal of Economic Literature, 49 (4): 10761151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, L. C., Zhu, T., & Lin, Y. M. 2005. Politician control, agency problems and ownership reform. Economics of Transition, 13 (1): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. 2008. What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies? Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 32 (1): 5982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Zhou, C., & Ebbers, H. 2011. Completion of Chinese overseas acquisitions: Institutional perspectives and evidence. International Business Review, 20 (2): 226238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y. 2012. Institutional sources of reform: The diffusion of land banking systems in China. Management and Organization Review, 8 (3): 507533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Yang supplementary material

Translated abstracts

Download Yang supplementary material(File)
File 14 KB
10
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Ownership and M&A Performance in a Transitional Economy: The Case of the Chinese Real Estate Industry
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Ownership and M&A Performance in a Transitional Economy: The Case of the Chinese Real Estate Industry
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Ownership and M&A Performance in a Transitional Economy: The Case of the Chinese Real Estate Industry
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *