Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

MICROPRODUCTION FUNCTIONS WITH UNIQUE COEFFICIENTS AND ERRORS: A RECONSIDERATION AND RESPECIFICATION

  • P.A.V.B. Swamy (a1), G.S. Tavlas (a2) and S.G. Hall (a3)

Abstract

Estimated microproduction functions confront two major problems—those of (1) unknown functional forms and (2) the measurement of capital independent of the distribution of output among the factors of production. The latter problem has emerged unresolved from the earlier Cambridge capital controversy. In the presence of these two problems, all specifications of microproduction functions have involved nonunique coefficients and error terms. We provide a method of deriving time-varying coefficients that produces unique coefficients and error terms. Specifically, we respecify the microproduction function in such a way that its coefficients are the sums of (i) the appropriate partial derivatives and (ii) exact representations of excluded-variable biases. By decomposing the total coefficients, we obtain the unique coefficients and a unique error term. Our treatment of heterogeneous capital is not subject to the criticisms of that concept that emerged during the Cambridge controversy.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence to: Swamy Paravastu, Retired, 6333 Brocketts Crossing, Kingstowne, VA 22315, USA; e-mail: swamyparavastu@hotmail.com.

References

Hide All
Basmann, R.L. (1988) Causality tests and observationally equivalent representations of econometric models. Journal of Econometrics 39, 69104.
Blazek, D. and Sickles, R.C. (2010) The impact of knowledge accumulation and geographical spillovers on productivity and efficiency: The case of U. S. shipbuilding during WWII. Economic Modelling 27, 14841497.
Clarida, R., Gali, J., and Gertler, M. (1999) The science of monetary policy: A New-Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 37, 16611707.
Cohen, A.J. and Harcourt, G.C. (2003) Whatever happened to the Cambridge capital theory controversies? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17, 199214.
Diewert, W.E. (1971) An application of the Shephard duality theorem: Generalized Leontief production function. Journal of Political Economy 79, 481507.
Felipe, J. and Fisher, F.M. (2003) Aggregation in production functions: What applied economists should know. Metroeconomica 54, 208262.
Fisher, F.M. (2005) Aggregate production functions—A pervasive, but unpersuasive, fairytale. Eastern Economic Journal 31, 489491.
Garegnani, P. (1970) Heterogeneous capital, the production function and the theory of distribution. Review of Economic Studies 37, 407436.
Garegnani, P. (1990) Quantity of capital. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P. (eds.), The New Palgrave: Capital Theory, pp. 178. London: Macmillan.
Greene, W.H. (2008) Econometric Analysis, 6th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Griliches, Z. (1977) Estimating the returns to schooling: Some econometric problems. Econometrica 45, 122.
Hall, S.G., Hondroyiannis, G., Kenjegaliev, A., Swamy, P.A.V.B., and Tavlas, G.S. (in press) Is the relationship between prices and exchange rates homogenous? Journal of International Money and Finance.
Hall, S.G., Kenjegaliev, A., Swamy, P.A.V.B., and Tavlas, G.S. (2013a) Measuring currency pressures: The cases of the Japanese yen, the Chinese yuan, and the U.K. pound. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 29, 120.
Hall, S.G., Kenjegaliev, A., Swamy, P.A.V.B., and Tavlas, G.S. (2013b) The forward rate premium puzzle: A case of misspesification? Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 17, 265281.
Harcourt, G.C. (2007) The relevance of the Cambridge–Cambridge controversies in capital theory for econometrics practice. In Arestis, P., Baddeley, M., and McCombie, J.S.L. (eds.), Economic Growth: New Directions in Theory and Policy, pp. 117135. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Kydland, F. and Prescott, E. (1982) Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 50, 13451371.
Laing, D., Li, V., and Wang, P. (2013) Decentralized exchange and factor payments: A multiple-matching approach. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17, 5488.
Lazzarini, A. (2008) The Cambridge Capital Controversy in Historical Perspective and Some Unsettled Analytical Issues. Unpublished manuscript.
McDonald, S. and Zhang, J. (2012) Income inequality and economic growth with altruistic bequests and human capital investment. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16, 331354.
Moro, A. (2012) Biased technical change, intermediate goods and total factor productivity. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16, 184203.
Pasinetti, L. and Scazzieri, R. (2008) Capital theory (paradoxes). In Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 675683. London: MacMillan.
Pearl, J. (2000) Causality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Petri, F. (2004) General Equilibrium, Capital and Macroeconomics. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Photphisutthiphong, N. and Weder, M. (2012) A note on capital–labor substitution, sector-specific externalities and indeterminacy. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16, 411421.
Pratt, J.W. and Schlaifer, R. (1984) On the nature and discovery of structure. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, 9–21, 2933.
Pratt, J.W. and Schlaifer, R. (1988) On the interpretation and observation of laws. Journal of Econometrics, Annals 39, 2352.
Robinson, J. (1953–1954) The production function and the theory of capital. Review of Economic Studies 21, 81106.
Samuelson, P.A. (1962) Parable and realism in capital theory: The surrogate production function. Review of Economic Studies 29, 193206.
Samuelson, P.A. (1966) A summing up. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 568583.
Skyrms, B. (1988) Probability and causation. Journal of Econometrics, Annals 39, 5368.
Sraffa, P. (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sraffa, P. (1961) Comment. In Lutz, F.A. and Hague, D.C. (eds.), The Theory of Capital, pp. 305306, 325–326. London: Macmillan.
Swamy, P.A.V.B. and Hall, S.G. (2012) Measurement of causal effects. Economic Change and Restructuring 45, 323.
Swamy, P.A.V.B., Mehta, J.S., Tavlas, G.S., and Hall, S.G.F. (in press) Small area estimation with correctly specified linking models. In Ma, J. and Wohar, M.E. (eds.), Recent Advances in Estimating Nonlinear Models. New York: Springer.
Swamy, P.A.V.B. and Tavlas, G.S. (2005) Theoretical conditions under which monetary policies are effective and practical obstacles to their verification. Economic Theory 25, 9991005.
Swamy, P.A.V.B. and Tavlas, G.S. (2007) The New Keynesian Phillips curve and inflation expectations: Re-specification and interpretation. Economic Theory 31, 293306.
Swamy, P.A.V.B., Tavlas, G.S., Hall, S.G.F., and Hondroyiannis, G. (2010) Estimation of parameters in the presence of model misspecification and measurement error. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 14, 133.
Woodford, M. (2003) Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

MICROPRODUCTION FUNCTIONS WITH UNIQUE COEFFICIENTS AND ERRORS: A RECONSIDERATION AND RESPECIFICATION

  • P.A.V.B. Swamy (a1), G.S. Tavlas (a2) and S.G. Hall (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.