Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF WEAK IDENTIFICATION IN STOCK PRICE DECOMPOSITIONS

  • Nathan S. Balke (a1), Jun Ma (a2) and Mark E. Wohar (a3)

Abstract

This paper employs the state-space model to reexamine the fundamental issue in finance of whether it is the expected returns or the expected dividends growth that is primarily responsible for stock price variations. We use Bayesian methods to show that there is a substantial uncertainty about the contributions of expected returns and expected dividends to fluctuations in the price–dividend ratio when the aggregate returns and dividends data are used. The substantial uncertainty of the contributions results from the model being weakly identified. Our finding challenges the notion long held in the existing literature that it is the expected returns that contribute most to price–dividend variations.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence to: Jun Ma, Department of Economics, Finance and Legal Studies, Culverhouse College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0024, USA; e-mail: jma@cba.ua.edu.

References

Hide All
Balke, Nathan S. and Wohar, Mark E. (2002) Low frequency movements in stock prices: A state-space decomposition. Review of Economics and Statistics 84, 649667.
Balke, Nathan S. and Wohar, Mark E. (2006) What drives stock prices? Identifying the determinants of stock price movements. Southern Economic Journal 74, 5578.
Balke, Nathan S. and Wohar, Mark E. (2009) Market fundamentals versus rational bubbles in stock prices: A Bayesian perspective. Journal of Applied Econometrics 24, 3575.
Bansal, Ravi and Yaron, Amir (2004) Risks for the long-run: A potential resolution of the asset pricing puzzles. Journal of Finance 59, 14811509.
Binsbergen, Jules H. van and Ralph S.J. Koijen (2010) Predictive regressions: A present-value approach. Journal of Finance 65, 14391471.
Callen, Jeffrey L. and Segal, Dan (2004) Do accruals drive firm-level stock returns? A variance decomposition analysis. Journal of Accounting Research 43, 377412.
Campbell, John Y. (1991) A variance decomposition for stock returns. Economic Journal 101, 157179.
Campbell, John Y. and Ammer, John (1993) What moves the stock and bond markets? A variance decomposition for long-term asset returns. Journal of Finance 48, 337.
Campbell, John Y. and Cochrane, J.H. (1999) By force of habit: A consumption-based aggregate explanation of stock market behavior. Journal of Political Economy 107, 205251.
Campbell, John Y. and Shiller, Robert (1988a) The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Review of Financial Studies 1, 195228.
Campbell, John Y. and Shiller, Robert (1988b) Stock prices, earnings, and expected dividends. Journal of Finance 43, 661676.
Carter, Christopher K. and Kohn, Robert (1994) On Gibbs sampling for state-space models. Biometrika 81, 541553.
Chen, Long (2009) On the reversal of return and dividend growth predictability: A tale of two periods. Journal of Financial Economics 92, 128151.
Chen, Long, Da, Zhi, and Zhao, Xinlei (2013) What drives stock price movements? Review of Financial Studies 26, 841876.
Chen, Long and Zhao, Xinlei (2009) Return decomposition. Review of Financial Studies 22, 52135249.
Cochrane, John (1992) Explaining the variance of price-dividend ratios. Review of Financial Studies 5, 243280.
Cochrane, John (2008) The dog that did not bark: A defense of return predictability. Review of Financial Studies 21, 15331575.
Cuthbertson, Keith, Haves, Simon, and Nitzsche, Dirk (1999) Explaining movements in UK stock prices. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 39, 119.
Goyal, Amit and Welch, Ivo (2008) A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction. Review of Financial Studies 21, 14551508.
Hansen, Lars P., Heaton, John C., and Li, Nan (2008) Consumption strikes back? Measuring long-run risk. Journal of Political Economy 116, 260302.
Kim, Chang-Jin and Nelson, Charles R. (1999) State-Space Models with Regime Switching: Classical and Gibbs-Sampling Approaches with Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Larrain, Borja and Yogo, Motohiro (2008) Does firm value move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in cash flow? Journal of Financial Economics 87, 200226.
Ma, Jun (2013) Long-run risks and its implications for the equity premium puzzle: New evidence from a multivariate framework. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 45, 121145.
Ma, Jun and Nelson, Charles R. (2012) The Superiority of the LM test in a Class of Models Where the Wald Test Performs Poorly; Including Nonlinear Regression, ARMA, GARCH, and Unobserved Components. Working paper, University of Alabama and University of Washington.
Ma, Jun, Nelson, Charles R., and Startz, Richard (2007) Spurious inference in the GARCH(1,1) model when it is weakly identified. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 11, 127.
Ma, Jun and Wohar, Mark E. (2012) Expected Returns and Expected Dividend Growth: Time to Rethink an Established Empirical Literature. Working paper, University of Alabama and University of Nebraska at Omaha.
Morley, James, Nelson, Charles R., and Zivot, Eric (2003) Why are unobserved component and Beveridge-Nelson trend-cycle decompositions of GDP so different? Review of Economics and Statistics 85, 235243.
Nelson, Charles R. and Kim, Myung J. (1993) Predictable stock returns: The role of small sample bias. Journal of Finance 48, 641661.
Nelson, Charles R. and Schwert, G. William (1977) On testing the hypothesis that the real rate of interest is constant. American Economic Review 67, 478486.
Nelson, Charles R. and Richard Startz (2007) The zero-information-limit condition and spurious inference in weakly identified models. Journal of Econometrics 138, 4762.
Shiller, Robert and Beltratti, Andrea (1992) Stock prices and bond yields. Journal of Monetary Economics 30, 2546.
Vuolteenaho, Tuomo (2002) What drives firm-level stock returns? Journal of Finance 43, 233264.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed