Skip to main content Accessibility help

Cooperative Hegemony and Summitry in the Americas

  • Gordon Mace (a1) and Hugo Loiseau (a2)


As an instrument for governance, summitry is a novel structure for the management of contemporary hemispheric regionalism in the Americas. Such regionalism is a clear case of the “structuralist paradox” of international cooperation. This article attempts to explain the particular asymmetric regionalism in the Americas by using the concept of cooperative hegemony. The underlying hypothesis is that the U.S. government, since 1994, has pursued a strategy of cooperative behavior, at least in regard to power sharing, in two specific phases of hemispheric regionalism: agenda setting and institutionalization. This study tests the hypothesis through a content analysis of the main documents produced at the Miami, Santiago, and Québec summits, then relates these findings to the progress of institutionalization from 1994 to 2003.



Hide All
Baldwin, David A., ed. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
Boehm, Peter M., and Christopher, Hernández-Roy. 1999. Multilateralism in the Americas: Is It Working Canadian Foreign Policy/La politique étrangère du Canada 7, 2 (Winter): 23–34.
Brown, Chris. 2001. Understanding International Relations. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave.
Feinberg, Richard E. 1997. Summitry in the Americas: A Progress Report. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Franko, Patrice M. 2000. Toward a New Security Architecture in the Americas: The Strategic Implications of the FTAA. Washington, DC: CSIS Press.
Grebe López, Horst. 1997. La cumbre de Santa Cruz: un paso hacia el desarrollo sostenible. Nueva Sociedad (May–June): 51–59.
Grieco, Joseph M. 1993. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: a Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. in Baldwin 1993. 116–40.
Habeeb, Mark. 1988. Power and Tactics in International Negotiations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Johnson, Janet, and Joslyn, Richard. 2001. Political Science Research Methods. 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph, S. Nye. 1989. Power and Interdependence. 2nd ed. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.
Leadership Council for Inter-American Summitry. 2001. Advancing Toward Québec City and Beyond. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. March.
Lutz, Ellen L., and Kathryn, Sikkink. 2000. International Human Rights Law and Practice in Latin America. International Organization 54, 3 (Summer): 633–59.
Mace, Gordon, and Louis, Belanger. 1999. The Structural Contexts of Hemispheric Regionalism: Power, Trade, Political Culture and Economic Development. In The Americas in Transition: The Contours of Regionalism, ed. Mace, Belanger, et al. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. 3767.
Milner, Helen. 1993. The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: a Critique. in Baldwin 1993. 143–69.
Organization of American States (OAS). 2001a. Inter-American Democratic Charter. http:www.oas.orgcharterdocsresolutionl_en_p4.htm (Accessed July 12, 2004).
Organization of American States (OAS). 2001b. International Institutions to Implement Summit Mandates Together. Press Release E-137/01. June 21. (Accessed July 12, 2004).
Organization of American States. Committee on Hemispheric Security (Chs). 2001. Defense Ministerial of the Americas, http:www.oas.orgcshenglishdefault.asp (Accessed July 12, 2004).
Paz Barnica, Edgardo. 1996. La cumbre de las Americas y las prosperidad compartida. Madrid: Tecnos.
Pedersen, Thomas. 1998, Germany, France and the Integration of Europe: A Realist Interpretation. London: Cassell/Pinter.
Pedersen, Thomas. 2002. Cooperative Hegemony: Power, Ideas, and Institutions in Regional Integration. Review of International Studies 28: 677–96.
Powell, Robert. 1993. Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory. in Baldwin 1993. 209–33.
QSR International. Qsr Nudist. Software,
Robert, Maryse. 2000. Negotiating NAFTA: Explaining the Outcome in Culture, Textiles, Autos and Pharmaceuticals. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Rosenberg, Robin L. 2001. The Oas and the Summit of the Americas: Coexistence, or Integration of Forces for Multilateralism Latin American Politics and Society 43, 1 (Spring): 79–101.
Salazar-Xirinachs, Jose M., and Maryse, Robert, eds. 2001. Toward Free Trade in the Americas. Vol. 3. Washington, DC: Organization of American States/Brookings Institution Press.
Shamsie, Yasmine. 2000. Engaging with Civil Society: Lessons from the OAS, FTAA and Summits of the Americas. Paper. Ottawa: North-South Institute. January.
Singh, J. P. 2000. Weak Powers and Globalism: the Impact of Plurality on Weak-Strong Negotiations in the International Community. International Negotiations 5: 450–51.
Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Summit of the Americas Information Network. 19942001. Declarations and Plans of Action of summits of 1994, 1998, 2001. http:www.summit-americas.orgList-Summit(new)-Eng.htm (Accessed July 12, 2004).
Summit of the Americas Information Network. 2001. Québec Summit Plan of Action, 2001 and Follow-up to the Plan of Action, (Accessed July 12, 2004).
Tokatlian, Juan Gabriel. 1994. The Miami Summit and Drugs: a Placid, Innocuous Conference Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 36, 3 (Fall): 75–91.
Weber, Robert Philip. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. 2nd ed. London, Sage.
Zartmann, I. William. 1997. The Structuralist Dilemma in Negociations. Research on Negotiations in Organizations 6: 227–45.
Zartmann, , William, I., and Jeffrey, Z. Rubin. 2000. The Study of Power and the Practice of Negotiation. In Power, and Negotiation, , ed. Zartmann and Rubin. Ann Arbor: University of Michagan Press.
deZela, Hugo. 1998. Ii Cumbre de las Americas, avances y perspectivas. Revista Peruana de Derecho Internacional 48 (January–June): 5364.

Cooperative Hegemony and Summitry in the Americas

  • Gordon Mace (a1) and Hugo Loiseau (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed