Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Action in cognition: The case of language

  • Lawrence J. Taylor (a1) and Rolf A. Zwaan (a1)

Abstract

Empirical research has shown that the processing of words and sentences is accompanied by activation of the brain's motor system in language users. The degree of precision observed in this activation seems to be contingent upon (1) the meaning of a linguistic construction and (2) the depth with which readers process that construction. In addition, neurological evidence shows a correspondence between a disruption in the neural correlates of overt action and the disruption of semantic processing of language about action. These converging lines of evidence can be taken to support the hypotheses that motor processes (1) are recruited to understand language that focuses on actions and (2) contribute a unique element to conceptual representation. This article explores the role of this motor recruitment in language comprehension. It concludes that extant findings are consistent with the theorized existence of multimodal, embodied representations of the referents of words and the meaning carried by language. Further, an integrative conceptualization of “fault tolerant comprehension” is proposed.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence address: Lawrence J. Taylor, Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, NL-3000 DR, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail: Lawrence.John.Taylor@gmail.com.

References

Hide All
Bak, T. H., O'Donovan, D. G., Xuereb, J. H., Boniface, S. & Hodges, J. R.. 2001. Selective impairment of verb processing associated with pathological changes in Brodmann areas 44 and 45 in the motor neuron disease-dementia-aphasia syndrome. Brain 124. 103120.
Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 577609.
Barsalou, L. W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59. 617645.
Beilock, S. L., Lyons, I. M., Mattarella-Micke, A., Nusbaum, H. C. & Small, S. L.. 2008. Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(36). 1326913273.
Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1). 128.
Boulenger, V., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M. & Nazier, T. A.. 2006. Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(10). 16071615.
Boulenger, V., Mechtouff, L., Thobois, S., Broussolle, E., Jeannerod, M. & Nazir, T. A.. in press. Word processing in Parkinson's disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia.
Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J. & Cree, G. S.. 2008. Evocation of functional and volumetric knowledge by objects and words. Cognition 106(1). 2758.
Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V. & Rizzolatti, G.. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research 24(3). 355363.
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grezes, J., Passingham, P. E. & Haggard, P.. 2005. Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex 15. 12431249.
Casasanto, D. & Dijkstra, K.. submitted. Motor action and emotional memory.
Filimon, F., Nelson, J. D., Hagler, D. J. & Sereno, M. I.. 2007. Human cortical representations for reaching: Mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. Neurolmage 37. 13151328.
Fischer, M. H. & Zwaan, R. A.. 2008. Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61. 825850.
Fodor, J. A. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gentilucci, M. & Gangitano, M.. 1998. Influence of automatic word reading on motor control. European Journal of Neuroscience 10. 752756.
Ghazanfar, A. A. & Schroeder, C. E.. 2006. Is neocortex essentially multisensory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10. 278285.
Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. G.. 1996. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 103(4). 650669.
Glenberg, A. M. 1997. What memory is for. Behavioral and brain sciences 20. 155.
Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P.. 2002. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9. 558565.
Glenberg, A. M. & Robertson, D. A.. 1999. Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes 28(1). 126.
Glenberg, A. M. & Robertson, D. A.. 2000. Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43. 379401.
Glover, S. & Dixon, P.. 2002. Semantics afect the planning but not control of grasping. Experimental Brain Research 146. 383387.
Glover, S., Rosenbaum, D. A., Graham, J. & Dixon, P.. 2004. Grasping the meaning of words. Experimental Brain Research 154. 103108.
Harnad, S. 1990. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42. 335346.
Hauk, O., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F.. 2008. The time course of action and action-word comprehension in the human brain as revealed by neurophysiology. Journal of Physiology, Paris 102. 5058.
Hebb, D. O. 1949. The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. John Wiley & Sons.
Hintzman, D. L. 1986. “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 93(4). 411428.
Jackendof, R. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kemmerer, D., Castillo, J. G., Talavage, T., Patterson, S. & Wiley, C.. 2008. Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: Evidence from fMRI. Brain and Language 107(1). 1643.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. 2001. Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 21(2). 143188.
Lindemann, O., Stenneken, P., Schie, H. T. van & Bekkering, H.. 2006. Semantic activation in action planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32. 633643.
MacWhinney, B. 2005. The emergence of grammar from perspective taking. In Pecher, D. & Zwaan, R. A. (eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking, 198223. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mahon, B. Z. & Caramazza, A.. 2008. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Phsysiology, Paris 102. 5970.
Myung, J., Blumstein, S. E. & Sedivy, J. C.. 2006. Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition 98. 223243.
Nakamura, W. 1997. A cognitive approach to English adverbs. Linguistics 35. 247287.
Penfield, W. & Rasmussen, T.. 1950. The cerebral cortex of man. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Postle, N., McMahon, K. L., Ashton, R., Meredith, M. & Zubicaray, G. I. de. in press. Action word meaning representations incytoarchitectonically defined primary and premotor cortices. Neurolmage.
Pulvermüller, F. 2004. Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Human Brain Mapping 21(3). 191204.
Pulvermüller, F. 2005. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6. 576582.
Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V. & Ilmoniemi, R. J.. 2005. Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience 21. 793797.
Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A. & Tyler, L. K.. 2009. Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia 47(2). 388396.
Rüschemeyer, S., Brass, M. & Friederici, A. D.. 2007. Comprehending: Neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19. 855865.
Sato, M., Mengarelli, M., Riggio, L., Gallese, V. & Buccino, G.. 2008. Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing. Brain and Language 105(2). 8390.
Searle, J. R. 1980. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(3). 417457.
Taylor, L. J. & Zwaan, R. A.. 2008. Motor resonance and linguistic focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61. 896904.
Taylor, L. J., Ari, S. Lev & Zwaan, R. A.. 2008. Inferences about action engage action systems. Brain and Language 107(1). 6267.
Tomasino, B., Werner, C. J., Weiss, P. H. & Fink, G. R.. 2007. Stimulus properties matter more than perspective: An fMRI study of mental imagery and silent reading of action phrases. Neuroimage 36. T128T141.
van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W.. 1983. Strategies in discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Zwaan, R. A. 2004. The immersed experiencer: toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In Ross, B. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 3562. New York: Academic Press.
Zwaan, R. A. & Radvansky, G. A.. 1998. Situation models in language and memory. Psychological Bulletin 123. 162185.
Zwaan, R. A. & Taylor, L. J.. 2006. Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135. 111.
Zwaan, R. A., Taylor, L. J. & de Boer, M.. in press. Motor resonance as a function of narrative time: Further tests of the linguistic focus hypothesis. Brain and Language.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed