Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Was Kant a ‘Kantian Constructivist’?

  • Jeremy Schwartz (a1)

Abstract

Both metaethicists and Kant scholars alike use the phrase ‘Kantian constructivism’ to refer to a kind of austere constructivism that holds that substantive ethical conclusions can be derived from the practical standpoint of rational agency as such. I argue that this widespread understanding of Kant is incompatible with Kant’s claim that the Categorical Imperative is a synthetic a priori practical judgement. Taking this claim about the syntheticity of the Categorical Imperative seriously implies that moral judgements follow from extra-logical but necessary principles. These principles have to do not with the laws of practical thinking but the laws of practical thought about an object. I conclude that historical Kant was not what has come to be called a ‘Kantian constructivist’.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Allison, Henry (1973) The Kant-Eberhard Controversy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Allison, Henry (2004) Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Revised and enlarged edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Anderson, Lanier (2004) ‘It Adds up After All: Kant’s Philosophy of Arithmetic in Light of the Traditional Logic’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69, 501540.
Anderson, Lanier (2005) ‘The Wolffian Paradigm and Its Discontents: Kant’s Containment Definition of Analyticity in Historical Context’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 87, 2274.
Bagnoli, Carla (2014) ‘Constructivism in Metaethics’. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (spring 2014 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/constructivism-metaethics.
Bird, Graham (2006) The Revolutionary Kant. Chicago: Open Court.
Copp, David (2013) ‘Is Constructivism an Alternative to Moral Realism?’. In Carla Bagnoli (ed.), Constructivism in Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 108133.
de Jong, W. R. (1995) ‘Kant’s Analytic Judgments and the Traditional Theory of Concepts’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33, 613641.
Dryer, D. P. (1966) Kant’s Solution for Verification in Metaphysics. London: Allen & Unwin.
Engstrom, Stephen (2009) The Form of Practical Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Enoch, David (2006) ‘Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come from What is Constitutive of Action’. Philosophical Review, 115, 169198.
Fitzpatrick, William (2013) ‘How Not to Be an Ethical Constructivist: A Critique of Korsgaard’s Neo-Kantian Constitutivism’. In Carla Bagnoli (ed.), Constructivism in Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 4163.
Formosa, Paul (2013) ‘Is Kant a Moral Constructivist or a Moral Realist?European Journal of Philosophy, 21, 170196.
Gibbard, Alan (2003) Thinking How to Live. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Guyer, Paul (2013) ‘Constructivism and Self-Constitution’. In Mark Timmons, Sorin and Baiasu (eds), Kant on Practical Justification (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 176201.
Hanna, Robert (2001) Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Herman, Barbara (1993) ‘Leaving Deontology Behind’. In Barbara Herman, The Practice of Moral Judgment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 208243.
Kant, Immanuel (1992) Lectures on Logic. Ed. and trans. J. Michael Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy. Ed. and trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel (1998a) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel (1998b) Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. Trans. Allen Wood and George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel (2002) Theoretical Philosophy After 1781 . Ed. Henry Allison, Peter and Heath, trans. Gary Hatfield, Michael Friedman, Henry Allison, and Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine (2008) ‘Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy’. In Christine Korsgaard, The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 302327.
Krasnoff, Larry (2013) ‘Constructing Practical Justification: How Can the Categorical Imperative Justify Desire-Based Actions?’ In Mark Timmons and Sorin Baiasu (eds), Kant on Practical Justification (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 87110.
Lebar, Mark (2013) ‘Constructivism and Particularism’. In Carla Bagnoli (ed.), Constructivism in Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 183201.
Ludwig, Bernd (2006) ‘Kant’s Hypothetical Imperatives (GMS II, 417–419)’. In Christopher Horn and Dieter Schönecker (eds), Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2006), pp. 139158.
MacFarlane, John (2002) ‘Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism’. Philosophical Review, 111, 2565.
Paton, H. J. (1947) The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1961) ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’. In W. V. O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View, 2nd revised edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), [originally published 1951], pp. 2047.
Reath, Andrews (2013) ‘Formal Approaches to Kant’s Formula of Humanity’. In Mark Timmons and Sorin Baiasu (eds), Kant on Practical Justification (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 201229.
Schönecker, Dieter (1999) Kant: Grundlegung III: Die Deduktion des kategorischen Imperativs. Freiburg/Munich: Karl Alber GmbH.
Seel, Gerhard (1989) ‘Sind hypothetische Imperative analytische praktische Sätze?’ In Otfried Höffe (ed.), Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar (Frankfurt am Main: Klosterman), pp. 148171.
Sensen, Oliver (2013) ‘Kant’s Constructivism’. In Carla Bagnoli (ed.), Constructivism in Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 6382.
Stern, Robert (2013) ‘Moral Skepticism, Constructivism, and the Value of Humanity’. In Carla Bagnoli (ed.), Constructivism in Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 2241.
Street, Sharon (2010) ‘What is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics?Philosophy Compass, 5, 363384.
Street, Sharon (2012) ‘Coming to Terms with Contingency: Humean Constructivism about Practical Reason’. In James Lenman and Yonatan Shemmer (eds), Constructivism in Practical Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 4060.
Timmons, Mark (1992) ‘Necessitation and Justification in Kant’s Ethics’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 22, 223261.
Van Cleve, James (1999) Problems from Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wolff, Robert Paul (1973) The Autonomy of Reason: A Commentary on Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. New York: Harper & Row.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Was Kant a ‘Kantian Constructivist’?

  • Jeremy Schwartz (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.