Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Temporal processing deficits in letter-by-letter reading

  • JANET L. INGLES (a1) (a2) and GAIL A. ESKES (a2) (a3)

Abstract

Theories of the cognitive impairment underlying letter-by-letter reading vary widely, including prelexical and lexical level deficits. One prominent prelexical account proposes that the disorder results from difficulty in processing multiple letters simultaneously. We investigated whether this deficit extends to letters presented in rapid temporal succession. A letter-by-letter reader, G.M., was administered a rapid serial visual presentation task that has been used widely to study the temporal processing characteristics of the normal visual system. Comparisons were made to a control group of 6 brain-damaged individuals without reading deficits. Two target letters were embedded at varying temporal positions in a stream of rapidly presented single digits. After each stream, the identities of the two letters were reported. G.M. required an extended period of time after he had processed one letter before he was able to reliably identify a second letter, relative to the controls. In addition, G.M.'s report of the second letter was most impaired when it immediately followed the first letter, a pattern not seen in the controls, indicating that G.M. had difficulty processing the two items together. These data suggest that a letter-by-letter reading strategy may be adopted to help compensate for a deficit in the temporal processing of letters (JINS, 2007, 13, 110–119.)

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr. Janet Ingles, School of Human Communication Disorders, Dalhousie University, 5599 Fenwick Street, Halifax, NS, B3H 1R2, Canada. E-mail: janet.ingles@dal.ca

References

Hide All

REFERENCES

Arguin, M., Bub, D., & Bowers, J. (1998). Extent and limits of covert lexical activation in letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 5392.
Behrmann, M. & Bub, D. (1992). Surface dyslexia and dysgraphia: Dual routes, single lexicon. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 209251.
Behrmann, M., Nelson, J., & Sekuler, E.B. (1998a). Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: “Pure” alexia is not pure. Neuropsychologia, 36, 11151132.
Behrmann, M., Plaut, D.C., & Nelson, J. (1998b). A literature review and new data supporting an interactive account of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 751.
Behrmann, M. & Shallice, T. (1995). Pure alexia: A nonspatial visual disorder affecting letter activation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 409454.
Bowers, J.S., Arguin, M., & Bub, D.N. (1996). Fast and specific access to orthographic knowledge in a case of letter-by-letter surface alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 525567.
Butler, B. & Hains, S. (1979). Individual differences in word recognition latency. Memory and Cognition, 7, 6876.
Chun, M.M. & Potter, M.C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109127.
Duncan, J., Ward, R., & Shapiro, K. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369, 313315.
Farah, M. (1999). Are there orthography specific brain regions? In R.M. Klein & P.A. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 221243). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Farah, M.J. & Wallace, M.A. (1991). Pure alexia as a visual impairment: A reconsideration. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 313334.
Friedman, R.B. & Alexander, M.P. (1984). Pictures, images, and pure alexia: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 923.
Friedman, R.B. & Hadley, J.A. (1992). Letter-by-letter surface alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 185208.
Giesbrecht, B. & Di Lollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 14541466.
Hanley, J.R. & Kay, J. (1996). Reading speed in pure alexia. Neuropsychologia, 34, 11651174.
Heaton, R., Avitable, N., Grant, I., & Matthews, C. (1999). Further cross-validation of regression-based neuropsychological norms with an update for the Boston Naming Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 572582.
Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition. London: Academic Press.
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia (PALPA). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kiernan, R.J., Mueller, J., Langston, J.W., & Dyke, C.V. (1987). The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: A brief but differentiated approach to cognitive assessment. Annals of Internal Medicine, 107, 481485.
Kinsbourne, M. & Warrington, E.K. (1962). A disorder of simultaneous form perception. Brain, 85, 461486.
Kucera, F. & Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
LaBerge, D.L. & Samuals, J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic word processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293323.
Levine, D.N. & Calvanio, R. (1978). A study of the visual defect in verbal alexia-simultanagnosia. Brain, 101, 6581.
Patterson, K. & Hodges, J.R. (1992). Deterioration in word meaning: Implications for reading. Neuropsychologia, 30, 10251040.
Patterson, K. & Kay, J. (1982). Letter-by-letter reading: Psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 411441.
Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56115.
Potter, M.C., Chun, M.M., Banks, B.S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979992.
Raymond, J.E. (2003). New objects, not new features, trigger the attentional blink. Psychological Science, 14, 5459.
Raymond, J.E., Shapiro, K.L., & Arnell, K.M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849860.
Raymond, J.E., Shapiro, K.L., & Arnell, K.M. (1995). Similarity determines the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 653662.
Seiffert, A.E. & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 10611073.
Seymour, P.H.K. & Porpodas, C.D. (1980). Lexical and non-lexical processing of spelling in dyslexia. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.
Shapiro, K., Hillstrom, A., & Husain, M. (2000). Selective attention to objects and time. In F. Boller, J. Grafman, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1) (pp. 427458). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Shapiro, K.L. & Raymond, J.E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention, inhibition or interference? In D. Dagenbach & T.H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Shapiro, K.L., Raymond, J.E., & Arnell, K.M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357371.
Visser, T.A.W., Bischof, W.F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 458469.
Warrington, E.K. & James, M. (1991). The Visual Object and Space Perception Battery. Suffolk, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
Warrington, E.K. & Langdon, D. (1994). Spelling dyslexia: A deficit of the visual word-form. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 57, 211216.
Warrington, E.K. & Langdon, D.W. (2002). Does the spelling dyslexic read by recognizing orally spelled words? An investigation of a letter-by-letter reader. Neurocase, 8, 210218.
Warrington, E.K. & Shallice, T. (1980). Word-form dyslexia. Brain, 103, 99112.
Wilkinson, G.S. (1993). WRAT-3. The Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range, Inc.

Keywords

Temporal processing deficits in letter-by-letter reading

  • JANET L. INGLES (a1) (a2) and GAIL A. ESKES (a2) (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed