Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Discrepancy-Based Evidence for Loss of Thinking Abilities (DELTA): Development and Validation of a Novel Approach to Identifying Cognitive Changes

  • Breton M. Asken (a1) (a2), Kelsey R. Thomas (a3) (a4), Athene Lee (a1) (a5), Jennifer D. Davis (a1) (a6), Paul F. Malloy (a1) (a5), Stephen P. Salloway (a1) (a5) and Stephen Correia (a1) (a7)...

Abstract

Objective:

To develop and validate the Discrepancy-based Evidence for Loss of Thinking Abilities (DELTA) score. The DELTA score characterizes the strength of evidence for cognitive decline on a continuous spectrum using well-established psychometric principles for improving detection of cognitive changes.

Methods:

DELTA score development used neuropsychological test scores from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort (two tests each from Memory, Executive Function, and Language domains). We derived regression-based normative reference scores using age, gender, years of education, and word-reading ability from robust cognitively normal ADNI participants. Discrepancies between predicted and observed scores were used for calculating the DELTA score (range 0–15). We validated DELTA scores primarily against longitudinal Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) and Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) scores (baseline assessment through Year 3) using linear mixed models and secondarily against cross-sectional Alzheimer’s biomarkers.

Results:

There were 1359 ADNI participants with calculable baseline DELTA scores (age 73.7 ± 7.1 years, 55.4% female, 100% white/Caucasian). Higher baseline DELTA scores (stronger evidence of cognitive decline) predicted higher baseline CDR-SOB (ΔR2 = .318) and faster rates of CDR-SOB increase over time (ΔR2 = .209). Longitudinal changes in DELTA scores tracked closely and in the same direction as CDR-SOB scores (fixed and random effects of mean + mean-centered DELTA, ΔR2 > .7). Results were similar for FAQ scores. High DELTA scores predicted higher PET-Aβ SUVr (ρ = 324), higher CSF-pTau/CSF-Aβ ratio (ρ = .460), and demonstrated PPV > .9 for positive Alzheimer’s disease biomarker classification.

Conclusions:

Data support initial development and validation of the DELTA score through its associations with longitudinal functional changes and Alzheimer’s biomarkers. We provide several considerations for future research and include an automated scoring program for clinical use.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Breton M. Asken, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of Florida, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Box G-BH, Division of Clinical Psychology, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Tel: +1 401 444 1929; Fax: +1 401 444 1911. E-mail: basken8@phhp.ufl.edu

References

Hide All
Arbuthnott, K. & Frank, J. (2000). Trail making test, part B as a measure of executive control: Validation using a set-switching paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22(4), 518528. doi: 10.1076/1380-3395(200008)22:4;1-0;FT518
Benjamin, D.J., Berger, J.O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B.A., Wagenmakers, E.J., Berk, R., Bollen, K.A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., Cesarini, D., Chambers, C.D., Clyde, M., Cook, T.D., De Boeck, P., Dienes, Z., Dreber, A., Easwaran, K., Efferson, C., Fehr, E., Fidler, F., Field, A.P., Forster, M., George, E.I., Gonzalez, R., Goodman, S., Green, E., Green, D.P., Greenwald, A.G., Hadfield, J.D., Hedges, L.V., Held, L., Hua Ho, T., Hoijtink, H., Hruschka, D.J., Imai, K., Imbens, G., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Jeon, M., Jones, J.H., Kirchler, M., Laibson, D., List, J., Little, R., Lupia, A., Machery, E., Maxwell, S.E., McCarthy, M., Moore, D.A., Morgan, S.L., Munafó, M., Nakagawa, S., Nyhan, B., Parker, T.H., Pericchi, L., Perugini, M., Rouder, J., Rousseau, J., Savalei, V., Schönbrodt, F.D., Sellke, T., Sinclair, B., Tingley, D., Van Zandt, T., Vazire, S., Watts, D.J., Winship, C., Wolpert, R.L., Xie, Y., Young, C., Zinman, J., & Johnson, V.E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 610. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
Binder, L.M., Iverson, G.L., & Brooks, B.L. (2009). To err is human: “Abnormal” neuropsychological scores and variability are common in healthy adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(1), 3146.
Bondi, M.W., Edmonds, E.C., Jak, A.J., Clark, L.R., Delano-Wood, L., McDonald, C.R., Nation, D.A., Libon, D.J., Au, R., Galasko, D., & Salmon, D.P. (2014). Neuropsychological criteria for mild cognitive impairment improves diagnostic precision, biomarker associations, and progression rates. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 42(1), 275289.
Bondi, M.W. & Smith, G.E. (2014). Mild cognitive impairment: A concept and diagnostic entity in need of input from neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(2), 129134.
Boyle, P.A., Yu, L., Wilson, R.S., Leurgans, S.E., Schneider, J.A., & Bennett, D.A. (2018). Person-specific contribution of neuropathologies to cognitive loss in old age. Annals of Neurology, 83(1), 7483.
Brooks, B.L. & Iverson, G.L. (2010). Comparing actual to estimated base rates of “abnormal” scores on neuropsychological test batteries: Implications for interpretation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(1), 1421.
Brooks, B.L., Iverson, G.L., & White, T. (2009). Advanced interpretation of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery with older adults: Base rate analyses, discrepancy scores, and interpreting change. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(7), 647657.
Brooks, B.L., Sherman, E.M., Iverson, G.L., Slick, D.J., & Strauss, E. (2011). Psychometric foundations for the interpretation of neuropsychological test results. In The Little Black Book of Neuropsychology, (pp. 893922). Boston, MA: Springer.
Casaletto, K.B., Marx, G., Dutt, S., Neuhaus, J., Saloner, R., Kritikos, L., Miller, B., & Kramer, J.H. (2017). Is “Learning” episodic memory? Distinct cognitive and neuroanatomic correlates of immediate recall during learning trials in neurologically normal aging and neurodegenerative cohorts. Neuropsychologia, 102, 1928.
Crane, P.K., Carle, A., Gibbons, L.E., Insel, P., Mackin, R.S., Gross, A., Jones, R.N., Mukherjee, S., Curtis, S. M., Harvey, D., & Weiner, M. (2012). Development and assessment of a composite score for memory in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Brain Imaging and Behavior, 6(4), 502516.
Crawford, J.R., Moore, J.W., & Cameron, I.M. (1992). Verbal fluency: A NART-based equation for the estimation of premorbid performance. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31(3), 327329.
De Meyer, G., Shapiro, F., Vanderstichele, H., Vanmechelen, E., Engelborghs, S., De Deyn, P.P., Coart, E., Hansson, O., Minthon, L., Zetterberg, H., &Blennow, K. (2010). Diagnosis-independent Alzheimer disease biomarker signature in cognitively normal elderly people. Archives of Neurology, 67(8), 949956. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.179
Dotson, V.M., Kitner-Triolo, M.H., Evans, M.K., & Zonderman, A.B. (2009). Effects of race and socioeconomic status on the relative influence of education and literacy on cognitive functioning. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(4), 580589.
Duff, K., Chelune, G.J., & Dennett, K. (2011). Predicting estimates of premorbid memory functioning: Validation in a dementia sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(8), 701705.
Duff, K., Dalley, B., Suhrie, K.R., & Hammers, D.B. (2018). Predicting premorbid scores on the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status and their validation in an elderly sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 34(3), 395402.
Edmonds, E.C., Delano-Wood, L., Clark, L.R., Jak, A.J., Nation, D.A., McDonald, C.R., Libon, D.J., Au, R., Galasko, D., Salmon, D.P., & Bondi, M.W. (2015). Susceptibility of the conventional criteria for mild cognitive impairment to false-positive diagnostic errors. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 11(4), 415424.
Eppig, J.S., Edmonds, E.C., Campbell, L., Sanderson-Cimino, M., Delano-Wood, L., Bondi, M.W., & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, I. (2017). Statistically derived subtypes and associations with cerebrospinal fluid and genetic biomarkers in mild cognitive impairment: A latent profile analysis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23(7), 564576. doi: 10.1017/S135561771700039X
Gibbons, L.E., Carle, A.C., Mackin, R.S., Harvey, D., Mukherjee, S., Insel, P., Curtis, S.M., Mungas, D., Crane, P.K., & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2012). A composite score for executive functioning, validated in Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants with baseline mild cognitive impairment. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 6(4), 517527.
Hansson, O., Seibyl, J., Stomrud, E., Zetterberg, H., Trojanowski, J.Q., Bittner, T., Lifke, V., Corradini, V., Eichenlaub, U., Batrla, R., & Buck, K. (2018). CSF biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease concord with amyloid-β PET and predict clinical progression: A study of fully automated immunoassays in BioFINDER and ADNI cohorts. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 14(11), 14701481.
Houck, Z.M., Asken, B.M., Bauer, R.M., Kontos, A.P., McCrea, M.A., McAllister, T.W., Broglio, S.P., Clugston, J.R., & Care Consortium Investigators. (2019). Multivariate base rates of low scores and reliable decline on ImPACT in healthy collegiate athletes using Care Consortium norms. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 25(9), 961971.
Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2018). The proposal to lower p value thresholds to .005. JAMA, 319(14), 14291430. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1536
Iverson, G.L. & Brooks, B.L. (2011). Improving accuracy for identifying cognitive impairment. In Schoenberg, M.R. & Scott, J.G. (Eds.), The Little Black Book of Neuropsychology, (pp. 923950). Boston, MA: Springer.
Jack, C.R., Bennett, D.A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M.C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S.B., Holtzman, D.M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., & Liu, E. (2018). NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 14(4), 535562.
Jak, A.J., Bondi, M.W., Delano-Wood, L., Wierenga, C., Corey-Bloom, J., Salmon, D.P., & Delis, D.C. (2009). Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(5), 368375.
Jak, A.J., Preis, S.R., Beiser, A.S., Seshadri, S., Wolf, P.A., Bondi, M.W., & Au, R. (2016). Neuropsychological criteria for mild cognitive impairment and dementia risk in the Framingham Heart Study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 22(9), 937943.
James, B.D., Wilson, R.S., Boyle, P.A., Trojanowski, J.Q., Bennett, D.A., & Schneider, J.A. (2016). TDP-43 stage, mixed pathologies, and clinical Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Brain, 139(11), 29832993.
Landau, S., Thomas, B., Thurfjell, L., Schmidt, M., Margolin, R., Mintun, M., Pontecorvo, M., Baker, S.L., Jagust, W.J., & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2014). Amyloid PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease: A comparison of three radiotracers. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 41(7), 13981407.
Manly, J.J. & Echemendia, R.J. (2007). Race-specific norms: Using the model of hypertension to understand issues of race, culture, and education in neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3), 319325. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.006
McGurn, B., Starr, J., Topfer, J., Pattie, A., Whiteman, M., Lemmon, H.A., Whalley, L.J., & Deary, I. (2004). Pronunciation of irregular words is preserved in dementia, validating premorbid IQ estimation. Neurology, 62(7), 11841186.
Morris, J.C. (1993). The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology, 43(11), 24122414.
Mortamais, M., Ash, J.A., Harrison, J., Kaye, J., Kramer, J., Randolph, C., Pose, C., Albala, B., Ropacki, M., Ritchie, C.W., & Ritchie, K. (2017). Detecting cognitive changes in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: A review of its feasibility. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 13(4), 468492. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.2365
Nelson, P.T., Dickson, D.W., Trojanowski, J.Q., Jack, C.R., Boyle, P.A., Arfanakis, K., Rademakers, R., Alafuzoff, I., Attems, J., Brayne, C., Coyle-Gilchrist, I.T., & Schneider, J.A. (2019). Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE): Consensus working group report. Brain, 142(6), 15031527. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz099
Oltra-Cucarella, J., Sánchez-SanSegundo, M., Lipnicki, D.M., Sachdev, P.S., Crawford, J.D., Pérez-Vicente, J. A., Cabello-Rodríguez, L., Ferrer-Cascales, R., & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2018). Using base rate of low scores to identify progression from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(7), 13601366.
Ossenkoppele, R., Pijnenburg, Y.A., Perry, D.C., Cohn-Sheehy, B.I., Scheltens, N.M., Vogel, J.W., Kramer, J.H., van der Vlies, A.E., Joie, R.L., Rosen, H.J., & van der Flier, W.M. (2015). The behavioural/dysexecutive variant of Alzheimer’s disease: Clinical, neuroimaging and pathological features. Brain, 138(Pt 9), 27322749. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv191
Pandya, S.Y., Clem, M.A., Silva, L.M., & Woon, F.L. (2016). Does mild cognitive impairment always lead to dementia? A review. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 369, 5762.
Perry, D.C., Brown, J.A., Possin, K.L., Datta, S., Trujillo, A., Radke, A., Karydas, A., Kornak, J., Sias, A.C., Rabinovici, G.D., & Gorno-Tempini, M.L. (2017). Clinicopathological correlations in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain, 140(12), 33293345.
Petersen, R.C., Smith, G.E., Waring, S.C., Ivnik, R.J., Tangalos, E.G., & Kokmen, E. (1999). Mild cognitive impairment: Clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology, 56(3), 303308.
Pfeffer, R.I., Kurosaki, T.T., Harrah, C.H. Jr, Chance, J.M., & Filos, S. (1982). Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. Journal of Gerontology, 37(3), 323329.
Phillips, J.S., Da Re, F., Dratch, L., Xie, S.X., Irwin, D.J., McMillan, C.T., Vaishnavi, S.N., Ferrarese, C., Lee, E.B., Shaw, L.M., & Trojanowski, J.Q. (2018). Neocortical origin and progression of gray matter atrophy in nonamnestic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 63, 7587. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.11.008
Rivera Mindt, M., Byrd, D., Saez, P., & Manly, J. (2010). Increasing culturally competent neuropsychological services for ethnic minority populations: A call to action. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(3), 429453. doi: 10.1080/13854040903058960
Sherwood, B., Zhou, A.X.H., Weintraub, S., & Wang, L. (2016). Using quantile regression to create baseline norms for neuropsychological tests. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, 2, 1218.
Thomas, K.R., Eppig, J.S., Weigand, A.J., Edmonds, E.C., Wong, C.G., Jak, A.J., Delano-Wood, L., Galasko, D.R., Salmon, D.P., Edland, S.D., & Bondi, M.W. (2019). Artificially low mild cognitive impairment to normal reversion rate in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 15(4), 561569.
Wennberg, A.M., Whitwell, J.L., Tosakulwong, N., Weigand, S.D., Murray, M.E., Machulda, M.M., Petrucelli, L., Mielke, M.M., Jack, C.R. Jr, Knopman, D.S., & Parisi, J.E. (2019). The influence of tau, amyloid, alpha-synuclein, TDP-43, and vascular pathology in clinically normal elderly individuals. Neurobiology of Aging, 77, 2636.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Asken et al. supplementary materials
Asken et al. supplementary materials 1

 Word (19 KB)
19 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Asken et al. supplementary materials
Asken et al. supplementary materials 2

 Unknown (60 KB)
60 KB

Discrepancy-Based Evidence for Loss of Thinking Abilities (DELTA): Development and Validation of a Novel Approach to Identifying Cognitive Changes

  • Breton M. Asken (a1) (a2), Kelsey R. Thomas (a3) (a4), Athene Lee (a1) (a5), Jennifer D. Davis (a1) (a6), Paul F. Malloy (a1) (a5), Stephen P. Salloway (a1) (a5) and Stephen Correia (a1) (a7)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed