Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Correcting Bias Caused by Missing Data in the Estimate of the Effect of Apolipoprotein ε4 on Cognitive Decline

  • Charles B. Hall (a1) (a2), Richard B. Lipton (a1) (a2), Mindy J. Katz (a2) and Cuiling Wang (a1) (a2)

Abstract

Longitudinal administration of neuropsychological instruments are often used to assess age-related changes in cognition. Informative loss to follow-up may bias the results of these studies. Herein, we use auxiliary data to adjust for informative loss to follow-up. In the Einstein Aging Study, memory was assessed annually in a community sample of adults age 70+, free of dementia at baseline, using the free recall from the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, and via telephone using the Memory Impairment Screen for Telephone (the auxiliary data). Joint linear mixed models were used to assess how the effect of the APOE ε4 genotype may be affected by informative missingness in the in-person data. A total of 620 EAS participants contributed 2085 person years of follow-up to the analyses. Memory decline rates estimated in joint models were 19% greater in ε4 negative participants and 27% greater in ε4 positive participants compared to traditional approaches; the effect of APOE ε4 on memory decline was 37% greater. Joint modeling methods can help address bias caused by informative missing data in the estimation of the effect of risk factors on cognitive change, and may be applicable to a broader range of outcomes in longitudinal aging studies. (JINS, 2014, 20, 1–6)

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence and reprint requests to: Charles B. Hall, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Block 312, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx NY 10463. E-mail: charles.hall@einstein.yu.edu

References

Hide All
Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716723.
Blessed, G., Tomlinson, B. E., & Roth, M. (1968). The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 797811.
Daniels, M. J., & Hogan, J. W. (2008). Missing data in longitudinal studies: Strategies for Bayesian modeling and sensitivity analysis. New York: Chapman & Hall.
Derby, C. A., Burns, L. C., Wang, C., Katz, M. J., Zimmerman, M. E., L’Italiend, G., & Lipton, R. B. (2013). Screening for predementia AD: Time dependent operating characteristics of episodic memory tests. Neurology, 80, 13071314.
Dodge, H. H., Wang, C. N., Chang, C. C., & Ganguli, M. (2011). Terminal decline and practice effects in non-demented older adults: The MoVIES project. Neurology, 77, 722730.
Grober, E., & Buschke, H. (1987). Genuine memory deficits in dementia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 3, 1336.
Ibrahim, J. G., Lipsitz, S. R., & Horton, N. (2001). Using auxiliary data for parameter estimation with non-ignorably missing outcomes. Applied Statistics, 50, 361373.
Katz, M. J., Lipton, R. B., Hall, C. B., Zimmerman, M. E., Sanders, A. E., Verghese, J., & Derby, C. A. (2012). Age-specific and sex-specific prevalence and incidence of mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and Alzheimer dementia in Blacks and Whites: A report from the Einstein aging study. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 26, 335343.
Lipton, R. B., Katz, M. J., Kuslansky, G., Sliwinski, M. J., Stewart, W. F., Verghese, J., & Buschke, H. (2003). Screening for dementia by telephone using the memory impairment screen. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 51, 13821390.
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38, 963974.
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Morris, J. C. (1993). The clinical dementia rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology, 43, 24122414.
Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581592.
Sanders, A. E., Wang, C., Katz, M., Derby, C. A., Barzilai, N., Ozelius, L., & Lipton, R. B. (2010). Association of a functional polymorphism in the Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) gene with memory decline and incidence of dementia. Journal of the American Medical Assnociation, 303, 150158.
Sliwinski, M. J., Stawski, R. S., Hall, C. B., Katz, M., Verghese, J., & Lipton, R. (2006). Distinguishing preterminal and terminal cognitive decline. European Psychologist, 11, 172181.
Thorvaldsson, V., Hofer, S. M., Berg, S., Skoog, I., Sacuiu, S., & Johansson, B. (2008). Onset of terminal decline in cognitive abilities in individuals without dementia. Neurology, 71, 882887.
Wang, C., & Hall, C. B. (2010). Correction of bias from non-random missing longitudinal data using auxiliary information. Statistics in Medicine, 29, 671679.
Ward, A., Crean, S., Mercaldi, C. J., Collins, J. M., Boyd, D., Cook, M. N., & Arrighi, H. M. (2012). Prevalence of apolipoprotein E4 genotype and homozygotes (APOE e4/4) among patients diagnosed with Alzheimer’s Disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology, 38(1), 117.
Wilson, R. S., Beckett, L. A., Bienias, J. L., Evans, D. A., & Bennett, D. A. (2003). Terminal decline in cognitive function. Neurology, 60, 17821787.
Wilson, R. S., Beck, T. L., Bienias, J. L., & Bennett, D. A. (2007). Terminal cognitive decline: Accelerated loss of cognition in the last years of life. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69, 131137.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed