Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T12:35:50.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CICERO ON ECONOMIC SUBJECTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

GLORIA VIVENZA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 385 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Any edition of Cicero's De Officiis can do for references, but as I found it useful to use Walter Millar's English translation for readers not familiar with Latin, I refer to the Loeb edition of Cambridge Mass./London, Harvard University Press 1968. Some comments of M. Testard from the Belles Lettres edition (Paris 1970 and 1974) have been referred to.

Renaissance commentaries on De Officiis:

M.T.Ciceronis de officiis libri tres, cum copiosissimis viri longe doctissimi commentariis, & cum Viti Amerbachij commentariolis, Annotationibus Erasmi Roter. Philippi Melanch.& Disquisitiones aliquot Caelij Calcagnini (…), Parisiis, Apud Thomam Richardum (…), 1550.

Ciceronis de officiis libri III. Cum Petri Marsi, Francisci Maturantii & Ascensii commentariis. M.Nizolis defensiones, Venetiis, 1563, apud Johan. Gryphium.

M.T.Ciceronis De Officiis libri tres, et in illos S.Rachelii commentarius philosophicus-juridicus. Amstelaedami 1686.

M.T.Ciceronis de officiis libri tres (…) ex recensione Johannis Georgii Graevii (…), cum eiusdem notis, ut & integris animadversionibus Dionisij Lambini, Fulvii Ursini, Caroli Langii, Francisci Fabritii Marcodurani, Aldi Manutii, nec non selectis aliorum. Accessit (…) Caelii Calcagnini disquisitiones in de officiis libros. M. Antonini Majoragii decisiones contra Calcagninum. Jacobi Griffioli defensiones Ciceronis contra eundem, Amstelodami, ex Typographia p. & I. Blaev, 1688.

Aristotle. Politics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.

Desiderio Erasmo da Rotterdam. Il Ciceroniano. Brescia: La Scuola Editrice, 1965.

Groot, Hugo de. 1702. De iure belli ac pacis. Amsterdam: Westenius.

Plato. The Republic, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.

Pufendorf, Samuel. 1759. De iure naturae et gentium. Frankfurti/Lipsiae: Knoch.

Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1976.

Stewart, Dugald. 1794. “Account of the life and Writings of Adam Smith, LL.D.” In Adam Smith, Essays on Philosophical Subjects, edited by W. P. D.Wightman, J. C. Bryce, and I. S. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.

Annas, Julia. 1997. “Cicero on Stoics and Private Property.” In Griffin, Miriam and Barnes, Jonathan, eds., Philosophia Togata I. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 151–73.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. Jackson. 1999. “The Fox and the Lion: Machiavelli Replies to Cicero.” History of Political Thought 20 (4): 627–45.Google Scholar
Brazzini, Gianfranco. 1988. Dall'economia aristotelica all’ economia politica. Pisa: ETS Editrice.Google Scholar
Canfora, Luciano. 1991. Nota. In Casaubon, I., Polibio, a cura di G.F. Brussich. Palermo: Sellerio.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia. 1978. “Cicero's De Officiis and Machiavelli's Prince.” Sixteenth Century Journal IX (4): 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colish, Marcia. 1990. “Cicero, Ambrose, and Stoic Ethics: Transmission or Transformation?” In Bernardo, A. S. and Levin, S., eds., The Classics in the Middle Ages: Papers of the Twentieth Annual Conference for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies. Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studes, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
D'Ascia, Luca. 1991. Erasmo e l'umanesimo romano. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
De Bujanda, Jesus Martinez. 1987. Index des livres interdits, Vols. III and V. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Dick, Andrew R. 1980. “Cicero, De Officiis 2.21-22.” Philologus 124 (2): pp. 201–211.Google Scholar
Dionisotti, Carlo. 1968. Gli umanisti e il volgare fra Quattro e Cinquecento. Firenze: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Draeseke, Johannes, 1876. “M. Tullii Ciceronis et Ambrosii Episcopi Mediolanensis De Officiis libri tres inter se comparantur.” Rivista di filosofia e istruzione classica 4: 121–64.Google Scholar
Ferrary, Jean-Louis. 1988. Philhéllenisme et Impérialisme. Rome: Ecole française de Rome.Google Scholar
Freedman, Joseph S., 1986. “Cicero in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Rhetoric Instruction.” Rhetorica IV (3): 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabba, Emilio. 1979. “Per un'interpretazione politica del de officiis ciceroniano.” Rendiconti dell'Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei Series 8, 34 (3-4): 117–41.Google Scholar
Gambaro, Angiolo. 1965. “Introduzione.” In Erasmo da Rotterdam, D., Il Ciceroniano. Brescia: La Scuola Editrice, pp. xxi–cxii.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. 1965. “Utilitas publica.” Revue historique du droit français et étranger, 4 série, XXIX.Google Scholar
Gawlick, Guenther. 1963. “Cicero and the Enlightenment.” Studies on Voltaire 25: 657–82.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. 1985. “Renaissance Readers and Ancient Texts: Comments on Some Commentaries.” Renaissance Quarterly 38 (4): 615–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, Anthony and Jardine, Lisa. 1986. From Humanism to the Humanities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence H. 2003. “Stoic Naturalism and Its Critics.” In Inwood, Brad, ed., The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 345–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jossa, Giorgio. 1963. “L'utilitas reipublicae nel pensiero imperiale dell'epoca classica.” Studi Romani XI: 387–405.Google Scholar
Jossa, Giorgio. 1964. “L’ utilitas reipublicae nel pensiero di Cicerone.” Studi romani 12: 269–88.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill. 1983. “Cicero, Stoicism and Textual Criticism: Poliziano on katorthoma.” Rinascimento, n.s., 23: 79–110.Google Scholar
MacKendrick, Paul. 1989. The Philosophical Books of Cicero. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Muckle, J. T. 1948. “The Influence of Cicero in the Formation of Christian Culture.” Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, series III, XLII (2): 107–25.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. E. 1933. “Cicero's De Officiis in Christian Thought: 300-1300.” Essays and Studies in English and Comparative Literature 10: 59–160.Google Scholar
Rico, Francisco. 1998. Il sogno dell'Umanesimo. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcom, 2006. “Morality and the Law: The case of Diogenes of Babylon.” Philosophical Inquiry XXVII (1-2): 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart-Robinson, J. C. 1983. “Cicero Among the Shadows: Scottish Prelections of Virtue and Duty.” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia XXXVIII (1): 25–49.Google Scholar
Testard, Maurice. 1970-74. “Introduction” to Ciceron, Les Devoirs, vol. 1. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, pp. 7–92.Google Scholar
Vegetti, Mario. 1982. “Il pensiero economico greco.” In Storia delle idee politiche economiche e sociali diretta da Luigi Firpo, vol. I. Torino: U.T.E.T., pp. 583–607.Google Scholar
Vivenza, Gloria. 1998. “Roman Thought on Economics and Justice.” In Todd Lowry, S. and Gordon, Barry, eds., Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice. Leiden: Brill, pp. 269–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivenza, Gloria. 2001. “The ‘Northern’ Cicero: On the Fortuna of the De Officiis in Central Europe.” Mésogeios 13–14 (Hommage à Johannes Irmscher).Google Scholar
Vivenza, Gloria. 2004. “Renaissance Cicero: The ‘Economic’ Virtues of De Officiis I, 22 in Some 16th Century Commentaries.” European Journal for the History of Economic Thought 11 (4): 507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia. 1997. “Cicero on Stoics and Private Property.” In Griffin, Miriam and Barnes, Jonathan, eds., Philosophia Togata I. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 151–73.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. Jackson. 1999. “The Fox and the Lion: Machiavelli Replies to Cicero.” History of Political Thought 20 (4): 627–45.Google Scholar
Brazzini, Gianfranco. 1988. Dall'economia aristotelica all’ economia politica. Pisa: ETS Editrice.Google Scholar
Canfora, Luciano. 1991. Nota. In Casaubon, I., Polibio, a cura di G.F. Brussich. Palermo: Sellerio.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia. 1978. “Cicero's De Officiis and Machiavelli's Prince.” Sixteenth Century Journal IX (4): 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colish, Marcia. 1990. “Cicero, Ambrose, and Stoic Ethics: Transmission or Transformation?” In Bernardo, A. S. and Levin, S., eds., The Classics in the Middle Ages: Papers of the Twentieth Annual Conference for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies. Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studes, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
D'Ascia, Luca. 1991. Erasmo e l'umanesimo romano. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
De Bujanda, Jesus Martinez. 1987. Index des livres interdits, Vols. III and V. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Dick, Andrew R. 1980. “Cicero, De Officiis 2.21-22.” Philologus 124 (2): pp. 201–211.Google Scholar
Dionisotti, Carlo. 1968. Gli umanisti e il volgare fra Quattro e Cinquecento. Firenze: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Draeseke, Johannes, 1876. “M. Tullii Ciceronis et Ambrosii Episcopi Mediolanensis De Officiis libri tres inter se comparantur.” Rivista di filosofia e istruzione classica 4: 121–64.Google Scholar
Ferrary, Jean-Louis. 1988. Philhéllenisme et Impérialisme. Rome: Ecole française de Rome.Google Scholar
Freedman, Joseph S., 1986. “Cicero in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Rhetoric Instruction.” Rhetorica IV (3): 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabba, Emilio. 1979. “Per un'interpretazione politica del de officiis ciceroniano.” Rendiconti dell'Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei Series 8, 34 (3-4): 117–41.Google Scholar
Gambaro, Angiolo. 1965. “Introduzione.” In Erasmo da Rotterdam, D., Il Ciceroniano. Brescia: La Scuola Editrice, pp. xxi–cxii.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. 1965. “Utilitas publica.” Revue historique du droit français et étranger, 4 série, XXIX.Google Scholar
Gawlick, Guenther. 1963. “Cicero and the Enlightenment.” Studies on Voltaire 25: 657–82.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. 1985. “Renaissance Readers and Ancient Texts: Comments on Some Commentaries.” Renaissance Quarterly 38 (4): 615–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, Anthony and Jardine, Lisa. 1986. From Humanism to the Humanities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence H. 2003. “Stoic Naturalism and Its Critics.” In Inwood, Brad, ed., The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 345–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jossa, Giorgio. 1963. “L'utilitas reipublicae nel pensiero imperiale dell'epoca classica.” Studi Romani XI: 387–405.Google Scholar
Jossa, Giorgio. 1964. “L’ utilitas reipublicae nel pensiero di Cicerone.” Studi romani 12: 269–88.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill. 1983. “Cicero, Stoicism and Textual Criticism: Poliziano on katorthoma.” Rinascimento, n.s., 23: 79–110.Google Scholar
MacKendrick, Paul. 1989. The Philosophical Books of Cicero. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Muckle, J. T. 1948. “The Influence of Cicero in the Formation of Christian Culture.” Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, series III, XLII (2): 107–25.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. E. 1933. “Cicero's De Officiis in Christian Thought: 300-1300.” Essays and Studies in English and Comparative Literature 10: 59–160.Google Scholar
Rico, Francisco. 1998. Il sogno dell'Umanesimo. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcom, 2006. “Morality and the Law: The case of Diogenes of Babylon.” Philosophical Inquiry XXVII (1-2): 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart-Robinson, J. C. 1983. “Cicero Among the Shadows: Scottish Prelections of Virtue and Duty.” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia XXXVIII (1): 25–49.Google Scholar
Testard, Maurice. 1970-74. “Introduction” to Ciceron, Les Devoirs, vol. 1. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, pp. 7–92.Google Scholar
Vegetti, Mario. 1982. “Il pensiero economico greco.” In Storia delle idee politiche economiche e sociali diretta da Luigi Firpo, vol. I. Torino: U.T.E.T., pp. 583–607.Google Scholar
Vivenza, Gloria. 1998. “Roman Thought on Economics and Justice.” In Todd Lowry, S. and Gordon, Barry, eds., Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice. Leiden: Brill, pp. 269–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivenza, Gloria. 2001. “The ‘Northern’ Cicero: On the Fortuna of the De Officiis in Central Europe.” Mésogeios 13–14 (Hommage à Johannes Irmscher).Google Scholar
Vivenza, Gloria. 2004. “Renaissance Cicero: The ‘Economic’ Virtues of De Officiis I, 22 in Some 16th Century Commentaries.” European Journal for the History of Economic Thought 11 (4): 507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar