Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Microsimulation of pension reforms: behavioural versus nonbehavioural approach

  • MARGHERITA BORELLA (a1) and FLAVIA CODA MOSCAROLA (a2)

Abstract

We analyse the impact of various pension regimes, as shaped by recent Italian reforms, on retirement age, adequacy issues, and redistribution. We add to the literature on microsimulation by accounting for individuals' reactions to financial incentives when deciding to retire. We find that shifting from a generous defined benefit (DB) system to an actuarially fair notional defined contribution (NDC) system induces individuals, particularly men, to postpone retirement. Voluntary postponement of retirement would grant employees a replacement rate comparable to that obtained in the pre-reform DB regime, while the self-employed experience a substantial reduction in their replacement rate.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Belloni, M. and Alessie, R. (2009) The importance of financial incentives on retirement choices: new evidence for Italy. Labour Economics, 16(5): 578588.
Baker, M., Gruber, J., and Milligan, K. (2003) The retirement incentive effects of Canada's income security programs. Canadian Journal of Economics, 36(2): 261290.
Blundell, R., Meghir, C., and Smiths, S. (2002) Pensions incentives and the patterns of early retirement. Economic Journal, 112: 153170.
Borella, M. (2004) The error structure of earnings: an analysis on Italian longitudinal data. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali/International Review of Economics and Business, 51(3): 405422.
Borella, M. and Coda Moscarola, F. (2006) Distributive properties of pension systems: a simulation of the Italian transition from defined benefit to notional defined contribution. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 65(1) (May).
Borella, M. and Fornero, E. (2009) Adequacy of pension systems in Europe: an analysis based on comprehensive replacement rates. Paper prepared for the AIM project. ENEPRI Report n. 68.
Bourguignon, F. and Spadaro, A. (2006) Microsimulation as a tool for evaluating redistribution policies. Journal of Economic Inequality, 4(1): 77106.
Coile, C. and Gruber, J. (2000) Social security incentives for retirement. Working Paper 7651, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Covip (2008) Relazione per l'anno 2007. Commissione Vigilanza per I Fondi Pensione, Rome.
Creedy, J. and Kalb, G. (2006) Labour Supply and Microsimulation: The Evaluation of Tax Policy Reforms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Dekkers, G., Buslei, H., Cozzolino, M., Desmet, R., Geyer, J., Hofmann, D., Raitano, M., Steiner, V., Tanda, P., Tedeschi, S., and Verschueren, F. (2009) What are the consequences of the AWG-projections for the adequacy of social security pensions? An application of the dynamic micro simulation model MIDAS for Belgium, Italy and Germany. ENEPRI Research Report n.65, AIM WP4.
Eurostat (2009) Living conditions and welfare. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu.
Feldstein, M. and Liebman, J. B. (2002) The Distributional Aspects of Social Security and Social Security Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedberg, L. and Webb, A. (2005) Retirement and the evolution of pension structure. Journal of Human Resources, 40(2): 281308.
Gruber, J. and Wise, D. (2004) Social Security Programs and Retirements Around the World, Chicago: University of Chicago, NBER.
ISTAT (2003a) Annuario Statistico Italiano 2003. Roma.
ISTAT (2003b) Rilevazione Trimestrale sulle Forze di Lavoro. Roma.
Mazzaferro, C. and Morciano, M. (2005) Un Modello di Microsimulazione Dinamica per la Stima della Riforma Pensionistica. Paper prepared for the SIEP Annual Conference Politiche Pubbliche, Sviluppo e Crescita, University of PAVIA.
Reynolds, M. O. and Smolensky, E. (1977) Post-fisc distributions of income in 1950, 1961, and 1970. Public Finance Quarterly, 5(4): 419438.
Richiardi, M. and Leombruni, R. (2006) LABORsim: an agent-based microsimulation of labour supply −an application to Italy. Computational Economics, 27(1): 6388.
Smith, J. P. (2003) Trends and projections in income replacement during retirement. Journal of Labor Economics, 21(4): 755782.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Microsimulation of pension reforms: behavioural versus nonbehavioural approach

  • MARGHERITA BORELLA (a1) and FLAVIA CODA MOSCAROLA (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.