Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T18:44:02.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of informational prompts about survivor benefits for spouses on Social Security claim intentions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2019

Francisco Perez-Arce ,
Lila Rabinovich ,
Anya Samek  and
Joanne Yoong
Francisco Perez-Arce*
Affiliation:
Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Washington, DC, USA
Lila Rabinovich
Affiliation:
Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Washington, DC, USA
Anya Samek
Affiliation:
Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Joanne Yoong
Affiliation:
Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Washington, DC, USA Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
*
*Corresponding author. Email: perezarc@usc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Married men's Social Security claiming behavior does not always take into account spouse and survivor benefits. Specifically, married men tend to choose claiming ages that do not maximize the household's and widow's expected present value of benefits. To understand what contributes to this pattern, we conduct an online survey experiment with a representative sample of Americans. We randomly assign respondents to one of four vignettes that present information about a character who is choosing when to claim his retirement benefits. The vignettes differ by whether the character is married or not, whether information about survivor benefits is presented, and whether the information includes an illustrative example. We next ask respondents to provide advice to the character about when to claim. We find that (1) respondents do value survivor benefits for spouses, and (2) information about survivor benefits tends to increase the suggested claiming ages only among the subgroup of respondents who are the least knowledgeable about these benefits.

Keywords

Decision-makinglongitudinal dataSocial SecuritySocial Security claimingspousal and survivor benefitsH55D14C93
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 20 , Special Issue 4: New Longitudinal Data for Retirement Analysis and Policy , October 2021 , pp. 504 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alattar, L, Messel, M and Rogofsky, D (2018) An introduction to the understanding America study Internet panel. Social Security Bulletin 78, 13–28.Google Scholar
Angrisani, M and Casanova, M (2019) What you think you know can hurt you: under/over confidence in financial knowledge and preparedness for retirement. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474721900013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronshtein, G, Scott, J, Shoven, JB and Slavov, SN (2016) Leaving Big Money on the Table: Arbitrage Opportunities in Delaying Social Security. NBER WP 22853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, JR, Kapteyn, A and Mitchell, OS (2016) Framing and claiming: how information framing affects expected social security claiming behavior. Journal of Risk and Insurance 83(1), 139-162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carman, K and Hung, A (2018) Social Security household benefits: measuring program knowledge. Michigan Retirement and Disability Research Center, Working Paper 018-384, UM18-05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebold, J, Moulton, J and Scott, J (2016) Early claiming of higher-earning husbands, the survivor benefit, and the incidence of poverty among recent widows. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance 16(4), 485–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, RJ (1993) Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research 20, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriques, AM (2018) How does social security claiming respond to incentives? Considering husbands’ and wives’ benefits separately. Journal of Human Resources 53(2), 382–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koball, HL, Moiduddin, E, Henderson, J, Goesling, B and Besculides, M (2010) What do we know about the link between marriage and health? Journal of Family Issues 31, 1019–1040. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10365834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, J and Luttmer, EFP (2012) The perception of social security incentives for labor supply and retirement: the median voter knows more than you'd think. Tax Policy and the Economy 26, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarry, K and Schoeni, RF (2005) Widow(er) poverty and out-of-pocket medical expenditures near the end of life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 60(3), S160–S168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munnell, AH and Soto, M (2005) What replacement rates do households actually experience in retirement? Conference Proceedings. Available at http://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Munnell.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sass, SA, Sun, W and Webb, A (2007) Why do married men claim social security benefits so early? Ignorance or caddishness? SSRN Electronic Journal. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College Working Paper No. 2007–17.Google Scholar
Sass, SA, Sun, W and Webb, A (2013) Social security claiming decision of married men and widow poverty. Economic Letters 19, 20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoven, JB and Slavov, SN (2012) When Does it Pay to Delay Social Security? The Impact of Mortality, Interest Rates, and Program Rules. NBER WP 18210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoong, J, Rabinovich, L and Saw, HW (2015) What do people know about Social Security? Paper No. 2015-022, CESR-Schaeffer Working Paper Series, Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California.Google Scholar