Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:55:22.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wujiajiania sutherlandi fauna (Elvinia biozone, Paibian stage, Furongian series—“Upper” Cambrian) from the Emigrant Formation, Nevada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Frederick A. Sundberg
Affiliation:
1Show Low High School, 500 E. Old Linden Rd., Show Low, Arizona 85901,
Richard Kurkewicz
Affiliation:
2Western Trilobite Association, 644 Castro Street, San Francisco, California 94114,
Dustin L. Rooks
Affiliation:
3Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Escalante Field Station, PO Box 225, Escalante, Utah 84726,

Extract

Fossils from the Emigrant Formation of Nevada are rare despite the geologic time (uppermost Lower Cambrian to Lower Ordovician) represented by the 700 m thick sequence of deeper water, fine-grained clastics and carbonates. This report documents trilobites from the Elvinia Biozone from this formation in the Goldfield Hills, Nevada. Previously, trilobites and inarticulate brachiopods from the Emigrant Formation have been reported from the lowermost and uppermost portions. in the lower portion, trilobites from the Olenellus Biozone (Dyeran Stage, “Lower” Cambrian) occur in the basal few meters, and are overlain by 15 m of mudstones containing the Eokochaspis nodosa, Amecephalus arrojosensis, and Oryctocephalus indicus biozones (Lin and Knox, 2001; Sundberg and McCollum, 2003) of the lower Delamaran Stage (“Middle” Cambrian, Fig. 1). Collections above the lower mudstones include the Glossopleura Biozone of the Delamaran Stage, Ehmaniella? Biozone of the Topazan Stage, and the Ptychagnostus atavus and Cedaria selwyni biozones of the Marjuman Stage (unpublished data). the only other fossil remains that have been reported include a possible Elvinia Biozone fossil from the middle portion of the formation (McCollum and Sundberg, 2000) and Saukia Biozone fossils from the upper portion of the formation (Albers and Stewart, 1972; unpublished data). Lower Ordovician conodonts have also been found in the upper portion of the formation (M. Miller, personal commun. to L. McCollum, 2003).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albers, J. P., and Stewart, J. H. 1972. Geology and mineral deposits of Esmeralda County, Nevada. Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Bulletin 78, 80 p.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten, aus ihren Lebenden Verwandten Entwickelt; Nebst einer Systematischen Übersicht Aller zeither Beschriebenen Arten. Reimer, Berlin, 147 p.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., and Ludvigsen, R. 1998. Upper Steptoean (Upper Cambrian) Trilobites from the McKay Group of southeastern British Columbia, Canada. Paleontological Socïety Memoir 49, 43 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1863. Preliminary notice of the fauna of the Potsdam Sandstone; with remarks upon the previously known species of fossils and descriptions of some new ones, from the sandstone of the Upper Mississippi Valley. New York State Cabinet of Natural History, 16th Annual Report, p. 119222.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1909. Über die Agnostiden. Zeitschrift der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, 61:380401.Google Scholar
Kepper, J. 1981. Ramp and platform deposition during the Middle Cambrian, eastern California and western Nevada. Proceedings of the 2nd International Cambrian Symposium. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, 81-743:102105.Google Scholar
Lin, Jih-Pai, and Knox, L. W. 2001. Preliminary report on acrotretid and paterniid brachiopods from the Emigrant Formation (Middle Cambrian) at Big Mike Canyon, Esmeralda County, Nevada. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 33(2):7677.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. H., and Lin, H. L. 1980. Cambro-Ordovician boundary in western Zhejiang and the trilobites contained therein. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 19:118134.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., and Westrop, S. R. 1985. Three new Upper Cambrian stages for North America. Geology, 13:139143.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCollum, L. B. and Sundberg, F. A. 1999. Stop 9. Biostratigraphy of the traditional Lower-Middle Cambrian boundary interval in the outer shelf Emigrant Formation, Split Mountain East section, Esmeralda County, Nevada, p. 2934. In Palmer, A. R. (ed.), Laurentia 99, V Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group. Institute for Cambrian Studies, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
McCollum, L. B., and Sundberg, F. A. 2000. Cambrian Emigrant Formation: A highly condensed outer shelf sequence, Esmeralda County, Nevada. Geological Society of America Abstracts and Program, 32(7):A456.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1954. The faunas of the Riley Formation in central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 28:709786.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1960. Trilobites of the Upper Cambrian Dunderberg Shale. Eureka District, Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 344c, 109 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1965. Trilobites of the Late Cambrian Pterocephaliid Biomere in the Great Basin, United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 493, 105 p., 19 pls.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1998. A proposed nomenclature for stages and series for the Cambrian of Laurentia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 35:323–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, S., and Robison, R. A. 2000. Agnostid Biostratigraphy across the Middle-Upper Cambrian Boundary in Hunan China. Journal of Paleontology Memoir, 53, 104 p.Google Scholar
Peng, S., Babcock, L. E., Robison, R. A., Lin, H., Rees, M. N., and Saltzman, M. R. 2004. Global Standard Stratotype-section and Point (GSSP) of the Furongian Series and Paibian Stage (Cambrian). Lethaia, 37:365379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, B. R. 1992. Trilobites of the Marjuman and Steptoean stages (Upper Cambrian), Rabbitkettle Formation, southern Mackenzie Mountains, northwest Canada. Palaeontolographica Canadiana, 9, 179 p.Google Scholar
Roemer, F. 1849. Texas, mit besondered Rucksicht auf deutsche Auswanderrung und die physischen Verhaltniess des Landes, 14. Bonn, Germany, 464 p.Google Scholar
Shumard, B. F. 1861. The primordial zone of Texas, with descriptions of new fossils. American Journal of Science, 2nd series, 32:213221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. 2005. The Topazan Stage, a new Laurentian Stage (Lincolnian Series-Middle” Cambrian). Journal of Paleontology, 79:6371.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, F. A., and McCollum, L. B. 1997. Oryctocephalids (Corynexochida: Trilobita) of the Lower-Middle Cambrian boundary interval from California and Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 71:10651090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, F. A., and McCollum, L. B. 2003. Early to Mid-Cambrian trilobites of the outer shelf deposits of Nevada and California. Palaeontology, 42(5):945986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullberg, S. A. 1880. Om Agnostus-arterna I de Kambriska aflagringarne vid Andrarum. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, series C, 42:137.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1924. Cambrian and Lower Ozarkian trilobites, pt. 5, no. 2 of Cambrian geology and paleontology. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 75(3):5360.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, F. W. 1936. The Cambrian faunas of northeastern Australia, parts 1-2. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 11:59112.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. L. 1949. The trilobite fauna of the Elvinia Zone in the basal Wilberns Limestone of Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 23:2544.Google Scholar