Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:56:45.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Palaega rugosa, a new species of fossil isopod (Crustacea) from Maastrichtian rocks of Tunisia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Rodney M. Feldmann  and
Stijn Goolaerts
Rodney M. Feldmann
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242
Stijn Goolaerts
Affiliation:
Department of Geology-Geography, KU Leuven, Redigenstraat 16, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent, intensive collecting for Maastrichtian ammonites in Tunisia has yielded a single small isopod specimen from the Kalaat Senaan region. The isopod is a new species of Palaega Woodward, 1870 and appears to be the first representative of the genus to be recorded from the Maastrichtian of northern Africa.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 79 , Issue 5 , September 2005 , pp. 1031 - 1035
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrussow, N. 1887. On new Neogene Isopoda. Geological Magazine, n. s., Decade III, 4:189.Google Scholar
Bowman, T. E. 1971. Palaega lamnae, new species (Crustacea: Isopoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 45:540–541.Google Scholar
Calzada, S., and Gómez Pallerola, J. E. 1994. Un nuevo Isópod (Crustacea) de Sta. Maria de Meià. Batalleria, 4:27–30.Google Scholar
Carter, J. 1889. On fossil isopods, with a description of a new species. Geological Magazine, n. s., Decade III, 6:193–196, pl. 6.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1852. Crustacea. United States Exploring Expedition During the Years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842 Under the Command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., 13, 1,620 p.Google Scholar
de Zigno, A. 1881 [1880]. Annotazioni Paleontologiche. Nuove aggiunte alla fauna eocena del Veneto. Memorie Istituto Veneto, 21:775–789.Google Scholar
Dupuis, C., Steurbaut, E., Molina, E., Rauscher, R., Tribovillard, N., Arenillas, I., Arz, J. A., Robaszynski, F., Caron, M., Robin, E., Rocchia, R., and Lefèvre, I. 2000. The Cretaceous–Palaeogene (K/P) boundary in the Aïn Settara section (Kalaat Senan, Central Tunisia): Lithological, micropalaeontological and geochemical evidence. Bulletin de l'Institut des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, 71:169–190.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., Jagt, J. W. M., and Tshudy, D. M. 1990. Late Maastrichtian isopod and decapod Crustacea from Haccourt (Liège), northeastern Belgium. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst, 44:23–35.Google Scholar
Fraaye, R. H. B., and Summesberger, H. 1999. New crustacean records from the Late Campanian of the Gschliefgraben (Cretaceous, Austria). Beiträge zur Paläontologie, 24:1–6.Google Scholar
Gall, J.-C., and Grauvogel, L. 1971. Faune du Buntsandstein. IV.—Palaega pumila sp. nov., un isopode (Crustacé Eumalacostracé) du Buntsandstein des Vosges (France). Annales de Paléontologie (Invertébrés), 57:79–85.Google Scholar
George, R. Y. 1972. Biphasic moulting in isopod Crustacea and the finding of an unusual mode of moulting in the Antarctic genus Glyptonotus. Journal of Natural History, 6:651–656.Google Scholar
Hardenbol, J., Caron, M., Amédro, F., Dupuis, C., and Robaszynski, F. 1993. The Cenomanian–Turonian boundary in central Tunisia in the context of a sequence-stratigraphic interpretation. Cretaceous Research, 14:449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennebert, M., and Dupuis, C. 2003. Proposition d'une échelle chronométrique autour de la limite Crétacé-Paléogène par cyclostratigraphie: Coupe de l'Aïn Settara (Kalaat Senan, Tunisie centrale). Geobios, 36:707–718.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R. 1969. Peracarida, p. R360–R393. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. R. Arthropoda 4. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Imaizumi, R. 1953. Note on Bathynomus sp. (Crustacea) from the Miocene of Japan. Short Papers, Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Tohuku University, Sendai, 5:84–87.Google Scholar
International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature. 1992. Bathynomus A. Milne Edwards, 1879 (Crustacea, Isopoda): Given precedence over Palaega Woodward, 1870. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 49:86.Google Scholar
Karasawa, H. 1997. A monograph of Cenozoic stomatopod, decapod, isopod and amphipod Crustacea from west Japan. Monograph of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, number 8:1–81, 30 pls.Google Scholar
Karasawa, H., Nobuhara, T., and Matsuoka, K. 1992. Fossil and living species of the giant isopod genus Palaega Woodward, 1870 of Japan. Science Reports of the Toyohashi Museum of Natural History, 2:1–12.Google Scholar
Karasawa, H., Suzuki, A., and Kato, H. 1995. Bathynomus undecimspinosus (Karasawa, Nobuhara & Matsuoka, 1992) (Crustacea, Isopoda) from the Miocene Hidarimatagawa Formation of southwestern Hokkaido, Japan. Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 22:121–125.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1817. Les crustacés, les arachnids et les insects, p. 1–653. In Cuvier, G., Le règne animal distribué d'apres son organization, pour server de base à l'histoire naturelle et l'introduction à l'anatomie compare (first edition). Volume 3. D'éterville, Paris.Google Scholar
Malzahn, E. Von. 1968. Über einen neuen Isopoden aus dem Hauterive Nordwestdeutschlands. Geologisches Jahrbuch, 86:827–833.Google Scholar
Martins-Neto, R. G. 2001. Review of some Crustacea (Isopoda and Decapoda) from Brazilian deposits (Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic) with descriptions of new taxa. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia, 24:237–252.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, A. 1879. Sur un isopode gigantesque des grandes profondeurs de la mer. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, 83:21–23.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A. 1894. A new species of the isopod-genus Bathynomus. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, 1894:191–193.Google Scholar
Peryt, D., Alegret, L., and Molina, E. 2002. The Cretaceous/Palaeogene (K/P) boundary at Aïn Settara, Tunisia: Restructuring of benthic foraminiferal assemblages. Terra Nova, 14:101–107.Google Scholar
Quayle, W. J. 1982. A new Eocene isopod (Crustacea) from the Hampshire Basin. Tertiary Research, 4:31–34.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1935. Fossil Crustacea of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 2, 160 p.Google Scholar
Reiff, E. Von. 1936. Isopoden aus dem Lias Delta (Amaltheenschichten) Schwabens. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 18:49–90. pls. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Ristori, G. 1891. Contributo alla fauna carcinologica del Pliocene Italiano. Atti della Societá Toscana di Scienze Naturale Memoire, 11:1–25.Google Scholar
Robaszynski, F., Amédro, F., and Caron, M. 1993a. La limite Cénomanien–Turonien et la Formation Bahloul dans quelques localités de Tunisie Centrale. Cretaceous Research, 14:477–486.Google Scholar
Robaszynski, F., Caron, M., Amédro, F., Dupuis, C., Hardenbol, J., González Donoso, J. M., Linares, D., and Gartner, S. 1993b. Le Cénomanien de la région de Kalaat Senan (Tunisie Centrale): Litho-Biostratigraphie et interpretation séquentielle. Revue de Paléobiologie, 12:351–505.Google Scholar
Robaszynski, F., Hardenbol, J., Caron, M., Amédro, F., Dupuis, C., González Donoso, J. M., Linares, D., and Gartner, S. 1993c. Sequence stratigraphy in a distal environment: the Cenomanian of the Kalaat Senan region (Central Tunisia). Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine, 17:395–433.Google Scholar
Robaszynski, F., González Donoso, J. M., Linares, D., Amédro, F., Caron, M., Dupuis, C., Dhondt, A. V., and Gartner, S. 2000. Le Crétacé supérieur de la région de Kalaat Senan, Tunisie centrale. Lithobiostratigraphie intégrée: Zones d'ammonites, de foraminifères planctoniques et de nannofossiles du Turonien supérieur au Maastrichtien. Bulletin du Centre de Recherches et d'Exploration et Production d'Elf-Aquitaine, 22:359–490.Google Scholar
Robaszynski, F., Caron, M., Dupuis, C., Amédro, F., González Donoso, J. M., Linares, D., Hardenbol, J., Gartner, S., Calandra, F., and Deloffre, R. 1990. A tentative integrated stratigraphy in the Turonian of Central Tunisia: Formations, zones and sequential stratigraphy in the Kalaat Senan area. Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine, 14:213–384.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O. 1882. Revision auf Gruppen Isopoda Chelifera. Archiv for Mathematik og Naturvidenskab, 1882:1–54.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1986. Crustacea. Oxford University Press, New York, 606 p.Google Scholar
Secretan, S. 1975. Les crustacés du Monte Bolca. Studi e Ricerche sui Giacimenti Terziari di Bolca, II, Miscellanea Paleontologica, Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Verona, p. 315–388, pls. 1–37.Google Scholar
Secretan, S. 1976. Crustacés isopodes du Stampien de la Drôme. Annales de Paléontologie, Invertébrés, 62:87–99, pls. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Sismonda, E. 1846. Descrizione dei l'esci e dei Crostacci fossili neel Piemonte. Memorie della Reale Accademia deelle Scienze di Torino, serie 2a, 9:1–66.Google Scholar
Spassky, N. Y., and Kravtsov, A. G. 1976. The first find of an isopod in the Cenomanian of the Crimea. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 10:151–152. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Steurbaut, E., Dupuis, C., Arenillas, L., Molina, E., and Matmati, F. 2000. The Kalaat Senan section in central Tunisia: a potential reference section for the Danian/Selandian boundary, p. 158–160. In Schmitz, B., Sundquist, B., and Andreasson, F. P. (eds.), Early Paleogene Warm Climates and Biosphere Dynamics. Geologiska Föreningen har Flyttat, 122:158–160.Google Scholar
Stolley, E. 1910. Über zwie neue Isopoden aus norddeutschem Mesozoikum. Jahresbericht niedersächsisches Geologisches Verein, 6:191–216.Google Scholar
Van Straelen, V. 1928. Contribution a l'étude des isopodes meso- et cenozoïques. Mèmoires Academie Royal de Belgique, Classe de Sciences, series 2, 9:1–66.Google Scholar
Von Ammon, L. 1882. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der fossilen Assein. Sitzungberichte der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der Koniglichen Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 12:507–551.Google Scholar
Wieder, R. W., and Feldmann, R. M. 1989. Palaega goedertorum, a fossil isopod (Crustacea) from late Eocene to early Miocene rocks of Washington state. Journal of Paleontology, 63:73–80.Google Scholar
Wieder, R. W., and Feldmann, R. M. 1992. Mesozoic and Cenozoic fossil isopods of North America. Journal of Paleontology, 66:958–972.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1870. Contributions to British fossil Crustacea. Geological Magazine, 7:493–497, pl. 22.Google Scholar