Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:32:20.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The first remopleuridioidean trilobite and the earliest Parabolinella species recorded in the Furongian of Scandinavia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Fredrik Terfelt
Affiliation:
GeoBiosphere Science Centre, Department of Geology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden,
John Ahlgren
Affiliation:
Gärdesgatan 10, SE-542 43, Mariestad, Sweden,

Extract

The furongian of Mount Kinnekulle, Västergötland, Sweden (Fig. 1) is exposed in a number of road cuts, stream cuts, and abandoned alum shale quarries scattered around the mountain (e.g., Westergård, 1922, fig. 18; Müller and Hinz, 1991, fig. 2). Stratigraphically, the exposed successions span the Olenus gibbosus Zone through the Peltura paradoxa Zone (Fig. 2), and they have a maximum thickness of ca 12 m (Westergård, 1943). The strata consist of interfingering layers of alum shale and bituminous limestone (colloquially referred to as “orsten”). Trilobites, predominantly olenids, occur frequently throughout the succession, although they are generally restricted to the limestones. During an investigation of trilobites in the Lotagnostus americanus Zone (Fig. 2) at two localities on Kinnekulle, the second author (JA) recovered two unusual trilobites. After a closer examination they could be assigned to Elkanaspis Ludvigsen, 1982 and Parabolinella Br⊘gger, 1882, both of which are extremely rare in the Furongian of Scandinavia.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassler, R. S. 1915. Bibliographic index of American Ordovician and Silurian fossils. U.S. Natural Museum Bulletin, 92:11521.Google Scholar
Br⊘gger, W. C. 1882. Die Silurischen Etagen 2 und 3 im Kristianiagebiet und auf Eker, ihre Gliederung, Fossilien, Schichtenstörung und Contactmetamorphosen. Universitätprogramm für 2. Sem. 1882, Kristiania VIII + 376 pp.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten aus ihren lebenden Verwandten entwickelt; nebst einer systematischen Uebersicht aller zeither beschriebenen Arten. Georg Reimer, Berlin, 148 p. (In German)Google Scholar
Chen, J., Qian, Y., Lin, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Yin, L., and Erdtmann, B. D. 1985. Study on Cambrian-Ordovician boundary strata and its biotas in Dayangcha, Hunjiang, Jilin, China. China Prospect Publishing House, Beijing, 138 p.Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M. and Torsvik, T. H. 2002. Earth geography from 500 to 400 million years ago: A faunal and palaeomagnetic review. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 159:631644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, J., An, S., and Zhao, D. 1986. Cambrian-Ordovician boundary and its internal biotas, southern Jilin, northeast China. Journal of Changchun College of Geology, Special issue of Stratigraphy and Palaeontology, 135 p.Google Scholar
Ebbestad, J. O. R. 1999. Trilobites of the Tremadoc Bj⊘rkåsholmen Formation in the Oslo Region, Norway. Fossils and Strata, 47:1118.Google Scholar
Ergaliev, G. K. 1983. Certain Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobites of High Karatau and Ulutau. P. 3566. In Appolonov, M. K., Bandaletov, S. M., and Ivshin, N. K. (eds.), The Lower Palaeozoic stratigraphy and palaeontology of Kazakhstan, 176 p. Nauka Kazakh SSR Publishing House, Alma-Ata. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J. and Leanza, A. F. 1957. Ordovician trilobites of Argentina. Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Special Publication, 1: 1276.Google Scholar
Hawle, I. and Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der böhmischen Trilobiten. Abhandlungen Koeniglichen Boehmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. J. C. Calve, Prague, 176 p.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1957. The trilobite family Olenidae, with description of Norwegian material and remarks on the Olenid and Tremadocian Series. Skrifter utgitt av det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo, I. Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse, 1957(1): 1303.Google Scholar
Kaesler, R. L. (ed.). 1997. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. O, Arthropoda 1, Trilobita (revised). Volume 1. Introduction, order Agnostida, order Redlichiida. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 530 p.Google Scholar
Kim, D. H. and Choi, D. K. 2000. Jujuyaspis and associated trilobites from the Mungok Formation (Lower Ordovician), Yongwol, Korea. Journal of Paleontology, 74:10311042.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1936. Cambrian and Ordovician trilobites from northwestern Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 10:157167.Google Scholar
Kuo, H., Duan, J., and An, S. 1982. Cambrian-Ordovician boundary in the North China platform with descriptions of trilobites. Journal of Changchun College of Geology, 3:928. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Lake, P. 1913. A monograph of British Cambrian trilobites, Pt. IV, Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, p. 6588.Google Scholar
Lake, P. 1919. A monograph of British Cambrian trilobites, Pt. V, Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, p. 89120.Google Scholar
Landing, E., Westrop, S. R., and Keppie, J. D. 2007. Terminal Cambrian and lowest Ordovician of Mexican West Gondwana: Biotas and sequence stratigraphy of the Tiñu Formation. Geological Magazine, 144:909936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y. H. and Qian, Y. Y. 1983. Cambro-Ordovician trilobites from eastern Guizhou. Palaeontologia Cathayana, 1:1105.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. H., Zhou, Z., and Zhou, Z. Q. 1981. Cambrian-Ordovician boundary and their related trilobites in the Hangula region, W. nei Monggol. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, series 10, 2:122. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Lu, Y. H. and Lin, H. L. 1984. Late late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites of Jiangshan-Changshan area, Zhejiang, p. 45143. In Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica (ed.), Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of Systematic Boundaries in China, Cambrian - Ordovician Boundary (1). Anhui Science and Technology Publishing House, Hefei, 405 p.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R. 1982. Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobite biostratigraphy of the Rabbitkettle Formation, western District of Mackenzie. Life Sciences Contributions, Royal Ontario Museum, 134:1188.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., Westrop, S. R., and Kindle, C. H. 1989. Sunwaptan (Upper Cambrian) trilobites of the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland, Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana, 6:1175.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J. and Hinz, I. 1991. Upper Cambrian conodonts from Sweden. Fossils and Strata, 28:1153.Google Scholar
Peng, S. 1990. Trilobites from the Panjiazui Formation and the Madaoyu Formation in the Jiangnan Slope Belt. Beringeria, 2:55171.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1848. The Malvern Hills compared with the Palaeozoic districts of Abberley, Woolhope, May Hill, Torthworth, and Usk. Geological Survey Great Britain Memoirs, 2:1330.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1944. Upper Cambrian Trilobites from the Lévis conglomerate. Journal of Paleontology, 18:229258.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1945. New Upper Cambrian trilobites from the Lévis conglomerate. Journal of Paleontology, 19:462478.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1924. New Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobites from Vermont. Proceedings, Boston Society of Natural History, 37:389446.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. and Pantoja-Alor, J. 1968. Tremadocian trilobites from the Nochixtlán region, Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 42:767800.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. 1982. The biostratigraphy and correlation of the Merioneth-Tremadoc Series boundary in North Wales, P. 4159. In Basset, M. G. and Dean, W. T. (eds.), The Cambrian-Ordovician boundary: Sections, fossil distributions, and correlations. National Museum of Wales, Geological Series, 3, 227 p.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. 1988. Tremadoc trilobites from the Skiddaw Group in the English Lake District. Palaeontology, 31:677698.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A., Cocks, L. R. M., and Fortey, R. A. 2002. Upper Cambrian trilobites and brachiopods from Severnaya Zemlya, Arctic Russia, and their implications for correlation and biogeography. Geological Magazine, 139:281290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1866. On the fossils of North Wales. Appendix, P. 239363. In Ramsay, A. C. (ed.), The Geology of North Wales. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, 3, 381 p.Google Scholar
Terfelt, F., Eriksson, M. E., Ahlberg, P., and Babcock, L. E. 2008. Furongian Series (Cambrian) biostratigraphy of Scandinavia - a revision. Norwegian Journal of Geology, 88:7387.Google Scholar
Torsvik, T. H. 1998. Palaeozoic palaeogeography: A North Atlantic viewpoint. GFF, 120:109118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahlenberg, G. 1818. Petrificata telluris svecanae. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis, 8:1116. (In Latin)Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1922. Sveriges olenidskiffer. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Ca 18:1205. (In Swedish with English summary)Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1943. Den kambro-siluriska lagerserien. In Johansson, S., Sundius, N., and Westergård, A. H. (eds.), Beskrivning till kartbladet Lidköping. Sveriges geologiska Undersökning, Aa 182:2289. (In Swedish)Google Scholar
Westrop, S. R. 1995. Sunwaptan and Ibexian (Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician) trilobites of the Rabittkettle Formation, Mountain River region, northern Mackenzie Mountains, northwest Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana, 12:175.Google Scholar
Xiang, L. W. and Zhang, T. R. 1985. Stratigraphy and trilobite faunas of the Cambrian in the western part of northern Tianshan, Xinjiang. People's Republic of China, Ministry of Geology and mineral resources, series 2, 4: 1165. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Yin, G. Z. and Lee, S. J. 1978. Trilobita, P. 385594. Atlas of fossils of southwest China. Guizhou province. 1. Cambrian to Devonian. Geological Publishing House, Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar