No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
New Middle and Late Ordovician hyoliths from Estonia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 May 2016
Abstract
Hyolith assemblages from Middle and Upper Ordovician strata in Estonia include representatives of Hyolithes Eichwald as H. gerhardi new species and H. burgessi new species, and one assigned to that genus with question. Dorsolinevitus Syssoiev is known from D. marri new species, D. dispar? (Holm, 1893) and D. textilis? (Holm, 1893); one questionable species of that genus is left in open nomenclature. Sulcavitus Syssoiev is represented by one unidentifiable species, and one incompletely preserved orthothecid constitutes the first member of that group to be recorded from Estonia. Despite the overall paucity of identifiable hyoliths from Estonia, several of the same genera are now known to be present in Estonia and Sweden, reinforcing the notion that the hyoliths of Baltica constitute a distinct biogeographic province with limited mixing of faunas from elsewhere.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society
References
Baily, W. H.
1862. On the occurrence of some characteristic graptolites and other fossils, indicating certain divisions of the Lower Silurian rocks in the counties of Meath, Tipperary and Clare. Journal of the Geological Society, Dublin, 9:300–304.Google Scholar
Barrande, J.
1867. Système Silurien du centre de la Bohême, Volume 3, Classe des Mollusques, Ordre des Pteropodes. Published by the author in Prague and Paris, 179 p.Google Scholar
Berg-Madsen, V., and Malinky, J. M.
1999. A revision of Holm's late Mid and Late Cambrian hyoliths of Sweden. Palaeontology, 42:841–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, C.
1877. On a new area of Upper Cambrian rocks in south Shropshire, with a description of a new fauna. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 33:652–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, F.
1902. New and little known Victoria fossils in the National Museum, Melbourne, I. Some Palaeozoic species. Proceedings Royal Society of Victoria, New Series, 15:101–122.Google Scholar
von Eichwald, K. E.
1840. Über das silurische Schichtensystem in Esthland. Zeitschrift für Natur- und Heilkunde der königliche Medicinisch-chirurgische Akademie St. Petersburg, 1/2:1–210.Google Scholar
von Eichwald, K. E.
1860. Lethaea Rossica ou Paleontologie de la Russie. D. E. Schweizerbart, 1:1–1657, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. W.
1962. Small conoidal shells of uncertain affinities, p. W98–W143. In
Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. W, Miscellanea. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J.
1937. On some Ordovician fossils from northern Argentina. Geological Magazine, 74:97–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, H.
1875. On the succession of the ancient rocks in the vicinity of St. David's, Pembrokeshire, etc. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 31:167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, G.
1893. Sveriges Kambrisk-Siluriska Hyolithidae och Conulariidae. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Avhandlinger och uppsatser, Series C, 112:1–172.Google Scholar
Hynda, V. A.
1981. Nekotorye ordovikskie khiolity ugo-zapadnoi okrainy vostochno-evropeiskoi platformy. [Some Ordovician hyoliths of the south-western margin of the East-European platform.] Paleontologicheskii sbornik, 18:45–48. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Koken, E. F. R. K.
1889. Die Hyolithen der silurische Geschiebe. Deutsche geologische Gesellschaft Zeitschrift, 1889, 79–82.Google Scholar
Loi, A., Pillola, G. L., and Leone, F.
1996. La limite Cambrien-Ordovicien dans le SW de la Sardaigne: relations avec des événements eustatiques globaux. Comtes Rendus Académie des Sciences Paris, 323:881–888.Google Scholar
Malinky, J. M.
1988. Early Paleozoic Hyolitha from North America: reexamination of Walcott's and Resser's type specimens. Journal of Paleontology, 62(2):218–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinky, J. M.
1990a.
Solenotheca, new Hyolitha (Mollusca) from the Ordovician of North America. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 103:265–278.Google Scholar
Malinky, J. M.
1990b. Early and Middle Cambrian Hyolitha (Mollusca) from northeastern China. Journal of Paleontology, 64:228–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinky, J. M.
2002. A revision of Early to Mid Ordovician hyoliths from Sweden. Palaeontology, 45:511–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinky, J. M., and Berg-Madsen, V.
1999. A revision of Holm's Early and early Mid Cambrian hyoliths of Sweden. Palaeontology, 42:25–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinky, J. M., Linsley, R. M., and Yochelson, E. L.
1987. Taxonomic revision of Hyolitha from the Middle Paleozoic of North America. Journal of Paleontology, 61:1173–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Männil, R.
1990. The Ordovician of Estonia, p. 11–20. In
Kaljo, D. and Nestor, H. (eds.), Field Meeting Estonian 1990. An Excursion Guidebook. Estonian Academy of Sciences, Tallinn.Google Scholar
Marek, L.
1963. New knowledge on the morphology of Hyolithes
. Sborník geologických ved, rada Paleontologie, 1:53–72.Google Scholar
Marek, L.
1966. New hyolithid genera from the Ordovician of Bohemia. Časopis národního muzea, 135:89–92.Google Scholar
Marek, L.
1967. The class Hyolitha in the Caradoc of Bohemia. Sborník geologických ved, řada Paleontologie, 9:51–113.Google Scholar
Marek, L.
1976. The distribution of the Mediterranean Ordovician Hyolitha, p. 491–499. In
Bassett, M. G. (ed.), The Ordovician System: Proceedings of a Palaeontological Association Symposium. University of Wales Press and National Museum of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Marek, L.
1983a. The hyoliths in the Arenigian of Montagne Noire, p. 57–62. In
Courtessole, R., Marek, L., Pillet, J., Ubaghs, G., and Vizcaino, D. (eds.), Calymenina, Echinodermata et Hyolitha de l'Ordovicien inferieur la Montagne Noire (France meridionale). Memoir de la Société d'Etudes Scientifiques de l'Aude, Carcassonne.Google Scholar
Marek, L.
1983b. The Ordovician hyoliths of Anti-Atlas (Morocco). Sborník narodního muzea Praze, 39:1–36.Google Scholar
Marek, L.
1989. The hyoliths of the Králův Dvůr Formation (Bohemian Ordovician). Sborník geologických ved, řada Paleontologie, 30:37–59.Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, V. V.
1969. Descriptions of hyoliths, gastropods, hyolithelminths, camenids, and forms of an obscure systematic position, p. 105–175. In
Rozanov, V. Yu., Missarzhevsky, V. V., Volkova, L. G., Krylov, I. N., Keller, B. M., Korolyuk, I. K., Lendzion, K., Mikhynak, R., Pykhova, N. G., and Sidorov, A. D. (eds.), The Tommotian Stage and the Cambrian Lower Boundary Problem, (translated
Amerind, New Delhi, 1981).Google Scholar
Novák, O.
1891. Revision der palaeozoischen Hyolithiden Böhmens. Abhandlungen der mathematisch-naturwisschenschaftlichen Classe der böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, series
7(4):1–48.Google Scholar
Portlock, J. E.
1843. Report on the geology of the county of Londonderry and of parts of Tyrone and Fermanagh. Dublin, 784 p.Google Scholar
Pritchard, P. W.
1960. The Ordovician section in the Toko Range, p. 110–114. In
Hill, D. and Denmead, A. K. (eds.), The Geology of Queensland. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 7.Google Scholar
Yi, Qian. 1978. Hyoliths, worms, poriferans, p. 127–138. In
Sinian to Permian Stratigraphy and Palaeontology in the Eastern Part of the Yangtze Gorge. Geological Publishing House, Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Yi, Qian. 1989. Early Cambrian Small Shelly Fossils of China with Special Reference to the Precambrian-Cambrian Boundary. Nanjing University Publishing House, 341 p.Google Scholar
Raukas, A., and Teedumäe, A.
1997. Geology and Mineral Resources of Estonia. Estonian Academy Publishers, Tallinn, 436 p.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C.
1909. Lower Palaeozoic Hyolithidae from Girvan. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 47:203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, F. R. C.
1915. Supplementary memoir on new Ordovician and Silurian fossils from the northern Shan states. Palaeontologia Indica, New Series, 6:1–122.Google Scholar
Remelé, A.
1889. Ueber einige Glossophoren aus Untersilur-Geschieben des norddeutschen Diluviums. Theil II. Bemerkungen über Hyolithus acutus Eichwald. Zeitschrift der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, (1889), 41:762–770.Google Scholar
Roemer, F. A.
1876. Lethaea palõozoica oder Beschreibung und Abbildung für die einzeln Abtheilungen der palõozischen Formation bezeichnendsten Versteinerungen. Atlas. Schweizerbaryt'sche Verlagshandlungen (E. Koch), Stuttgart, 62 pls. (no text).Google Scholar
Roemer, F. A.
1885. Lethaea erratica oder Aufzõhlung und Beschreibung der in der norddeutschen ebene Vorkommenden Diluvial-Geschiebe nordischer Sedimentar-Gesteine. Palõontologische Abhandlungen Herausgegeben von W. Pames und E. Kayser, 2:1–173
(248–420).Google Scholar
Rouault, M.
1851. Mémoire sur la terrain paléozoique des environs de Rennes. Bulletin Societé géologique France, Series 2, 8:358–399.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W.
1864. On some new fossils from the Lingula-flags of Wales. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 20:233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W.
1866. On the fossils of North Wales. Appendix, p. 239–363. In
Ramsay, A. (ed.), The Geology of North Wales. Memoir Geological Survey of Great Britain, 3:239–263, 372–381.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W., and Blandford, H. F.
1865. Palaeontology of Niti in the northern Himalaya: being descriptions and figures of the Palaeozoic and Secondary fossils collected by Colonel Richard Strachey, R. E. O. T. Cutter. Military Orphan Press, Calcutta, 1–112.Google Scholar
Sharpe, D.
1853. Descriptions of new species of Zoophyta and Mollusca, p. 146–158. In
Ribeiro, C. (ed.), On the Carboniferous and Silurian Formations of the Neighbourhood of Bussaco in Portugal. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 9.Google Scholar
Stubblefield, C. J., and Bulman, O. M. B.
1927. The Shineton Shales of the Wrekin district; with notes on their development in other parts of Shropshire and Herefordshire. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 83:96–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A.
1957. K morfologii, sistematike i sistematicheskomu polozheniu khiolitiov [To the morphology, systematics and systematic position of the Hyolithoidea]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady, 116:304–307. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A.
1958. Nadotryad khiolitiov [The superorder Hyolithoidea]. In
Luppov, N. P. and Drushchits, V. V. (eds.), Osnovy Paleontologii, Molluski-golovonogie II. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, 2:184–190. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A.
1962. Khiolity kembriya severnogo sklona Aldanskogo shchita [Cambrian hyolithids from the northern slope of the Aldan shield]. AN SSSR, Yakutskij filial Sibirskogo otdeleniya, Yakutsk, 65 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Thoral, M.
1935. Contribution à l'étude géologique des monts de Lacaune et des terrains cambriens et ordoviciens de la Montagne Noire. Bulletin Service Carte géologique France, 38:319–637.Google Scholar
de Regny, P. Vianmassa
1927. Fossili ordoviciani. Sardini Royal Accademia Lincei Memoir, Seria 16, 2:437–496.Google Scholar
Waagen, W.
1885.
Productus limestone fossils, Pt. 5. Palaeontologia Indica, Series 13, 5:771–834.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P.
1878. Preliminary descriptions of new species of fossils from the lower geological formations of Wisconsin. Wisconsin Geological Survey Annual Report for 1877, 50–89.Google Scholar
Zázvorka, V.
1930. Revision of the hyoliths from dγ. Palaeontographica Bohemiae, 13, 22 p.Google Scholar