Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T15:38:11.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domatial dimorphism occurs in leperditellid and monotiopleurid ostracodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Robert F. Lundin ,
Mark Williams  and
David J. Siveter
Robert F. Lundin
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287
Mark Williams
Affiliation:
2Department of Geology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, England
David J. Siveter
Affiliation:
2Department of Geology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The discovery of domatial dimorphism in the leperditellid ostracode Loculocavata n. gen. and the monotiopleurid Primitiella minima (Harris), and the possibility that Leperditella Ulrich exhibits domatial dimorphism, requires a revision of the concept and/or diagnosis of the Platycopina. Domatial dimorphism is manifested by a special domiciliar space for egg/brood care in females. Domatia are represented by a loculate domiciliar wall or by a more generalized space bounded anteriorly by an interior partition caused by thickening or folding (sulcation) of the shell wall. Domatial dimorphism occurs in morphologically diverse ostracodes as shown by the podocopine Mesocyprideis, kloedenellids, cytherellids, monotiopleurids, the leperditellid Loculocavata n. gen., and by its possible occurrence in Hypotetragona and Leperditella. Changes in the present concept and/or diagnosis of the Platycopina are required to account for the above. Possible classifications range from restricting the Platycopina to holosolenic ostracodes with R/L overlap and domatial dimorphism to including within the Platycopina all groups that exhibit domatial dimorphism. The position of adductor muscle attachment in Loculocavata n. gen. and Primitiella minima (Harris) suggests that L2 may be the external expression of the position of adductor muscle attachment in some ostracodes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue 5 , September 1995 , pp. 886 - 896
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamczak, F. 1966. On kloedenellids and cytherellids (Ostracoda, Platycopa) from the Silurian of Gotland. Stockholm Contributions in Geology, 17:7–21.Google Scholar
Adamczak, F. 1967. Morphology of two Silurian metacope ostracodes from Gotland. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 88:462–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamczak, F. 1968. Palaeocopa and Platycopa (Ostracoda) from the Middle Devonian rocks in the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland. Stockholm Contributions in Geology, 17:1–109.Google Scholar
Adamczak, F. 1990. The crumina in Craspedobolbina Kummerow 1924 (Palaeocopa, Ostracoda). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 123:303–314.Google Scholar
Adamczak, F. 1991. Kloedenellids: morphology and relation to non-myodocopide ostracodes. Journal of Paleontology, 65:255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. 1968a. Gesclechtsdimorphismus bei ostracoden I. Natur und Museum, 98:47–56.Google Scholar
Becker, G. 1968b. Geschlechtsdimorphismus bei ostracoden II. Natur und Museum, 98:119–132.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G. 1933. On the feeding mechanism of certain marine ostracodes. Transactions, Royal Society of Edinburgh, 57:739–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, M. J. 1974. Middle Ordovician Ostracoda from southwestern District of Mackenzie. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 244, 55 p.Google Scholar
Decker, C. E. 1931. The stratigraphy and physical characteristics of the Simpson Group, p. 5–86. In Decker, C. E. and Merritt, C. A., The stratigraphy and physical characteristics of the Simpson Group. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Bulletin 55.Google Scholar
Fohrer, B. 1991. Verkieselte Flachwasserostracoden und ihre Begleitfauna und-Flora aus dem Oberkarbon der Karnischen Alpen (Nassfeld-Region). Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 46:1–107.Google Scholar
Gramm, M. N., and Egorov, G. I. 1972. Late Devonian Cavellina (Ostracoda) with separate receptacles for eggs. Nature, 238:267–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guber, A. L., and Jaanusson, V. 1964. Ordovician ostracodes with posterior domiciliar dimorphism. Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala, 43:1–43.Google Scholar
Harms, R. W. 1957. Ostracoda of the Simpson Group. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Bulletin 75, 333 p.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1953. Classification of Paleozoic straight-hinged ostracods. Norsk geologisk tidsskrift, 31:185–288.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1965. On certain features of palaeocope ostracodes. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 86:329–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaanusson, V. 1957. Middle Ordovician ostracodes of central and southern Sweden. Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala, 37:173–442.Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V. 1985. Functional morphology of the shell in platycope ostracodes: a study of arrested evolution. Lethaia, 18:73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornicker, L. S. 1963. Ecology and classification of Bahamian Cytherellidae (Ostracoda). Micropaleontology, 9:61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. A., and Moore, R. C. 1961. Family Leperditellidae Ulrich and Bassler, 1906, p. Q188–Q193. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. Q, Arthropoda 3, Crustacea, Ostracoda. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Lundin, R. F. 1964. Dimorphism in the thlipsurid ostracode Thlipsuroides striatopunctatus (Roth). Journal of Paleontology, 38:1099–1102.Google Scholar
Lundin, R. F. 1968. Ostracodes of the Haragan Formation (Devonian) in Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Bulletin 116, 121 p.Google Scholar
Lundin, R. F. 1987. On Glyptolichvinella spiralis (Jones & Kirkby). Stereo-Atlas of Ostracod Shells, 14:139–142.Google Scholar
Lundin, R. F. 1988. Is Neckajatia an ancestor of the platycope ostracodes?, p. 1051–1060. In Hanai, T., Ikeya, N., and Ishizaki, K. (eds.), Evolutionary Biology on Ostracoda, Its Fundamentals and Applications. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Ostracoda. Kodansha, Tokyo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundin, R. F., and Petersen, L. E. 1975. Thlipsura Jones and Holl: a redescription of the type species. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 65:87–107.Google Scholar
Lundin, R. F., and Visintainer, L. M. 1987. On Glyptolichvinella ovicella Lundin & Visintainer sp. nov. Stereo-Atlas of Ostracod Shells, 14:143–148.Google Scholar
Martinsson, A. 1962. Ostracodes of the family Beyrichiidae from the Silurian of Gotland. Publications of the Palaeontological Institution of the University of Uppsala, 41, 369 p.Google Scholar
Petersen, L. E., and Lundin, R. F. 1987. The British Silurian ostracod genus Octonaria Jones, 1887: its revision and phylogeny. Journal of Micropalaeontology, 6:77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schallreuter, R. E. L. 1967. Neue Ostracoden aus ordovizischen Geschieben. Geologie, 16:615–631.Google Scholar
Schallreuter, R. E. L. 1978. On Karinutatia crux gen. et sp. nov. Stereo-Atlas of Ostracod Shells, 5:45–48.Google Scholar
Schallreuter, R. E. L. 1986. On Bolbihithis abdominalis Schallreuter. Stereo-Atlas of Ostracod Shells, 13:145–148.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1961. Shell Morphology of Ostracoda, p. Q21–Q37. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. Q, Arthropoda 3, Crustacea, Ostracoda. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W., and Wainwright, J. 1961. Dimorphism of Ostracoda, p. Q37–Q43. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. Q, Arthropoda 3, Crustacea, Ostracoda. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Sohn, I. G. 1971. New late Mississippian ostracode genera and species from northern Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 711-A, 24 p.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Bassler, R. S. 1906. New American Paleozoic Ostracoda. Notes and descriptions of Upper Carboniferous genera and species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 30:149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Bassler, R. S. 1908. New American Paleozoic Ostracoda. Preliminary revision of the Beyrichiidae, with descriptions of new genera. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 35:277–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Morkhoven, F. P. C. M. 1963. Post-Paleozoic Ostracoda. Volume II. Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 478 p.Google Scholar
Warshauer, S. M., and Berdan, J. M. 1982. Palaeocopid and podocopid Ostracoda from the Lexington Limestone and Clays Ferry Formation (Middle and Upper Ordovician) of central Kentucky. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1066-H, 80 p.Google Scholar
Williams, M. 1990. Ostracoda (Arthropoda) of the middle Ordovician Simpson Group, Oklahoma, U.S.A. Unpubl. , University of Leicester, Leicester, England, Volume 1, p. 1–194, Volume 2, Plates 1-43.Google Scholar
Wouters, K., and Martens, K. 1992. Contribution to the knowledge of Tanganyikan cytheraceans, with the description of Mesocyprideis nom. nov. (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Bulletin van het Koninklijk Belgisch voor Natuurwetenschappen, Biologie, 62:159–166.Google Scholar