Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-wgjn4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-13T23:48:00.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three-Wave Mutual-Checking Method for Data Processing of SHPB Experiments of Concrete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2014

T.-T. Wang  and
B. Shang
T.-T. Wang
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Physics, Hubei Polytechnic University, Hubei, China
B. Shang*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Physics, Hubei Polytechnic University, Hubei, China
*
*shang@mail.ustc.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

Two-wave methods and Three-wave method are conventional methods to process the SHPB experiment data. Due to the presence of transient waves in dynamic experiments, both the stress and strain fields within a specimen are seldom absolutely uniform. Different date processing methods lead to different results. In this paper, we have developed a program to compare the results getting from different methods. The difference of the strains corresponding to the ultimate stress can reach 20%. Which one is better? One material shouldn't have different constitutive. In order to solve the problem, we have developed Three-wave mutual-checking method, which is based on the conservation of the momentum of the whole system. This method provides a checking mechanism, so some human error can be avoided when process the same experiment data. By this method, different person can obtain the only credible stress-strain curve based on the same test data.

Keywords

SHPBThree-wave mutual-checking methodData processingConcrete
Type
Technical Note
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 30 , Issue 5 , October 2014 , pp. N5 - N10
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Rong, Z. D., Sun, W. and Zhang, Y. S., “Dynamic Compression Behavior of Ultra-High Performance Cement Based Composites,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 37, pp. 515–520 (2010).Google Scholar
2.Zhang, Q. M., Gu, Z. M., Chen, L., Wang, X. Y. and Hu, S. S., “Experimental Study on Dynamic Compression of Nylon Reinforced Concrete,” Key Engineering Materials, 326-328, pp. 1581–1584 (2006).Google Scholar
3.Tai, Y. S., “Uniaxial Compression Tests at Various Loading Rates for Reactive Powder Concrete,” Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 52, pp. 14–21 (2009).Google Scholar
4.Zhang, M., Wu, H. J., Li, Q. M. and Huang, F. L., “Further Investigation on the Dynamic Compressive Strength Enhancement of Concrete-Like Materials Based on Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Tests. Part I: Experiments,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36, pp. 1327–1334 (2009).Google Scholar
5.Li, Q. M., Lu, Y. B. and Meng, H., “Further Investigation on the Dynamic Compressive Strength Enhancement of Concrete-Like Materials Based on Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Tests. Part II: Numerical Simulations,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36, pp. 1335–1345 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Zhu, J.Hu, S. S. and Wang, L. L., “An Analysis of Stress Uniformity for Concrete-Like Specimens During Shpb Tests,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36, pp. 61–72 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Mohr, D., Gary, G. and Lundberg, B., “Evaluation of Stress-Strain Curve Estimates in Dynamic Experiments,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 37, pp. 161–169 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Song, B., Chen, W. N. and Luk, V., “Impact Compressive Response of Dry Sand,” Mechanics of Materials, 41, pp. 777–785 (2009).Google Scholar
9.Song, B. and Chen, W., “Dynamic Compressive Response and Failure Behavior of an Epoxy Syntactic Foam,” Journal of Composite Materials, 38, pp. 915–936 (2004).Google Scholar
10.Song, B., Syn, C. J., Grupido, C. L., Chen, W. and Lu, W. Y., “A Long Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (Lshpb) for Intermediate-Rate Characterization of Soft Materials,” Experimental Mechanics, 48, pp. 809–815 (2008).Google Scholar
11.Song, B., Chen, W. and Jiang, X., “Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Experiments on Polymeric Foams,” International Journal of Vehicle Design, 37, pp. 185–198 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Lee, O. S., Hwang, S. W., Choi, H. B., Kim, D. H. and Kim, H. M., “Dynamic Deformation of Aluminum Alloys at High Temperature by Using Shpb Techniques,” Dymat 2009: 9th International Conference on the Mechanical and Physical Behaviour of Materials under Dynamic Loading, 1, pp. 443–448 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Shang, B., Hu, S. S. and Jiang, X. Q., “A Three-Wave Coupling Method for Data Treatment in SHPB Experiments with Metal Samples,” Explosion and Shock Waves, 30, pp. 429–432 (2010).Google Scholar
14.Bertholf, L. D. and Karnes, C. H., “2-Dimensional Analysis of Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar System,” Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 23, pp. 1–19 (1975).Google Scholar