Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:11:42.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase relationships in the Ti–Si–C system at high pressures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

S. Sambasivan  and
W.T. Petuskey
S. Sambasivan*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1604
W.T. Petuskey
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1604
*
a)Present address: Visiting Scientist, Wright Laboratories/Materials Directorate, Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433.
Get access

Abstract

The compatibility of phases in the Ti–Si–C system was studied for pressures from 10 to 20 kbars (1 to 2 GPa) and temperatures from 1200 °C to 1500 °C via an interfacial reaction between titanium and silicon carbide. The interface was characterized by backscattered electron imaging and electron probe microanalysis. Ti3Si was stabilized at high pressures exhibiting an appreciable solubility for carbon (up to 9 at. %). At higher temperatures and lower pressures, it decomposed to Ti5Si3, Ti(Si, C), and TiCx according to the relation Ti3Si (Cz) = (0.70588)TiCx + (0.32437)Ti5Si3 + (0.67227)Ti (Si, C), where the mathematical coefficients were calculated using z = 0.4 and x = 0.5. No detectable quantities of carbon dissolved in Ti5Si3 under these conditions. A clapeyron slope of 0.08 (±0.01) kbar/K was measured for this reaction. The microstructure of the reaction zone and other general thermodynamic and kinetic characteristics are discussed for different experimental conditions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 6 , June 1992 , pp. 1473 - 1479
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.van, F. J. J. Loo, Smet, F. M., and Rieck, G. D., High Temp.-High Press. 14, 25 (1982).Google Scholar
2.Martineau, P., Pailler, R., Lahaye, M., and Naslain, R., J. Mater. Sci. 19, 2749 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Morozumi, S., Endo, M., and Kikuchi, M., J. Mater. Sci. 20, 3976 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Pailler, R., Martineau, P., Lahaye, M., and Naslain, R., Rev. Chim. Mineral. 18, 520 (1981).Google Scholar
5.Chamberlain, M. B., Thin Solid Films 72, 305 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.House, L. J., Thesis, May 1979, George Washington University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
7.Backhaus-Ricoult, M., Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 93, 1277 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ratliff, J. L. and Powell, G. W., AFML Tech. Rep. 70–42, 1970, U.S. Dept. of Comm., Nat. Tech. Inf. Serv., Springfield, VA.Google Scholar
9.Sambasivan, S. and Petuskey, W. T., to be published.Google Scholar
10.Patera, S. and Holloway, J. R., EOS Trans. AGU 59, 1217 (1978).Google Scholar
11.Sambasivan, S. and Petuskey, W. T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc, submitted.Google Scholar
12.Murray, J. L., in Phase Diagrams of Binary Titanium Alloys (ASM Press, Metals Park, OH, 1987), pp. 47–51.Google Scholar
13.Brukl, C. E., AFML Tech. Rep., AFML-TR-65–2, Pt. II, Vol. VII, Air Force Materials Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH (1966).Google Scholar
14.Brewer, L., J. Mater. Educ. 6, 733 (1984).Google Scholar
15.Murray, J. L., in Phase Diagrams of Binary Titanium Alloys (ASM Press, Metals Park, OH, 1987), pp. 289–294.Google Scholar
16.Heikinheimo, E., Kivilahti, J., and Pajunen, M., in Microbeam Analysis, edited by Newbury, D. E. (San Francisco Press, 1988), pp. 509–510.Google Scholar
17.Teysanndier, F., Ducarroir, M., and Bernard, C., CALPHAD 8, 233 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Schlesinger, M., Chem. Rev. 90, 607 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Sambasivan, S., Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 1990.Google Scholar