Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:21:57.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Latin American Intellectuals and the City, 1860–1940*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Richard M. Morse
Richard M. Morse
Affiliation:
Revised version of a paper presented at the Sixth Symposium on Latin American Urbanisation at the 42nd International Congress of Americanists, Paris, 2-9 Sept., 1976.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Given the historic role of cities in Latin America as an instrument for appropriating territory and for ordering society, one may wonder why more attention is not paid to the Latin Americans' own vision of the city. We are sometimes asked to believe that only in the 1940s did the urban phenomenon loom in their world and that our knowledge of it comes from foreign demographers and anthropologists. Colonial sources like Solórzano and the Recopilación, however, demonstrate that the IberoCatholic political tradition gives central importance to the organizational and paradigmatic functions of the urban unit. After independence, to be sure, this tradition was eclipsed by the ‘ruralization’ of Latin American societies as urban, bureaucratic structures decayed and power flowed to the agrarian domain. At this time also, intellectual horizons opened to offer release from scholastic constraints, encouraging the intelligentsia to make eclectic, sometimes euphoric assessments of their new nations' future potential. Of these pensadores Sarmiento almost alone dealt directly with the city's role in nation building. Yet his very plea that the city — whether Buenos Aires or a new ‘Argirópolis’ — assume ‘modernizing’ or ‘developmental‘functions reverts to the old Mediterranean notion that the city (civitas) is one with ‘civilization’. For this Alberdi attacked him, reminding Sarmiento that in Argentina town and country, civilization and barbarism, were not disjoined but fused in a single society and polity.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , November 1978 , pp. 219 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See my article ‘The City-Idea in Argentina, a Study in Evanescence’, Journal of Urban History 2, No. 3 (1976) pp. 311–15.Google Scholar

2 For literary evocations of Latin American cities, including the ciudades patricias and subsequent ciudades burguesas of the nineteenth century, see Romero, José Luis, Latinoamérica: las ciudades y las ideas (Buenos Aires, 1976).Google Scholar

3 ‘Ensayo sobre el verdadero estado de la cuestión social y politica que se agita en la República Mexicana’ in Otero, Mariano, Obras (2 vols., Mexico City, 1967), 1, 3–94.Google Scholar

4 Samper's, MiguelLa miseria en Bogotá (1867) and its sequel, Retrospecto (1896), are found in his Escritos polisico-económicos (4 vols., Bogotá, 1925–1927), 1, 7–193.Google Scholar A modern edition is La miseria en Bogotá y otros escritos (Bogotá, 1969).Google Scholar For Samper's thought, see Uribe, Jaime Jaramillo, El pensamiento colombiano en el siglo XIX (Bogotá, 1964), pp. 246–55.Google Scholar

5 For Saint-Simon the ‘final battle’ was ‘not between the oppressed and the oppressors, but between the workers of all classes and the idlers, the lumpenproletariat, the aristocracy and the officers of old religion, bastards of all classes and the bastards among classes’. Hawthorn, Geoffrey, Enlightenment and Despair, a History of Sociology (Cambridge, 1976), p.71.Google Scholar

6 Capelo, Joaquín, Sociologla de Limo (4 vols., Lima, 1895–1902).Google Scholar For a selection from this work and an introduction to Capelo's thought, see Capelo, Joaquin, Limo en 1900, essudio critico y antologla, Morse, Richard M. (ed.), (Lima, 1973).Google Scholar

7 Capelo inverted Spencer's formula in an article of 1909 entitled ‘Do we struggle to live or live to struggle?’, Bondy, Augusto Salazar, Historia de las ideas en el Perd contempordneo (2nd ed., 2 vols., Lima, 1967), 1, 97.Google Scholar

/8 For the vogue of bio-organismic theories, see Sorokin, Pitirim A., Contemporary Sociological Theories (New York, 1928), pp. 200–207.Google Scholar

9 La ciudad indiana appears in García, Juan Agustín, Obras cormpletas (2 vols., Buenos Aires, 1955), 1, 283–475.Google Scholar

10 See García's, ‘Ciencias sociales’ in the Obras, 1, 79–282.Google Scholar In Sociología argentina (7th ed., Buenos Aires, 1946), pp. 115–29, José Ingenieros called García a systematic economic determinist. Ricardo Levene refuted this, calling García's interpretation ‘predominantly psychological’ in Historia de las ideas sociales argentinas (Buenos Aires, 1947), pp. 203–38.Google Scholar

11 Brooke, Michael Z., Le Play: Engineer and Social Scientist (London, 1970), pp. 77–79.Google Scholar

12 Bender, Thomas, Toward an Urban Vision, ideas and institutions in Nineteenth Century America (Lexington, Kentucky, 1975).Google Scholar

13 See especially Brace, Charles Loring, The Dangerous Classes of New York, and Twenty Years' Work among Them (Washington, D.C., original ed. 1872)Google Scholar and Olmsted, Frederick Law, Civilizing American Cities, ed. by Sutton, S.B. (Cambridge, Mass., 1971).Google Scholar

14 Bender, Urban Vision, p. 192.

15 Sayre, Wallace S. and Poisby, Nelson W., ‘American Political Science and the Study of Urbanization’ in Hauser, Philip M. and Schnore, Leo F. (ed.), The Study of Urbanization (New York, 1965), pp. 115–23.Google Scholar

16 See Martindale, Don, The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory (Cambridge, Mass., 1960), pp. 51–77.Google Scholar

17 Gouldner, Alvin W., The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology (New York, 1970), p. 100.Google Scholar

18 Soler, Ricaurte, El posivismo argentino (Buenos Aires, 1968), p. 227.Google Scholar

19 Freyre, Gilberto, Sociologia, introduça¯o ao estudo dos seus princlpios (4th ed., 2 vols., Rio de Janeiro, 1967), 1, 79–80.Google Scholar

20 Basadre is a circumspect admirer, but never an idolater, of Mariátegui. See his introduction to the English translation of Mariátegui's Seven Interpretive Essays on the Peruvian Reality (Austin, Texas, 1971) and his reflections in the Conversaciones with Pablo Macera (Lima, 1974), pp. 92–6.Google Scholar

21 In The Ceque System of Cuzco (Leiden, 1962) Reiner Tom Zuidema proposes that Cuzco society should be understood as a reworking of village kinship structures rather than as an Incaic counterpart to the ‘rational’ order of ancient Mediterranean cities.

22 Woodrow Borah reviews the literature dealing with distinctive features of early Latin American town planning in ‘European Cultural Influence in the Formation of the First Plan for Urban Centers that has Lasted to our Time’ in Instituto de Peruanos, Estudios, Urbanización y proceso social en America (Lima, 1972), pp. 35–54.Google Scholar

23 See the taxonomy presented by Houston, J.H, ‘The Foundation of Colonial Towns in Hispanic America’ in Beckinsale, R.P and Houston, J.H (eds.), Urbanization and its Problems (Oxford, 1968), pp. 372, 380,Google Scholar and the functional analysis proposed by Hardoy, Jorge E. and Aranovich, Carmen in ‘Urban Scales and Functions in Latin America toward the year 1600: First Conclusions’, Latin American Research Review 5, No. 3 (1970), 57–91.Google Scholar

24 See my discussion of the historic importance of the Latin American ‘Patrimonial capital city as an instrument of development’ in ‘Planning, History, Politics’ in Miller, John and Gakenheimer, Ralph A. (eds.), Latin American Urban Policies and the Social Sciences (Beverly Hills, 1971), pp. 189–200.Google Scholar The ‘patrimonial’ character of such contemporary cases as Ciudad Guayana and Brasilia is readily appreciated in the view from beneath; see Peattie, Lisa R., The View from the Barrio (Ann Arbor, 1968)Google Scholar and Epstein, David G., Brasilia, Plan and Reality (Berkeley, 1973).Google Scholar

25 See Spalding, Karen, ‘The Colonial Indian: Past and Future Research Perspectives’, Latin American Research Review 7, No. 1 (1972), 47–76Google Scholar and Wachtel, Nathan, ‘La desestructuración económica y social del mundo andino’ in his Sociedad e ideología (Lima, 1973), pp. 79–162.Google Scholar

26 In articles and position papers since the 1960s urban researchers at the Centro de Estudios Urbanos y Regionales in Buenos Aires have done much to give ecological analysis a political dimension; see also Nos. 1–8 of the journal EURE, Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Urbano Regionales (Santiago, Chile, 1970–1973). Carlos de la Torre offers a Cuban critique of ‘bourgeois’ location theory in ‘Génesis y desarrollo de la teoróa de la localización’, Revista Interamericana de Planificación 8, Nos. 28–29 (1973–7), 63–79.

27 But note that Torcuato Di Tella complemented his taxonomic review of ‘Populism and Reform in Latin America’, in Wliz, Claudio (ed.), Obstacles to Change in Latin America (London, 1965), pp. 47–74,Google Scholar with a focused historical study of ‘The Dangerous Classes in Early Nineteenth Century Mexico’, Journal of Latin American Studies 5, No. 1 (1973), 79–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 For orientation and bibliography see Earle, Peter G., Prophet in the Wilderness, the Works of Ezequiel Martinez Estrada (Austin, Texas, 1971).Google Scholar

29 Estrada, Ezequiel Martínez, Leer y escribir (Mexico City, 1969), pp. 231–6.Google Scholar