Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:56:50.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of the uncinate process in sinusitis aetiology: isolated agenesis versus maxillary sinus hypoplasia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2015

S Uluyol*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
İ B Arslan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
A Demir
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Basaksehir State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
G C Mercan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
O Dogan
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
İ Çukurova
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Dr S Uluyol, Tepecik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi KBB Klinigi, Gaziler cad. No: 468, 35170 Yenisehir Izmir, Turkey Fax: +90 232 4330756 E-mail: sinanuluyol@hotmail.com

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of maxillary sinus hypoplasia and isolated agenesis of the uncinate process in sinusitis aetiology.

Methods:

Three patients with isolated agenesis of the uncinate process and 27 patients with 43 maxillary sinus hypoplasia variations were recruited. The frequencies of sinusitis episodes and radiological findings were compared between patient subgroups.

Results:

In all, 23 type I maxillary sinus hypoplasia, 13 type II maxillary sinus hypoplasia and 7 type III maxillary sinus hypoplasia variations were detected. Patients with isolated agenesis of the uncinate process underwent antibiotic treatment an average of 7 times per year, whereas those with types I, II and III maxillary sinus hypoplasia were treated 1.57, 3.22, and 5.75 times per year, respectively, over a 5-year period. The antibiotic treatment frequency for patients with isolated agenesis of the uncinate process was significantly higher than for those with types I and II maxillary sinus hypoplasia.

Conclusion:

Isolated agenesis of the uncinate process seems to play a stronger role than types I and II maxillary sinus hypoplasia in the pathophysiology of chronic sinusitis.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Sirikci, A, Bayazit, Y, Gümüsburun, E, Bayram, M, Kanlikama, M. A new approach to the classification of maxillary sinus hypoplasia with relevant clinical implications. Surg Radiol Anat 2000;22:243–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Milczuk, HA, Dalley, RW, Wessbacher, FW, Richardson, MA. Nasal and paranasal sinus anomalies in children with chronic sinusitis. Laryngoscope 1993;103:247–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Erdem, T, Aktas, D, Erdem, G, Miman, MC, Ozturan, O. Maxillary sinus hypoplasia. Rhinology 2002;40:150–3Google ScholarPubMed
4Tasar, M, Cankal, F, Bozlar, U, Hidir, Y, Saglam, M, Ors, F. Bilateral maxillary sinus hypoplasia and aplasia: radiological and clinical findings. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:412–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Bolger, WE, Woodruff, WW Jr, Morehead, J, Parsons, DS. Maxillary sinus hypoplasia: classification and description of associated uncinate process hypoplasia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;103:759–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Bassiouny, A, Newlands, WJ, Ali, H, Zaki, Y. Maxillary sinus hypoplasia and superior orbital fissure asymmetry. Laryngoscope 1982;92:441–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Aksungur, EH, Biçakçi, K, Inal, M, Akgül, E, Binokay, F, Aydogan, B et al. CT demonstration of accessory nasal turbinates: secondary middle turbinate and bifid inferior turbinate. Eur J Radiol 1999;31:174–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Okur, E, Okur, N, Aksungur, EH, Kiroğlu, M, Inal, M, Soyupak, S. Aplasia of bilateral uncinate processes with a bilateral nasomaxillary cavity. Eur J Radiol 2001;38:47–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Earwaker, J. Anatomic variants in sinonasal CT. Radiographics 1993;13:381415CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Jiang, GL, Xu, G. Change of airflow patterns inside the maxillary sinus influenced by uncinate process [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2009;44:460–3Google ScholarPubMed
11Xiong, GX, Li, JF, Zhan, JM, Jiang, GL, Rong, LW, Xu, G. Influence of uncinate process on aerodynamic characteristics of nasal cavity and maxillary sinus [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2009;44:1015Google ScholarPubMed