Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Ossicular chain mobilisation versus reconstruction in surgery for isolated malleus and/or incus fixation: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • W L Crutcher (a1), P Tassone (a1) and S Pelosi (a1)

Abstract

Objective

To compare post-operative audiometric outcomes for the two prevailing surgical approaches for isolated malleus and/or incus fixation: ossicular mobilisation with preservation of the ossicular chain, and disruption and reconstruction of the ossicular chain.

Methods

A search was conducted, in December 2016, of PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature articles written in English. Papers presenting original data regarding post-operative audiometric outcomes in patients who underwent surgical treatment for malleus and/or incus fixation with a mobile and intact stapes were included. A risk of bias assessment was performed on the 14 selected papers and a tier system was developed. Meta-analysis was accomplished by comparing pooled rates of surgical success by chi-square test and calculating odds ratios by logistical regression. Analysis was performed using Revman5 and R software.

Results and conclusion

Analysis of the literature revealed no differences in audiometric outcomes between ossicular chain mobilisation and ossicular chain reconstruction in patients with isolated malleus and/or incus fixation. A large, prospective study comparing both short- and long-term hearing results for ossicular chain mobilisation and ossicular chain reconstruction in this population may identify whether a difference in outcomes exists between the two approaches.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Dr William L Crutcher, 317 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA E-mail: wxc023@jefferson.edu

Footnotes

Hide All

Dr W L Crutcher takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

Presented as a poster at the Pennsylvania Association of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Annual Scientific Meeting, 16 June 2017, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1Subotic, R, Mladina, R, Risavi, R. Congenital bony fixation of the malleus. Acta Otolaryngol 1998;118:833–6
2Vincent, R, Lopez, A, Sperling, NM. Malleus ankylosis: a clinical, audiometric, histologic, and surgical study of 123 cases. Am J Otol 1999;20:717–25
3Seidman, MD, Babu, S. A new approach for malleus/incus fixation: no prosthesis necessary. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:669–73
4Katzke, D, Plester, D. Idiopathic malleus head fixation as a cause of a combined conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1981;6:3944
5Armstrong, BW. Epitympanic malleus fixation: correction without disrupting the ossicular chain. Laryngoscope 1976;86:1203–8
6Tos, M. Bony fixation of the malleus and incus. Acta Otolaryngol 1970;70:95104
7Teunissen, E, Cremers, CW. Surgery for congenital anomalies of the middle ear with mobile stapes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993;250:327–31
8Harris, JP, Mehta, RP, Nadol, JB. Malleus fixation: clinical and histopathological findings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111:246–54
9Guilford, FR, Anson, BJ. Osseous fixation of the malleus. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1967;71:398407
10Martin, C, Oletski, A, Prades, JM. Surgery of idiopathic malleus fixation. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:165–9
11Albu, S, Babighian, G, Trabalzini, F. Surgical treatment of tympanosclerosis. Am J Otol 2000;21:631–5
12Tierney, JF, Stewart, LA, Ghersi, D, Burdett, S, Sydes, MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 2008;8:16
13Higgins, JP, Green, S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0. Copenhagen: Cochrane Collaboration, 2011;section 7.7.7.3
14Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan), version 5.3 [computer program]. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, 2014
15Kirkwood, BR, Sterne, JA. Essential Medical Statistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 2003;414,425
16Higgins, JP, Green, S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0. Copenhagen: Cochrane Collaboration, 2011;section 9.5.2
17Sakalli, E, Celikyurt, C, Guler, B, Biskin, S, Tansuker, HD, Erdurak, SC. Surgery of isolated malleus fixation due to tympanosclerosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:3663–7
18Shea, JJ. Plastipore total ossicular replacement prosthesis. Laryngoscope 1976;86:239–40
19Goldenberg, RA, Emmet, JR. Current use of implants in middle ear surgery. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:145–52
20Sennaroglu, L, Gungor, V, Atay, G, Ozer, S. Manubrio-stapedioplasty: new surgical technique for malleus and incus fixation due to tympanosclerosis. J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:587–90
21Stankovic, MD. Hearing results of surgery for tympanosclerosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:635–40
22Emmett, JR, Shea, JJ. Surgical treatment of tympanosclerosis. Laryngoscope 1978;88:1642–8
23Çelik, H, Felek, SA, Islam, A, Arslan, N, Demirci, M, Haberal Can, I. The effect of mobility of ossicles and surgical approach on hearing results in patients with tympanosclerosis. Mediterr J Otol 2008;4:184–90

Keywords

Ossicular chain mobilisation versus reconstruction in surgery for isolated malleus and/or incus fixation: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • W L Crutcher (a1), P Tassone (a1) and S Pelosi (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed