^{page 120 note 1} A few additions and corrections by way of a footnote. On pp. 36, n. 3 and 57, n. 1 one misses a reference to Plut., , Mor., 581Google Scholar D and above all to Theag., 129 c, a passage which proves not the genuineness of the dialogue (so Friedlaender, Plato, II, 1930, pp. 153–4), but the relatively early date of its origin, or rather of the sources on which its author drew.—P. 57 (and p. 211), on the question of AIc. and τὸ φιλόπολι, cf. Larsen, loc. cit., p. 146, and Pusey's article there quoted (besides Finley, loc. cit., p. 288, n. 2).— Pp. 77 ff.: for the policy of Nicias in 421 and the following years, see Westlake, H. D., AJPh, LXI, 1940, pp. 414 ff.Google Scholar— P. 122, n. 5 (cf. p. 354), one misses a reference to the refusal of Argos to extradite the Athenian refugees in 404–3 (Diod., XIV, 6, 2; Dem., XV, 22–3; Just., V, 9, 4–5; cf. Cloché, P., RÉG, XXXI, 1918, pp. 321–2)Google Scholar.—P. 137, n. 7; Only because of a misprint (cf. pp. 204, n. 4; 338, n. 7; and Riv. Fil., 1937, pp. 114 ff.Google Scholar) is the birth of Alcibiades junior dated to 427 B.C—P. 208, n. 1. The reference to Bikerman's article is Rev. Phil., LXIII, 1937, p. 59Google Scholar. P. 293, n. 1. One misses a reference to Accame, S., Riv. Fil., N.S., XIII, 1935, pp. 349 ff.Google Scholar Finally, one regrets the uncertainties of H. in dating Isocrates's sixteenth oration (cf. pp. 11; 21; 140, n. 4; 340, n. 3), and his consequent failure to stress the dependence on it of Lysias XIV (cf. p. 19). Nor does he mention anywhere the very interesting Alcibiades-Papyrus: Pap. Oxy., III, no. 11.