No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2020
This paper re-examines Theophrastus’ Metaphysics 11a18–26, an obscure testimony about Speusippus, the second head of the Platonic Academy. As opposed to the traditional interpretation, which takes this passage as Theophrastus’ polemic against Speusippus’ doctrine of value, I argue that he here makes dialectical use of, rather than launching an attack on, the Platonist. Based on this new reading, I further propose a revision and a reassessment of the ‘gloomy metaphysics’ of Speusippus which will shed new light on his ethics.
cheng.wei@pku.edu.cn. My gratitude goes to Tianqin Ge, Yiwen Zhan and Ruobing Xian for their helpful comments on earlier drafts, to Xiaohui Yu for editing the manuscript and especially to Rhodes Pinto, who has greatly helped me improve this article in many aspects. I would like to thank Stephen Menn for allowing me to quote his unpublished monograph and Lijuan Lin, Ruizhi Ma and Oliver Overwien for their support in understanding the Arabic tradition. I am also deeply indebted to Douglas Cairns and two anonymous referees for their insightful remarks, criticisms and advice. I acknowledge the support of the Institute of Foreign Philosophy and the Department of Philosophy at Peking University.