Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-wgjn4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T05:13:29.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 1973 Chilean coup and the origins of transnational human rights activism*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2013

Patrick William Kelly
Patrick William Kelly*
Affiliation:
Department of History, The University of Chicago, 1126 E. 59th St, Chicago IL 60637, USA E-mail: patrick.kelly.w@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 1973 Chilean coup gave rise to an unprecedented growth in a global human rights consciousness. In its aftermath, transnational activists from a diverse array of political and ideological backgrounds found common cause – indeed, a common language of human rights – in campaigns to ameliorate the repressive acts of the Chilean military junta. This article focuses on two models of activism in particular: Amnesty International, whose 1973 investigative mission set the terms of the global debate about human rights in Chile; and transnational solidarity activists, especially Chilean exiles from leftist parties, whose vision of social activism narrowed as their interest in human rights surged. These campaigns – while not without tensions over the role of politics in the moral appeal to human rights – both articulated a transnational discourse of human rights and created new activist techniques to foment moral outrage by revealing the prevalence of torture through the power of personal testimony.

Keywords

1973 Chilean coupglobal civil societyhuman rights activismsolidaritytransnational
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Global History , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 165 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

For his unwavering support of this article and all else, I am indebted to Mark Philip Bradley. The article also draws on wise advice from Michael Geyer, Mauricio Tenorio, Sam Moyn, Jan Eckel, Jim Green, Diana Schwartz, Elizabeth Dale and her legal history webinar, and the Latin American History Workshop at Chicago. For sharing their time and stories, I would like to thank José (Pepe) Zalaquett, Roger Plant, Tracy Ulltveit-Moe, and Tom Quigley. The research for this article was funded by the Social Science Research Council–ACLS International Dissertation Research Fellowship.

References

1 Wisconsin Historical Society, Madison, WI, Community Action on Latin America Records, box 1, folder 3, Margaret Andersen to Community Action on Latin America, undated.

2 Wipfler, William L., ‘Solidaridad en Chile: una entrevista a José Zalaquett’, Christianity and Crisis, 21 June 1976, p. 7Google Scholar

3 Zalaquett, José, ‘Human rights: suggestions about priorities for investigation and reflection’; the memo reads like an early draft of Zalaquett's The Human Rights Movement, Geneva: World Council of Churches, 1981Google Scholar

4 Interview with José Zalaquett, 5 December 2011, Santiago de Chile.

5 Wipfler, ‘Solidaridad’, p. 7Google Scholar

6 Krasner, Stephen, Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999, pp. 3–4Google Scholar

7 Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘Human rights, principled issue-networks, and sovereignty in Latin America’, International Organization, 47, 3, 1993, p. 411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grandin, Greg, ‘The liberal tradition in the Americas: rights, sovereignty, and the origins of liberal multilateralism’, American Historical Review, 117, 1, 2012, p. 70Google Scholar

8 Tom Quigley, correspondence with author, 26 May 2010.

9 Eckel, Jan, ‘ “Under a magnifying glass”: the international human rights campaign against Chile in the seventies’, in Stefan-Ludwig Hoffmann, ed., Human rights in the twentieth century, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 321–341Google Scholar

Neier, Aryeh, The international human rights movement: a history, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Gosse, ‘Unpacking the Vietnam syndrome: the 1973 coup in Chile and the rise of anti-interventionist politics’, in Van Gosse and Richard Moser, eds., The world the sixties made: politics and culture in recent America, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2003, pp. 100–113Google Scholar

Power, Margaret, ‘The U.S. movement in solidarity with Chile in the 1970s’, Latin American Perspectives, 36, 6, 2009, pp. 46–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Tom Buchanan: ‘Amnesty International in crisis, 1966–7’, Twentieth Century British History, 15, 3, 2004, pp. 267–289Google Scholar

Hopgood, Stephen, Keepers of the flame: understanding Amnesty International, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel, The last utopia: human rights in history, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010Google Scholar

Clark, Ann Marie, Diplomacy of conscience: Amnesty International and changing human rights norms, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001Google Scholar

11 These topics are, however, taken up in my forthcoming dissertation, ‘Rights after revolution: transnational human rights activism in the Americas in the long 1970s’, PhD thesis, University of Chicago.

12 Moyn, Last utopia, p. 8Google Scholar

Kelly, Patrick William, ‘ “Zauberworte”: die Entstehung eines transnationalen Menschenrechtsaktivismus im Cono Sur während der langen 1970er Jahre’, in Jan Eckel and Samuel Moyn, eds., Moral für die Welt? Menschenrechtspolitik in den 1970er Jahren, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2012, pp. 205–229Google Scholar

13 Westad, Odd Arne, The global Cold War: Third World interventions and the making of our times, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwon, Heonik, The other Cold War, New York: Columbia University Press, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Connelly, Matthew, ‘Taking off the Cold War lens: visions of North–South conflict during the Algerian War for Independence’, American Historical Review, 105, 3, 2000, pp. 739–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Cmiel, Kenneth, ‘The emergence of human rights politics in the United States’, Journal of American History, 86, 3, 1999, pp. 1231–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Gosse, ‘A movement of movements: the definition and periodization of the New Left’, in Jean-Christophe Agnew and Roy Rosenzwig, eds., A companion to post-1945 America, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2002, pp. 277–302Google Scholar

Hall, Jacquelyn Dowd, ‘The long civil rights movement and the political uses of the past’, Journal of American History, 91, 4, 2005, pp. 1233–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Grandin, ‘Liberal tradition’; Steve J. Stern, Battling for hearts and minds: memory struggles in Pinochet's Chile, 1973–1988, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006Google Scholar

Engler, Mark, ‘Toward the “rights of the poor”: human rights in liberation theology’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 28, 3, pp. 339–365Google Scholar

17 Thomas, Daniel C., The Helsinki effect: international norms, human rights, and the demise of Communism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001, pp. 50–51Google Scholar

18 Hite, Katherine, When the romance ended: leaders of the Chilean left, 1968–1998, New York: Columbia University Press, 2000, pp. 139–140Google Scholar

19 New York Times, 12 September 1973.

20 New York Times, 20 September 1973.

21 Wionczek, Miguel S., ‘En Chile no ha pasado gran cosa …’, El Excélsior, 21 September 1973Google Scholar

22 FSA, ASI, 9, 2, opening statement of Kalevi Sorsa, undated.

23 ‘Repression, resistance, and censorship’, Chile Newsletter, 1, 1, 1 November 1973, p. 4, from North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA) Archive, microfilm roll no. 24, frame no. 0508, file no. 125; Power, ‘U.S. Movement’.

24 Inaipil, Fernando Montupil and Barudy, Jorge, eds., Exilio, derechos humanos y democracia: el exilio chileno en Europa, Santiago: Casa de América Latina, 1993, p. 20Google Scholar

25 Gutiérrez, Pamela, ‘El héroe olvidado’, La Nación, 12 September 2009Google Scholar

Padilla, Fernando Camacho, ‘La diaspora chilena y su confrontación con la Embajada de Chile en Suecia’, in José del Pozo, ed., Exiliados, emigrados y retornados: chilenos en América y Europa, 1973–2004, Santiago de Chile: RIL Editores, 2006, p. 38Google Scholar

26 Eckel, Jan, ‘Under a magnifying glass’, p. 326Google Scholar

27 Archivo de la Palabra of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Memoria e identidad, Política y cultura del exilio latinoamericano em México series (henceforth AP), PEL/1/CH/15, interview with Rogelio de la Fuente, conducted by Renée Salas in Mexico City, 1 October 1997.

28 Harmer, Tanya, Allende's Chile and the Inter-American war, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2011Google Scholar

29 Westad, Global Cold War.

30 Suri, Jeremi, Power and protest: global revolution and the rise of détente, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003, pp. 88–130Google Scholar

31 Kornbluh, Peter, The Pinochet file, New York: The New Press, 2004Google Scholar

Dinges, John, The condor years, New York: The New Press, 2004Google Scholar

32 Dykmann, Klaas, The human rights policy of the Organization of American States in Latin America, Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener, 2008Google Scholar

Quiroga, Cecilia Medina, The battle of human rights: gross systematic violations and the Inter-American system, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1988Google Scholar

33 Interview with Roger Plant, 29 June 2012, London.

34 Amnesty International of the USA Records, Center for Human Rights Documentation and Research, Columbia University, New York (henceforth AI-USA), series II.5, box 3, AMR-22, Executive Director Files, Americas–Chile, ‘Telegrammes sent 14 September 1973’. For decisions about Chile, see the minutes of the meetings of the International Executive Committee in Amnesty International's International Secretariat Archives, International Institute for Social History, Amsterdam (henceforth AI-IISH), 414–15.

35 For the press release, see AI-USA, series II.5, box 3, AMR-22; see more generally the resolution passed at the 6th International Council Meeting, held just days after the coup, 13–16 September 1973, in AI-USA, series I.3, box 1.

36 For a summary of Amnesty's activities, see AI-USA, series II.5, box 3, AMR-22, International Secretariat (henceforth IS) to all National Sections, ‘Urgent Action Campaign: Chile’, 12 October 1973.

37 Interview with José Zalaquett.

38 California State Archives, State Government Oral History Program, Frank C. Newman, oral history interview, conducted in 1989 and 1991 by Carole Hicke, Regional Oral History Office, University of California at Berkeley.

39 Interview with Roger Plant.

40 Newman, oral history interview, p. 287.

41 Interview with Roger Plant; Newman, oral history interview, p. 291.

42 Newman, oral history interview, p. 299.

43 Interview with Roger Plant.

44 AI-USA, series II.5, box 3, AMR-22, ‘Report of the mission to Santiago, Chile, 1–8th November 1973’ (henceforth Amnesty Report on Chile).

45 On Amnesty's evolving mandate, see Amnesty International: a chronology, 1961–1976, London: Amnesty International, 1976; see also Amnesty International, Report on torture, London: Gerald Duckworth, 1973.

46 Kelly, Tobias, This side of silence: torture, human rights, and the recognition of cruelty, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, Tobias, ‘What we talk about when we talk about torture’, Humanity 2, 2, 2011, pp. 327–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47 AI-USA, series II.5, box 3, AMR-22, Campaign for the Abolition of Torture Department to all National Sections, ‘Re: Torture in Chile’.

48 Hearings before the Subcommittees on Inter-American Affairs and on International Organizations and Movements of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-third Congress, Second Session, ‘Human rights in Chile’, 7 December 1973, p. 27.

49 Amnesty Report on Chile, Annex I: ‘Letter written by Professor Frank C. Newman to the Colegio de Abogados’, 16 November 1973.

50 See Amnesty Report on Chile.

51 Newman, oral history interview, p. 288.

52 Interview with Roger Plant; interview with Tracy Ulltveit-Moe, 29 June 2012, London.

53 AI-USA, series II.5, box 3, AMR-22, AI Research Department, ‘List of recommendations coming from meeting of National Sections – 2/3 February 1974, re: Chile’, February 1974.

54 AI-USA, series II.5, box 3, AMR-22, AI Research Department to all National Sections, ‘Second anniversary of the coup in Chile’, 5 August 1975.

55 AP, PEL/4/CH/4, interview with Gabriel Gaspar, conducted by Gabriela Díaz in Santiago de Chile, 13 August 1999.

56 Archivo General de la Nación, Mexico City, Mexico, Galeria 2, SCDFS/Investigaciones Políticas y Sociales (IPS) (henceforth AGN), 1808 C, exp. 7, ‘Boletín del Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionaria de Chile en el exterior’, Correo de la Resistencia, 2, August 1974.

57 Green, James, ‘We cannot remain silent’: opposition to the Brazilian military dictatorship in the United States, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58 Eastmond, Marita, The dilemmas of exile: Chilean refugees in the USA, Gothenburg: Department of Social Anthropology, Gothenburg University, 1997Google Scholar

Wright, Thomas and Oñate, Rody, Flight from Chile: voices of exile, Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1998Google Scholar

Sznajder, Mario and Roniger, Luis, The politics of exile in Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roniger, Luis and Green, James N., ‘Introduction: exiles and the politics of exclusion in Latin America,’ Latin American Perspectives, 155, 34, 4, 2007, pp. 3–6Google Scholar

59 Museo de la Memoria y los Derechos Humanos, Biblioteca Digital, Santiago de Chile, ‘One minute of darkness does not blind us’, poster from German film Eine Minute Dunkel macht uns nicht blind (1975), produced by the West German documentary film directors Gerard Scheumann and Walter Heynowski.

60 FSA, ASI, 9, 1, Comisión Investigadora de los Crímenes de la Junta Militar en Chile, Primera Sesión, Helsinki, 1974; The complete list of countries that attended the first session is: Belgium, Finland, France, Denmark, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Vietnam, Panama, Ecuador, the United States, Brazil, the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, Chile, Argentina, Great Britain, Bolivia, Uruguay, Canada, Sweden, Austria, the German Democratic Republic, Japan, Cuba, Venezuela, the Federal Republic of Germany, India, Norway, Poland, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, Algeria, and Australia.

61 Camacho, ‘Diaspora’.

62 The Commission continued to meet throughout the early 1980s, but it never held another full session. Smaller audiences were held in Denmark (1979), Rome (1980), Athens (1982), and Helsinki (1983). See FSA, ASI, 20, 1.

63 Jacob Söderman, correspondence with author, 31 January 2010.

64 FSA, ASI, 9, 4, Statutes of the International Commission of Enquiry into the Crimes of the Military Junta in Chile, undated.

65 Stern, Battling, pp. 90–97Google Scholar

66 FSA, ASI, 9, 1, testimony of Alicia Flores Flores, undated.

67 FSA, ASI, 9, 1, untitled and undated memo.

68 These events are discussed in more detail in my PhD dissertation. See also FSA, ASI, 22.

69 Jacob Söderman, correspondence with author, 31 January 2010.

70 FSA, ASI, 9, 1, testimony of Alberto Míguez, undated.

71 FSA, ASI, 9, 1, testimony of Marta Olivares Gómez, undated.

72 FSA, ASI, 9, 6, ‘Meeting of the Secretariat, Helsinki Finland’, 4 August 1974.

73 FSA, ASI, 13, 2, ‘To save the lives of people kidnapped by DINA’, undated.

74 See AP, PEL/1/CH/1, testimony of Jorge Witker.

75 VS, 36: Chile-América no. 5, ‘La Junta Militar antes el juicio internacional: el fracaso de Ginebra’, 1975.

76 Suárez, Luis, Echeverría rompe el silencio, Mexico City: Grijalbo, 1979Google Scholar

77 AGN, 1808 C, Exp. 7, IPS report, ‘Sesión de Trabajo de la Comisión Investigadora de los Crímenes de la Junta Militar en Chile’, 19 February 1975; VS, ‘La Junta Militar’.

78 AGN, 1808 C, Exp. 7, speech by Harald Edelstam before the International Commission, ‘Sesión de Trabajo’, 19 February 1975.

79 AGN, 1808 C, Exp. 7, statement of Alicia Zama, IPS report, ‘Continuaron las sesiones del trabajo de la tercera reunión de la Comisión Internacional Investigadora de los Crímenes en Chile’, 19 February 1975.

80 AGN, 1808 C, Exp. 7, testimonies of Amy Conger and General Sergio Poblete, IPS report, ‘Continuaron las sesiones’, 19 February 1975.

81 AGN, 1808 C, Exp. 8, statement of Antonio Leal, IPS report, ‘Sesión de Trabajo de la Comisión Investigadora de los Crímenes de la Junta Militar en Chile’, 20 February 1975.

82 Jacob Söderman, correspondence with author, 31 January 2009.

83 Yankelevich, Pablo, México: país refugio, Mexico City: Plaza y Verdes, 2002Google Scholar

Yankelevich, Pablo, Ráfagas de un exilio: Argentinos en México, 1974–1983, Mexico City: El Colegio de México, 2010Google Scholar

Meyer, Eugenia and Salgado, Eva, Refugio de la memoria: la experiencia de los exilios latinoamericanos en México, Mexico City: UNAM, 2002Google Scholar

Iber, Patrick, ‘The imperialism of liberty: intellectuals and the politics of culture in Cold War Latin America’, PhD thesis, University of Chicago, 2010Google Scholar

84 Jocelyn Olcott explains similar trends in her article on the 1975 UN Conference in Mexico City, ‘Cold War conflicts and cheap cabaret: sexual politics at the 1975 United Nations International Women's Year Conference’, Gender & History, 22, 3, 2010, pp. 733–54.

85 AP, PEL/1/CH/15, interview with Rogelio de la Fuente. Similar statements abounded in the interviews collected in the AP.

86 AP, PEL/4/CH/4, interview with Gabriel Gaspar; see also AP, PEL/1/CH/34, interview with Hugo de la Fuente conducted by Renée Salas in Mexico City, 2 March 1998.

87 AP, PEL/1/B/4, interview with Severo Salles, conducted by Concepción Hernández in Mexico City, 24 September and 4 October 1999.

88 ‘Tributo de los Asilados Chilenos’, El Día, 25 September 1974.

89 AI-USA, series II.5, box 3, AMR-22, IS memo, ‘Subject: refugees in Chile’, November 1973.

90 ‘La Casa de Chile difundirá la historia reciente de aqual país’, El Día, 12 September 1974; ‘La Sra. Echeverría inauguró la Casa de Chile en México’, El Excélsior, 12 September 1974.

91 ‘La Sra. Echeverría’.

92 AP, PEL/1/CH/15, interview with Rogelio de la Fuente.

93 AP, PEL/1/CH/12, interview with Jorge Witker. The Casa de Chile was primarily seen in a political light. In early 1975, Mexican newspapers carried stories of a dynamite bomb that failed to detonate at the Casa. Many linked the potential attack to officials from the Chilean Junta: see ‘Atribuyen a la Junta Militar el atentado contra la Casa de Chile’, El Día, 24 January 1975; interview with Beatriz Torres, 29 September 2011.

94 AGN, 1808 C, Exp. 6, ‘Hace un año que en Chile retroceden los relojes’, El Nacional.

95 ‘Repudio en Europa y América a la Junta Chilena’, El Excélsior, 12 September 1974.

96 AGN, 1808 C, Exp. 6, ‘Gran mitin de masas arena México – con la resistencia chilena, por el socialismo!’

97 AGN, 1808 D, Exp. 9, ‘Plan de Acción’ of the Mitin Internacional de Solidaridad con Chile, undated.

98 AGN, 1808 C, Exp. 6, ‘Llamada de Chile a las Juventudes del Mundo’ – Gaceta Estudiantil, 5 September 1974.

99 Oscar del Rivero, ‘Gobierno en el Exilio, no; Lucha Hasta Lograr la Victoria Democrática, sí’, Universal Gráfico, 19 February 1975Google Scholar

Vallejos, Rolando Alvarez, Desde las sombras: una historia de la clandestinidad comunista (1973–1980), Santiago: LOM, 2003Google Scholar

100 ‘México rompió con la Junta Fascista Chilena’, El Día, 27 November 1974; ‘México rompió relaciones con Chile’, Heraldo de México, 27 November 1974; ‘Rompió México relaciones con Chile’, La Prensa, 27 November 1974; ‘México rompió relaciones con el gobierno de Pinochet’, El Excélsior, 27 November 1974.

101 ‘$$$\vskip-7pt\rotate180{!!!}$$$Solidaridad con el pueblo Chileno!!!’ El Excélsior, 28 November 1974. This same confusion can be seen in documents from Brazilian leftists in the same period.

102 ‘La ruptura con Chile: una victoria moral’, La Prensa, 29 November 1974.

103 Maier, Charles, ‘Consigning the twentieth century to history’, American Historical Review, 105, 3, 2000, pp. 807–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar

104 Sikkink, Kathryn, The justice cascade, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2010Google Scholar

Simmons, Beth, Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greg Grandin, ‘The instruction of great catastrophe: truth commissions, national history, and state formation in Argentina, Chile, and Guatemala’, American Historical Review, 110, 1, 2005Google Scholar

105 Hite, When the romance ended.