Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T15:04:35.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The stability of filamentary vorticity in two-dimensional geophysical vortex-dynamics models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

D. W. Waugh
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics. University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
D. G. Dritschel
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics. University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK

Abstract

The linear stability of filaments or strips of ‘potential’ vorticity in a background shear flow is investigated for a class of two-dimensional, inviscid, non-divergent models having a linear inversion relation between stream function and potential vorticity. In general, the potential vorticity is not simply the Laplacian of the stream function – the case which has received the greatest attention historically. More general inversion relationships between stream function and potential vorticity are geophysically motivated and give an impression of how certain classic results, such as the stability of strips of vorticity, hold under more general circumstances.

In all models, a strip of potential vorticity is unstable in the absence of a background shear flow. Imposing a shear flow that reverses the total shear across the strip, however, brings about stability, independent of the Green-function inversion operator that links the stream function to the potential vorticity. But, if the Green-function inversion operator has a sufficiently short interaction range, the strip can also be stabilized by shear having the same sense as the shear of the strip. Such stabilization by ‘co-operative’ shear does not occur when the inversion operator is the inverse Laplacian. Nonlinear calculations presented show that there is only slight disruption to the strip for substantially less adverse shear than necessary for linear stability, while for co-operative shear, there is major disruption to the strip. It is significant that the potential vorticity of the imposed flow necessary to create shear of a given value increases dramatically as the interaction range of the inversion operator decreases, making shear stabilization increasingly less likely. This implies an increased propensity for filaments to ‘roll-up’ into small vortices as the interaction range decreases, a finding consistent with many numerical calculations performed using the quasi-geostrophic model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1991 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnol'd, V. I. 1965 Conditions for non-linear stability of stationary plane curvilinear flows of an ideal fluid. Dokl. Akad. SSSR 162, 975978. (Transl. in Sov. Maths. 6 (1965), 773–777.)Google Scholar
Arnol'd, V. I. 1966 On an a priori estimate on the theory of hydrodynamic stability. Izv. Vyssh. Uchcbn. Zaved. Matematika 54, 35. (Transl. in Am. Math. Trans. Series. 2 79 (1969), 267–269.)Google Scholar
Benzi, R., Patarnello, S. & Santangelo, P. 1987 On the statistical properties of two-dimensional turbulence. Europhys. Lett. 3, 811818.Google Scholar
Benzi, R., Pierini, S, Vulpiani, A. & Salusti, E. 1982 On the hydrodynamic stability of planetary vortices. Geophy.s. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 20, 293306.Google Scholar
Couder, Y. & Basdevant, C. 1986 Experimental and numerical study of vortex couples in two-dimensional flows. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 225251.Google Scholar
Dhanak, M. R, 1981 The stability of an expanding circular vortex layer, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 375, 443451.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1986 The nonlinear evolution of rotating configurations of uniform vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 172, 157182.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1988 The repeated filamentation of two-dimensional vorticity interfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 194, 511547.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1989a Contour dynamics and contour surgery: Numerical algorithms for extended, high-resolution modelling of vortex dynamics in two-dimensional, inviscid, incompressible flows. Comput. Phys. Rep. 10, 77146.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1989b On the stabilization of a two-dimensional vortex strip by adverse shear. J. Fluid Mech. 206, 193221 (referred to herein as D).Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G., Haynes, P. H., Juckes, M. N. & Shepherd, T. G. 1991 The stability of a two-dimensional vorticity filament under uniform strain. J'. Fluid Mech. 230, 647665.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. & Polvani, L. M. 1991 The roll-up of vorticity strips on the sphere. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted).Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. W. & Hopfinger, E. J. 1987 Coalescing of geostrophic vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 178, 7397.Google Scholar
Hedstrom, K. & Armi, L. 1988 An experimental study of homogeneous lenses in a stratified rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 191, 535556.Google Scholar
Hoskins, B. J., McIntyre, M. E. & Robertson, A. W. 1985 On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 111, 877946. (Also 113. 402–404.)Google Scholar
Juckes, M. N. & McIntyrc, M. E. 1987 A high-resolution one-layer model of breaking planetary waves in the stratosphere. Nature 328, 590596.Google Scholar
Kurganskiy, M. V. & Tatarskaya, M. S. 1987 The potential vorticity concept in meteorology: a review. Izv. Akad. Nauk SS8R FAO). Also Corrigendum in 25, 1346. (Transl. in Atmos. Ocean Phys. 23, 587606.)Google Scholar
Legras; B., Santangelo, P. & Benzi, R. 1988 High resolution numerical experiments for two-dimensional turbulence. Europhys. Lett. 5, 3742.Google Scholar
McIntyre, M. E. & Norton, W. A. 1991 Potential-vorticity inversion on a hemisphere. J. Atmos. Sci, (to appear).Google Scholar
McIntyre, M. E. & Shepherd, T. G. 1987 An exact local conservation theorem for finite-amplitude disturbances to non-parallel shear flows, with remarks on Hamiltonian structure and Arnol'd's stability theorems. J. Fluid Aleck. 181, 527565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melander, M. V., McWelliams, J. C. & Zabusky, X. J. 1987 Axisymmetrization and vorticity gradient intensification of an isolated two-dimensional vortex through filamentation., J. Fluid Mech. 178, 137159.Google Scholar
Melander, M. V., Zabusky, X. J. & McWilliams, J. C. 1988 Symmetric vortex merger in two dimensions: causes and conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 303340.Google Scholar
Phillips, N. A. 1954 Energy transformations and meridional circulations associated with simple baroclinic waves in a two-level, quasigeostrophic model. Tellus 6, 273286.Google Scholar
Polvani, L. M., Zabusky, X. J. & Flierl, G. R. 1989 Two-layer geostrophic vortex dynamics. Part 1. Upper layer V-states and merger. J. Fluid Mech. 205, 215242Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1894 The Theory of Sound, 2nd edn. Macmillan (also 3rd edn. 1945 Dover).
Waugh, D. W. 1991 The efficiency of symmetric vortex merger. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted).Google Scholar
Zakharov, S. B, 1977 The stability of plane vortex sheets in an ideal fluid. Fluid Mech. Sov. Res. 1, 17. (Engl. transl. of Uchenyye zapiski TsAGI VII 3 (1976), 26–31.)Google Scholar