Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:51:26.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal and Size Anomalies in the Japanese Stock Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Kiyoshi Kato  and
James S. Schallheim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Little attention has been paid by the academic community in the United States to the Japanese stock market and its structure. Japan has the second largest economy in the Western world, and the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) is second only to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in terms of aggregate market values and sales volume. Analysis of the Japanese stock market is useful given its relative importance, but, in addition, examination of the Japanese market may offer insights into controversies surrounding U.S. markets. This study focuses on two such current controversies: the January and size anomalies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 243 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Banz, R. W. “The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 9 (03 1981), pp. 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Barry, C. B., and Brown, S. J.. “Differential Information and the Small Firm Effect.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13 (06 1984), pp. 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Berges, A.; McConnell, J. J.; and Schlarbaum, G. G.. “An Investigation of the Turn-of-the-Year Effect, the Small Firm Effect and the Tax-Loss-Selling Pressure Hypothesis in Canadian Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 39 (03 1984), pp. 185–192.Google Scholar
[4]Brown, P.; Kleidon, A. W.; and Marsh, T. A.. “New Evidence on the Nature of Size-Related Anomalies in Stock Prices.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 12 (06 1983), pp. 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Brown, P.; Keim, D. B.; Kleidon, A. W.; and Marsh, T. A.. “Stock Return Seasonalities and the Tax-Loss-Selling Hypothesis: Analysis of the Arguments and Australian Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 12 (06 1983), pp. 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Chen, N. “Some Empirical Tests of the Theory of Arbitrage Pricing.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 38 (12 1983), pp. 1393–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Constantinides, G. M. “Optimal Stock Trading with Personal Taxes: Implications for Prices and the Abnormal January Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13 (03 1984), pp. 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Givoly, D., and Ovadia, A., “Year-End Tax-Induced Sales and Stock Market Seasonally.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 38 (03 1983), pp. 171–185.Google Scholar
[9]Gultekin, M. N., and Gultekin, N. B.. “Stock Market Seasonality: International Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 12 (12 1983), pp. 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kalay, A., and Lowenstein, U.. “Predictable Events and Excess Returns: The Case of Dividend Announcements.” Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
[11]Keim, D. B. “Size-Related Anomalies and Stock Return Seasonality: Further Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 12 (06 1983), pp. 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Kunimura, M. “The Information Content of Forecast by Corporate Officials and by Financial Analysts in the Japanese Capital Market.” Working Paper, No. 84–3, University of Pennsylvania (undated).Google Scholar
[13]Reinganum, M. R. “Misspecification of Capital Asset Pricing: Empirical Anomalies Based on Earnings Yields and Market Values.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 9 (03 1981), pp. 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Reinganum, M. R.. “Empirical Test of Multi-Factor Pricing Model, the Arbitrage Pricing Theory: Some Empirical Results.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 36 (05 1981), pp. 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Reinganum, M. R.. “A Direct Test of Roll's Conjecture on the Firm Size Effect.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 37 (03 1982), pp. 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Reinganum, M. R.. “The Anomalous Stock Market Behavior of Small Firms in January: Empirical Tests for Year-End Tax Effect.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 12 (06 1983), pp. 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Roll, R. “A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory's Tests,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 4 (05 1977), pp. 129–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Roll, R.. “A Possible Explanation of the Small Firm Effect.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 36 (09 1981), pp. 879–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Roll, R.. “Vas ist Das? The Turn-of-the-Year Effect and the Return Premia of Small Firms.” Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 9 (Winter 1983), pp. 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Schultz, P. “Transaction Costs and the Small Firm Effect: A Comment.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 12 (06 1983), pp. 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Stoll, H. R., and Whaley, R. E.. “Transaction Costs and the Small Firm Effect.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 12 (06 1983), pp. 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Wachtel, S. B. “Certain Observation on Seasonal Movement in Stock Prices.” Journal of Business, Vol. 15 (1942), pp. 184–193.Google Scholar