Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:09:09.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Test of the Three-Moment Capital Asset Pricing Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Kian-Guan Lim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper tests the Kraus-Litzenberger (1976) three-moment capital asset pricing model using Hansen's (1982) generalized method-of-moments (GMM). The GMM approach does not impose strong distributional assumptions on the asset returns. This is an interesting issue since there is no obvious multivariate distribution for returns that also exhibits co-skewness. Using monthly stock returns to test the model, there is some evidence that systematic skewness is priced.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 205 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barone-Adesi, G. “Arbitrage Equilibrium with Skewed Asset Returns.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 (09 1985), 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. P., and Gibbons, M. R.. “A Simple Econometric Approach for Utility-Based Asset Pricing Models.” Journal of Finance, 48 (06 1985), 359–381.Google Scholar
Cass, D., and Stiglitz, J.. “The Structure of Investor Preferences and Asset Returns, and Separability in Portfolio Allocation: A Contribution to the Pure Theory of Mutual Funds.” Journal of Economic Theory, 2 (06 1970), 122–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F. “Multiperiod Consumption-Investment Decisions.” American Economic Review, 60 (03 1970), 163–174.Google Scholar
Friend, I., and Westerfield, R.. “Co-Skewness and Capital Asset Pricing.” Journal of Finance, 35 (09 1980), 897–914.Google Scholar
Fuller, W. A.Introduction to Statistical Time Series. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1976).Google Scholar
Gibbons, M. R. “Multivariate Tests of Financial Models: A New Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics, 10 (03 1982), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L. P. “Large Sample Properties of Generalised Method of Moments Estimators.” Econometrica, 50 (07 1982), 1029–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L. P., and Singleton, K. J.. “Generalised Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models.” Econometrica, 50 (09 1982), 1269–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibbotson, R., and Sinquefield, R.. Stocks, Bonds, Bills and Inflation: The Past and The Future. Monograph 15, Financial Analysts Research Foundation (1982).Google Scholar
Kraus, A., and Litzenberger, R. H.. “Skewness Preference and the Valuation of Risk Assets.” Journal of Finance, 31 (09 1976), 1085–1100.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, M. “An Aggregation Theorem for Securities Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 1 (09 1974), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, R. S., and Wei, K. C. J.. “Asset Pricing, Higher Moments, and the Market Risk Premium: A Note.” Journal of Finance, 40 (09 1985), 1251–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, R. S., and Wei, K. C. J.. “The Structure of Skewness Preferences in Asset Pricing Models with Higher Moments: An Empirical Test.” The Financial Review, 23 (02 1988), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serfling, R.Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar