Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation and Best Clienteles

  • Stéphane Chrétien and Manel Kammoun

Abstract

This paper investigates investor disagreement and clientele effects in performance evaluation by developing a measure that considers the best potential clienteles of mutual funds. In an incomplete market under law-of-one-price (LOP) and no-good-deal conditions, we obtain an upper bound on admissible performance measures that identifies the most favorable alpha. Empirically, we find that a reasonable investor disagreement leads to generally positive performance for the best clienteles. Performance disagreement by investors can be significant enough to change the average evaluation of mutual funds from negative to positive, depending on the clienteles.

Copyright

Corresponding author

* Chrétien (corresponding author), stephane.chretien@fsa.ulaval.ca, Faculty of Business Administration, Laval University; Kammoun, manel.kammoun@uqo.ca, Department of Administrative Sciences, Université du Québec en Outaouais.

Footnotes

Hide All
1

We thank Vikas Agarwal, Laurent Barras, Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Stephen Brown (the editor), Frank Coggins, Wayne Ferson, Juha Joenväärä, Laurenz Klipper, Jerchern Lin (the referee), Gabriel Power, and participants at the 2014 Mathematical Finance Days, the 2014 European Financial Management Association Annual Conference, the 2014 World Finance Conference, the 2014 Financial Management Association Annual Meeting, and seminars at Laval University, Ryerson University, University of Quebec at Montreal, and Université du Québec en Outaouais for helpful comments. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Faculty of Business Administration and Investors Group Chair in Financial Planning at Laval University and the Institut de Finance Mathématique de Montréal.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Ahn, D.; Cao, H. H.; and Chrétien, S.. “Portfolio Performance Measurement: A No Arbitrage Bounds Approach.” European Financial Management, 15 (2009), 298339.
Bailey, W.; Kumar, A.; and Ng, D.. “Behavioral Biases and Mutual Fund Investors.” Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (2011), 127.
Barras, L.; Scaillet, O.; and Wermers, R.. “False Discoveries in Mutual Fund Performance: Measuring Luck in Estimated Alphas.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 179216.
Bernardo, A. E., and Ledoit, O.. “Gain, Loss, and Asset Pricing.” Journal of Political Economy, 108 (2000), 144172.
Carhart, M. M.On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 5782.
Chen, Z., and Knez, P. J.. “Portfolio Performance Measurement: Theory and Applications.” Review of Financial Studies, 9 (1996), 511555.
Chrétien, S.Bounds on the Autocorrelation of Admissible Stochastic Discount Factors.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 36 (2012), 19431962.
Christoffersen, P.Evaluating Interval Forecasts.” International Economic Review, 39 (1998), 841862.
Christopherson, J. A.; Ferson, W. E.; and Glassman, D. A.. “Conditioning Manager Alpha on Economic Information: Another Look at the Persistence of Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 11 (1998), 111142.
Cochrane, J., and Saá-Requejo, J.. “Beyond Arbitrage: Good-Deal Asset Price Bounds in Incomplete Markets.” Journal of Political Economy, 108 (2000), 79119.
Cremers, M.; Petajisto, A.; and Zitzewitz, E.. “Should Benchmark Indices Have Alpha? Revisiting Performance Evaluation.” Critical Finance Review, 2 (2013), 148.
Dahlquist, M., and Söderlind, P.. “Evaluating Portfolio Performance with Stochastic Discount Factors.” Journal of Business, 72 (1999), 347383.
Del Guercio, D., and Reuter, J.. “Mutual Fund Performance and the Incentive to Generate Alpha.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 16731704.
Elton, E. J.; Gruber, M. J.; and Blake, C. R.. “A First Look at the Accuracy of the CRSP Mutual Fund Database and a Comparison of the CRSP and Morningstar Mutual Fund Databases.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 24152430.
Evans, R. B.Mutual Fund Incubation.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 15811611.
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 356.
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Luck versus Skill in the Cross-Section of Mutual Fund Returns.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 19151948.
Farnsworth, H.; Ferson, W. E.; Jackson, D.; and Todd, S.. “Performance Evaluation with Stochastic Discount Factors.” Journal of Business, 75 (2002), 473503.
Ferson, W. E.Investment Performance Evaluation.” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2 (2010), 207234.
Ferson, W. E., and Chen, Y.. “How Many Good and Bad Fund Managers Are There, Really?” Working Paper, University of Southern California (2015).
Ferson, W. E., and Lin, J.. “Alpha and Performance Measurement: The Effect of Investor Disagreement and Heterogeneity.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 15651596.
Ferson, W. E., and Schadt, R.. “Measuring Fund Strategy and Performance in Changing Economic Conditions.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 425462.
Floroiu, O., and Pelsser, A.. “Closed-Form Solutions for Options in Incomplete Markets.” Working Paper, Maastricht University (2013).
Glode, V.Why Mutual Funds Underperform.” Journal of Financial Economics, 93 (2011), 546559.
Glosten, L., and Jagannathan, R.. “A Contingent Claims Approach to Performance Evaluation.” Journal of Empirical Finance, 1 (1994), 133166.
Gruber, M. J.Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 783810.
Hansen, L. P.Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators.” Econometrica, 50 (1982), 10291054.
Hansen, L. P., and Jagannathan, R.. “Implication of Security Market Data for Models of Dynamic Economies.” Journal of Political Economy, 99 (1991), 225262.
Huang, D., and Zhou, G.. “Upper Bounds on Return Predictability.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52 (2017), 401425.
Kacperczyk, M.; Sialm, C.; and Zheng, L.. “Unobserved Actions of Mutual Funds.” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2008), 23792416.
Kacperczyk, M.; Van Niwuwerburgh, S.; and Veldkamp, L.. “Time-Varying Fund Manager Skill.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 14551484.
Kanamura, T., and Ohashi, K.. “Pricing Summer Day Options by Good-Deal Bounds.” Energy Economics, 31 (2009), 289297.
Koski, J. L., and Pontiff, J.. “How Are Derivatives Used? Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 791816.
Kosowski, R.Do Mutual Funds Perform When It Matters Most to Investors? U.S. Mutual Fund Performance and Risk in Recessions and Expansions.” Quarterly Journal of Finance, 1 (2011), 607664.
Lo, A., and MacKinlay, A. C.. “An Econometric Analysis of Nonsynchronous Trading.” Journal of Econometrics, 45 (1990), 181212.
MacKinlay, A. C.Multifactor Models Do Not Explain Deviations from the CAPM.” Journal of Financial Economics, 38 (1995), 328.
Martin, I. W. R.Consumption-Based Asset Pricing with Higher Cumulants.” Review of Economics Studies, 80 (2013), 745773.
Moskowitz, T.Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock-Picking Talent, Style, Transaction Costs, and Expenses: Discussion.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 16951703.
Newey, W. K., and West, K. D.. “A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix.” Econometrica, 55 (1987), 703708.
Pyo, U.Minimax Price Bounds in Incomplete Markets.” Journal of Economics and Finance, 35 (2011), 274295.
Ross, S. A.The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing.” Journal of Economics Theory, 13 (1976), 341360.
Ross, S. A. Neoclassical Finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (2005).
Sharpe, W. F.Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Business, 1 (1966), 119138.
Snow, K. N.Diagnosing Asset Pricing Models using the Distribution of Asset Returns.” Journal of Finance, 46 (1991), 955983.
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Chrétien and Kammoun supplementary material
Chrétien and Kammoun supplementary material 1

 Unknown (417 KB)
417 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed