Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T06:35:06.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alternative Multivariate Tests in Limited Dependent Variable Models: An Empirical Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

Recently, a debate has developed in both the theoretical and applied statistical literature regarding the appropriateness of various techniques in analytical models with limited (particularly, 0-1) dependent variables. In financial research, limited dependent variable models usually arise in one of two ways:

1. classification (or discrimination)--assigning observations to discrete, a priori determined groups, or

2. regression--relating a qualitative dependent variable to one or more independent variables (which may or may not be qualitative).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Agelasto, M., and Listokin, D.. The Urban Financial Dilemma: Deinvestrnent and Redlining. Council of Planning Librarians Exchange Bibliography, Vol. 890 (10 1975).Google Scholar
[2]Benston, G.Mortgage Redlining Research: A Review and Critical Analysis.” Journal of Bank Research (Spring 1981).Google Scholar
[3]Berkson, J. “Why I Prefer Logits to Probits.” Biometrika (04 1950), pp. 240251.Google Scholar
[4]Bock, R.Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research. New York: McGraw-Hill (1975), Pp. 235248.Google Scholar
[5]Doyle, P.The Application of Probit, Logit, and Tobit in Marketing: A Review.” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 5 (09 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Eisenbeis, R.Pitfalls in the Application of Discriminant Analysis in Business, Finance and Economics.” Journal of Finance, VOl. 32 (06 1977), PP. 875900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Eisenbeis, R., and Altman, E.. “Financial Application of Discriminant Analysis: A Clarification.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (03 1978), pp. 185196.Google Scholar
[8]Eisenbeis, R.; Gilbert, G.; and Avery, R.. “Investigating the Relative Importance of Individual Variables and Variable Subsets in Discriminant Analysis.” Communications in Statistics, Vol. 2, No. 3 (1973), pp. 205220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Engleman, L.Stepwise Logit Regression by Maximum Likelihood or Asymptotic Covariance.” Unpublished Paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
[10]Gilbert, E.On Discrimination Using Qualitative Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association (11 1968), pp. 13991412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[ll]Guttentag, J., and Wachter, S.. Redlining and Public Policy, Monograph 1980–1. New York: Salomon Brothers Center, New York University (1980).Google Scholar
[12]Halperin, M.; Blackwelder, W.; and Verter, J.. “Estimation of the Multivariate Logistic Risk Function and Maximum Likelihood Approaches.” Journal of Chronic Diseases, Vol. 24 (1971), pp. 125158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[13]Karson, M., and Martell, T.. “On the Interpretation of Individual Variables in Multiple Discriminant Analysis.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (03 1980), pp. 211218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Kshirsagar, A.Multivariate Analysis. New York: M. Dekker (1972).Google Scholar
[15]Lachenbruch, P.Discriminant Analysis. New York: Hafner Press (1975).Google Scholar
[16]Lachenbruch, P.. “An Almost Unbiased Method of Obtaining Confidence Intervals for the Probability of Misclassificat ion in Discriminant Analysis.” Biometrics, Vol. 23 (12 1967), pp. 639646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Lachenbruch, P., and Mickey, M.. “Estimation of Error Rates in Discriminant Analysis.” Teohnometrics, Vol. 10, No. 1 (1968), pp. 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Lachenbruch, P.; Sneeringer, C.; and Reno, L.. “Robustness of the Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Function to Certain Types of Non-normality.” Communications in Statistics, Vol. 1 (1973), pp. 3956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Lusht, K. “Study Relates Mortgage Lending to Borrower Traits.” The Mortgage Banker (03 1977), pp. 4245.Google Scholar
[20]McFadden, D. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In Frontiers in Econometrics, Zaremba, P., ed. New York: Academic Press (1974).Google Scholar
[21]McKelvey, R., and Zavoina, W.. “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 4 (1975), pp 103120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Press, J., and Wilson, S.. “Choosing between Logistic Regression and Discriminant Analysis.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 73 (12 1978), pp. 699705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1970 Census of Population and Housing.Google Scholar
[24]Vandell, K.; Hodas, B.; and Bratt, R.. Financial Institutions and neighborhood Decline: A Review of the Literature. A report prepared for the Federal Home Loan Bank Board by the Joint Center for Urban Studies at Harvard-MIT, under the direction of Arthur Solomon, P. (11 1974).Google Scholar
[25]Walter, J.A Discriminant Function for Earnings Price Ratios of Industrial Corporations.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 41 (02 1959), pp. 4452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Westin, Richard B.Predictions from Binary Choice Models.” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 2 (1974), pp. 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar