Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 4

  • Access

Interactivity between Candidates and Citizens on a Social Networking Site: Effects on Perceptions and Vote Intentions

  • Paul R. Brewer (a1), Michael Habegger (a2), Ruby Harrington (a2), Lindsay H. Hoffman (a3), Philip Edward Jones (a2) and Jennifer L. Lambe (a3)...

Abstract

Voters and political candidates increasingly use social networking sites (SNSs) such as Facebook. This study uses data from an online posttest-only experiment (N = 183) in analyzing how exposure to supportive or challenging user comments on a fictional candidate's Facebook page influenced participants’ perceptions of and willingness to vote for the candidate, as well as whether candidate replies to each type of user comments affected these outcomes. Participants who viewed a page with supportive comments and “likes” reported more favorable perceptions of and greater support for the candidate, relative to participants who viewed a page with challenging comments. Thus, the appearance of interactivity between a candidate and other users on the candidate's Facebook page can shape the responses of those viewing the page. However, exposure to candidate replies to either supportive or challenging comments did not lead to significantly more favorable perceptions or a greater likelihood of voting for the candidate.

  • View HTML

      • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Interactivity between Candidates and Citizens on a Social Networking Site: Effects on Perceptions and Vote Intentions
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Interactivity between Candidates and Citizens on a Social Networking Site: Effects on Perceptions and Vote Intentions
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Interactivity between Candidates and Citizens on a Social Networking Site: Effects on Perceptions and Vote Intentions
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

References

Hide All
Allport, Floyd H. 1924. Social Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Allport, Floyd H. 1940. “Polls and the Science of Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 4 (2): 249–257.
Cogburn, Derrick and Espinoza-Vasquez, Fatima K.. 2011. “From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign.” Journal of Political Marketing 10 (1–2): 189–213.
Dolan, Eric W. 2011. Sen. Scott Brown Aide Caught Using Twitter ‘Sock Puppet’ to Mock Opponent. Raw Story, (August 24). (http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/24/sen-scott-brown-aide-caught-using-fake-twitter-account-to-mock-opponent/).
Fernandes, Juliana, Giurcanu, Magda, Bowers, Keven W. and Neely, Jeffrey C.. 2010. “The Writing on the Wall: A Content Analysis of College Students’ Facebook Groups for the 2008 Presidential Election.” Mass Communication and Society 13 (5): 653–675.
Hanson, Gary, Haridakis, Paul M. and Wagstaff, Audrey. 2010. “The 2008 Presidential Campaign: Political Cynicism in the Age of Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube.” Mass Communication and Society 13 (5): 584–607.
Haynes, Audrey A. and Pitts, Brian. 2009. “Making an Impression: New Media in the 2008 Presidential Nomination Campaigns.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (1): 53–58.
Huckfeldt, R. Robert and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, Thomas J. and Perlmutter, David D.. 2010. “Introduction: The Facebook Election.” Mass Communication and Society 13 (5): 554–559.
Kushin, Matthew J. and Yamamoto, Masahiro. 2010. “Did Social Media Really Matter? College Students’ Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election.” Mass Communication and Society 13 (5): 608–630.
Lee, Eun-Je and Jang, Jeong-woo. 2013. “Not So Imaginary Personal Contact with Public Figures on Social Network Sites: How Affiliative Tendency Moderates Its Effects.” Communication Research 40 (1): 27–51.
Lee, Eun-Ju and Oh, Soo Y.. 2012. “To Personalize or Depersonalize? When and How Politicians’ Personalized Tweets Affect the Public's Reactions.” Journal of Communication 62 (6): 932–949.
Lee, Eun-Ju and Shin, Soo Y.. 2012a. “Are They Talking to Me? Cognitive and Affective Effects of Interactivity in Politicians’ Twitter Communication.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15 (10): 515–520.
Lee, Eun-Ju and Shin, Soo Y.. 2012b. “When the Medium is the Message: How Transportability Moderates the Effects of Politicians’ Twitter Communication.” Communication Research 41: 1088–1110. doi: 10.1177/0093650212466407.
Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. 2014. Social Networking Use. (http://www.pewresearch.org/data-trend/media-and-technology/social-networking-use/).
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stueff, Jack. 2011. Sarah Palin Has Secret ‘Lou Sarah’ Facebook Account to Praise Other Sarah Palin Facebook Account. Wonkette, (February 22). (http://wonkette.com/438825/is-sarah-palin-commenting-on-her-own-facebook-fan-page).
Sweetser, Kaye D. and Lariscy, Ruthann W.. 2008. “Candidates Make Good Friends: An Analysis of Candidates’ Uses of Facebook.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 2 (3): 175–198.
Tedesco, John C. 2007. “Examining Internet Interactivity Effects on Young Adult Political Information Efficacy.” American Behavioral Scientist 50 (9): 1183–1194.
Tong, Stephanie T., Heide, Brandon V. D., Langwell, Lindsey and Walther, Joseph B.. 2008. “Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (3): 531–549.
Towner, Terri L. 2013. “All Political Participation Is Socially Networked? New Media and the 2012 Election.” Social Science Computer Review 31 (5): 527–541.
Utz, Sonja. 2009. “The (Potential) Benefits of Campaigning via Social Networking Sites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (2): 221–243.
Utz, Sonja. 2010. “Show Me Your Friends and I Will Tell You What Type of Person You Are: How One's Profile, Number of Friends, and Type of Friends Influence Impression Formation on Social Network Sites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15 (2): 314–335.
Walther, Joseph B., Heide, Brandon V. D., Hamel, Lauren M. and Shulman, Hillary C.. 2009. “Self-Generated Versus Other-Generated Statements and Impressions in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Test of Warranting Theory Using Facebook.” Communication Research 36 (2): 229–253.
Walther, Joseph B., Heide, Brandon V. D., Kim, Sang-Yeon, Westerman, David and Tong, Stephanie T.. 2008. “The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep?” Human Communication Research 34 (1): 28–49.
Walther, Joseph B. and Parks, Malcolm R.. 2002. “Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships.” In Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Warnick, Barbara, Xenos, Michael, Endres, Danielle and Gastil, John. 2006. “Effects of Campaign-to-User and Text-Based Interactivity in Political Candidate Campaign Web Sites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (3).
Wilson, Robert E., Gosling, Samuel D. and Graham, Lindsay T.. 2012. “A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (3): 203–220.
Woolley, Julia K., Limperos, Anthony M. and Oliver, Mary B.. 2010. “The 2008 Presidential Election, 2.0: A Content Analysis of User-Generated Political Facebook Groups.” Mass Communication and Society 13 (5): 631–652.
Zhang, Weiwu, Johnson, Thomas J., Seitzer, Trent and Bichard, Shannon L.. 2010. “The Revolution Will Be Networked: The Influence of Social Networking Sites on Political Attitudes and Behavior.” Social Science Computer Review 28 (1): 75–92.

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Brewer supplementary material
Supplemental Appendix

 PDF (11.8 MB)
11.8 MB
  • Cited by 4

  • Access

Interactivity between Candidates and Citizens on a Social Networking Site: Effects on Perceptions and Vote Intentions

  • Paul R. Brewer (a1), Michael Habegger (a2), Ruby Harrington (a2), Lindsay H. Hoffman (a3), Philip Edward Jones (a2) and Jennifer L. Lambe (a3)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed