No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
ROUNDTABLE ON TERI L. CARAWAY'S “DE-THAKSINIZING THAILAND: THE LIMITS OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN” – ERIK MARTINEZ KUHONTA
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2021
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Article Commentary Roundtable
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © East Asia Institute 2021
Footnotes
In this roundtable, Kuhonta, Hicken, and Selway consider Caraway's “De-Thaksinizing Thailand: The Limits of Institutional Design” offering up defenses of institutionalist approaches to the rise of Thai Rak Thai. Caraway responds.
References
REFERENCES
Anderson, Benedict R. 1996. “Elections and Participation in Three Southeast Asian Countries,” in The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia, edited by Taylor, Robert H., 12–33. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Press and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ESCAP (Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific). 2002–2003. “A Note on Unemployment in the Wake of The Asian Economic Crisis and Some Responses.” Bulletin on Asia-Pacific Perspectives, 37–46.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, Paul D. 2000. “Colonial Masters, National Politicos, and Provincial Lords: Central Authority and Local Autonomy in the American Philippines, 1900–1913.” Journal of Asian Studies 59 (2): 277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhonta, Erik Martinez. 2014. “Southeast Asia and Comparative-Historical Analysis: Region, Theory and Ontology on a Wide Canvas.” Pacific Affairs 87 (3): 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidel, John. 1999. Capital, Coercion, and Crime: Bossism in the Philippines. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar