OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Adolescents with congenital heart defects (CHD) have an elevated risk for future cardiovascular events, but information about their risk for e-cigarette use (“vaping”) is unknown. This study aims to present preliminary findings on gender differences in the association of impulsive behavior and vaping susceptibility from an ongoing investigation. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Adolescents with CHD (12-18 years; N=63) reported their vaping susceptibility and completed subjective (UPPS-P)/objective (Iowa Gambling Task; IGT) assessments of impulsive behavior previously associated with tobacco use. The UPPS-P includes 5 facets: 1) negative urgency (impulsivity under negative emotions), 2) positive urgency (impulsivity under positive emotions), 3) lack of premeditation (acting without thinking), 4) lack of perseverance (inability to focus), and 5) sensation seeking (seeking thrilling experiences). The IGT is a computerized task that creates conflict between immediate reward and delayed punishment via selections from advantageous/disadvantageous card decks. Linear regressions stratified by gender determined associations between vaping susceptibility and impulsivity. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Nearly 30% (29.7%) of adolescents with CHD were susceptible to vaping. Negative urgency was associated with vaping susceptibility among females (β = 0.44, p = .035) but not males (β = 0.25, p = .128). Positive urgency was associated with vaping susceptibility among males (β = 0.37, p = .021) and trended toward significance among females (β = 0.40, p = .058). Lack of premeditation was associated with vaping susceptibility among males (β = 0.36, p = .025) but not females (β = 0.15, p = .490). The association between lack of perseverance and vaping susceptibility trended toward significance among males (β = 0.30, p = .064) but not females (β = -0.18, p = .413). IGT performance was not associated with susceptibility to vaping among either gender. UPPS-P facets and IGT performance were not significantly correlated. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The association of impulsivity and vaping susceptibility appears to be characterized by emotion-based rash action (positive/negative urgency) for females and by decreased conscientiousness (lack of premeditation/perseverance) for males. If replicated, the findings have implications for assessment of vaping risk and tailored intervention.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Developmental dyslexia is a common reading disability (RD) which negatively impacts academic success. To address the role of early language experience on RD, we tested if the reported differences in gray matter volume (GMV) in RD also manifests in poor readers with a bilingual language background. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We studied 54 Spanish-English Bilingual Typical Readers with Oral Reading Recognition Test (ORRT) scores above 100 (avg. =113 ± 10), 51 Spanish-English Bilinguals with RD with ORRT scores below 92 (avg. =84 ± 7), 54 English Monolingual Typical Readers with ORRT scores above 100 (avg. =113 ± 10) and 51 English Monolinguals with RD with ORRT scores below 92 (avg. =84 ± 7) from the Adolescent Brain & Cognitive Development Study. All groups had an average age of 12 ± 0.7 years and were matched for sex and self-ratings of English ability. Structural magnetic resonance images were analyzed using Voxel-Based Morphometry and the bilingual and monolingual groups were separately compared in two-sample t-tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Monolinguals with RD had less GMV than the Monolingual Typical Readers in the right supramarginal gyrus (Brodmanns Area (BA) 40; MNI Coordinates: 69, -27, 39) (p=0.011) similar to the right superior temporal finding reported in the existing literature. However, a comparison of Bilinguals with RD and Bilingual Typical Readers did not show any GMV differences in superior temporal regions. Instead, our Bilinguals with RD had less GMV compared to the Spanish-English Bilingual Typical Readers in the right superior frontal gyrus (BA 11; MNI Coordinates: 21, 44, -24) extending to the middle frontal gyrus (BA 10) (p = 0.014). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that the neuroanatomical bases of RD in Spanish-English Bilingual children are not the same as those observed for monolinguals, and biological models developed in monolinguals cannot be generalized. This has implications for diagnoses and treatment of RD in bilinguals.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Pain Catastrophizing is a negative coping mechanism involving rumination, magnification, and helplessness and is associated with worse chronic pain. The neurobiological mechanisms underlying this relationship are poorly understood. We aim to examine the intrinsic activity of a functional pathway in patients with chronic orofacial pain. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This is the second phase of a parent study examining genetics, placebos, and the brain in temporomandibular disorders (TMD). We intend to recruit 120 of the original 398 TMD patients for this phase. Participants completed the Graded Chronic Pain Scale to assess TMD pain intensity and disability and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Behaviorally, pain catastrophizing scores and pain intensity and disability will be analyzed using structural equation modeling. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging will be used to record intrinsic brain activity. The functional connectivity between the posterior cingulate, anterior insula, and periaqueductal grey will be assessed as a causal pathway relating pain catastrophizing to pain intensity and disability. Mediation analyses will be used to test causality. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate that greater engagement in catastrophic thinking about pain increases the functional connectivity strength between the posterior cingulate, anterior insula, and periaqueductal grey, which ultimately leads to heightened perception of pain intensity and disability. Therefore, we expect to see increased functional connectivity in those with high pain catastrophizing levels as compared to those with low pain catastrophizing levels, and that this pathway will mediate the relationship between pain catastrophizing and pain intensity and disability. Further, we predict that helplessness will most strongly correlate with the change in functional connectivity as compared to rumination and magnification. Results will be presented in full at the conference. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding how pain catastrophizing can influence chronic pain pathways will not only promote a more integrative approach to chronic pain management but will also help identify the mechanisms by which pain itself develops and persists in the particularly vulnerable pain population of TMD.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Insulin dosing is crucial for regulating blood glucose in cardiac surgery patients, yet it requires the use of cumbersome insulin dosing charts. To streamline this process, an electronic insulin calculator (IC) is trialed in the cardiac operating rooms and intensive care unit. This study compares glycemic control prior to and after institution of IC. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using the EHR, a retrospective population of 3,164 cardiac surgery patient charts from 12/19/19 - 11/06/20 were obtained. Baseline, intra-operative, and ICU blood glucose values were obtained from each patients admission. Using this data, a baseline level of glycemic control throughout a cardiac surgery patients stay was established. A preliminary cohort of 244 patients were then chosen to be managed with the new IC. Baseline, intra-operative, and ICU blood glucose values were obtained in this group for comparison. Paired t tests were used to compare the IC group of patients to the retrospective group of patients. Additional subgroup analysis was performed to assess IC efficacy for on pump vs off pump cardiac surgeries. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The 244 patients managed with the IC showed significantly reduced average blood glucose values during their time in the ICU compared to those previously not managed with the IC (185 mg% vs 153 mg%, p= 0.02). Additionally, a trend towards a reduction in last operating room blood glucose level was also noted. Lastly, average blood glucose levels were significantly reduced for patients undergoing on pump cardiac surgeries compared to off pump surgeries (157 mg% vs 149 mg%, p = 0.03). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Preliminary results suggest IIC to be associated with better intra and postoperative blood glucose control. More data is being collected to test its association with outcomes.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of this study is to decipher the mechanisms by which breast cancers evade the immune system to facilitate metastasis through the lymphatic vasculature. We believe this is caused, in part, by semaphorin 7A (SEMA7A) as its expression is associated with increased lymphatic vessels, tumor-associated macrophages, and metastasis in breast cancer. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We have observed that breast cancer cells, lymphatics, and macrophages exhibit SEMA7A-dependent expression of PD-L1 in vitro, which may make SEMA7A+ tumors more sensitive to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies. Therefore, we utilized multiple orthotopic, immunocompetent mouse models to determine if SEMA7A expression makes tumors more susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade. E0771 and 66cl4 mouse mammary carcinoma cells were injected orthotopically into the #4 mammary fat pads. Once tumors reached 50-100 mm^3 mice were injected intraperitoneally with 250ug of anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or IgG control every third day. Tumors were measured with calipers every other day and harvested for flow cytometry to determine the effect of immune checkpoint blockade on the TME in SEMA7A+ tumors. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We reveal that growth of SEMA7A overexpressing (OE) tumors, but not controls, was significantly slowed with both anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments. Flow cytometric analysis of cells from the TME revealed increased LECs, TAMs, and PoEMs in SEMA7A+ tumors, compared to controls – all populations had higher PD-L1 expression, which was decreased with both anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. We also observed a decrease in PD-L1 expression on the tumor cells with treatment. Furthermore, LEC, TAM, and PoEM presence was decreased within the TME alongside increased presence of activated CD4 and CD8 T cells. Collectively, our results suggest that SEMA7A expression in breast cancers activates a major pathway associated with immune evasion and helps to establish a pro-tumor microenvironment. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: SEMA7A expression establishes a pro-tumor microenvironment, which can be targeted with readily available FDA approved drugs such as immune checkpoint-based therapies. Since SEMA7A+ breast cancers have high rates of metastasis, more specific treatments for these patient populations should be explored.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This project aimed to investigate differences between isometric and isotonic systems for low and high frequency contractions. Intracellular changes in pH caused by the rate of exercise differ in their effect on PCr. The project assessed the reproducibility between these exercise methods. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Four subjects were studied (2F/2M, avg. age 27 years). 31P-MRS spectra were measured in the vastus lateralis (VL) using a 3T MRI scanner using a 31P/1H surface coil. In the isometric studies, the (supine) subjects legs were supported by a wedge pad and restrained by straps over the hips and knee with a resistance strap over one ankle. In the isometric studies, the (prone) subjects legs were fit into machine designed to induce isometric exercise. There were 4 exercise bouts that differed by exercise type and frequency and, consequently, duration. 31P-MR spectra were acquired from a 25mm slab of leg positioned parasagittal along the VL. Analyses were done using jMRUI and R. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: With an increase in sample size, we expect differences between recovery time constants, tau, of PCr between the different exercise frequency groups alluded to by other studies investigating recovery rates in bicep skeletal muscle. From the preliminary data, we obtained large limits of agreement of tau = 0.053 s-1 & tau =-0.074 s-1 from using Bland-Altman analysis. As we increase our sample size, we anticipate that we will see differences of PCr recovery rates between the exercise types as well. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Current studies that investigate the differences in PCr recovery rates between different metabolic states differ in the exercise methods employed on subjects. This study aims to standardize PCr recovery assessment in the VL for more interpretable and applicable assessments of metabolic function.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Parent stress and coping impacts reward and motivation circuits during child development which influence self-regulation. One well known maladaptive coping response is alcohol or drinking-to-cope (DTC). This study assessed differences in stress and child behaviors among DTC parents as compared to non-DTC parents. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Baseline data was used from parents of a 2-5-year-old who were screened for a larger study assessing a mindfulness-based parent stress reduction intervention to improve healthy choices for themselves and their families. The sample included 172 parent-child dyads, mean parent age was 34.4 (6.1) years old, 56.3% white, mean child age was 3.6 (1.2) years old, 52.3% male. Subjective stress was assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), parent-specific stress was assessing using the Parenting Stress Index (PSI), DTC was assessed using the COPE inventory, and child behaviors were assessed using the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment. To investigate the differences in stress and child behaviors between DTC parents and non-DTC parents independent samples t-tests were conducted. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: DTC was significantly correlated with PSS (r= 0.23, p<.01), PSI (r= 0.26, p<.01), child self-control (r= -0.16, p= .03), child attention problems (r= 0.22, p<.01), and total behavioral concerns (r= 0.16, p=.04). After excluding those who do not drink alcohol at all, we found significantly higher perceived stress among DTC parents (M= 27.83, SD= 9.79) compared to non-DTC parents (M= 23.79, SD= 8.40), t(80)= 2.02, p= .02. For children, we found significantly higher aggression scores for children of DTC parents (M= 47.16, SD= 31.69) compared to children of non-DTC parents (M=35.83, SD=25.72), t(84)= 1.83, p= .04. And greater attention problems among children of DTC parents (M= 73.97, SD= 26.77) compared to children of non-DTC parents (M= 56.71, SD= 34.09), t(84)=2.63, p=.01. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Stress and DTC may contribute to negative behaviors in children. An intervention designed to decrease stress and increase adaptive coping mechanism in parents could benefit health child socioemotional and behavioral development. Future analyses will examine third variable effects in the relationship between stress, coping, and child behaviors.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Illuminate processes and findings of the Environmental Scan of Adaptive Capacity and Preparedness of CTSAs done by the CTSA Working Group. Share challenges, strategies, and lessons learned for CTSAs to build Capacity to address clinical and translational barriers while responding to emergencies. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: An Environmental Scan approach for searching, collecting, analyzing and using information from diverse sources regarding CTSA hubs experiences during emergency as related to research implementation, translation, support, adaptation, and preparedness: - Triangulating multiple data sources and mixed methods (e.g., literature review, document/RPPR analysis, and expert review); - Secondary analysis of the JCTS COVID-19 Survey of the CTSAs: challenges, lessons learned, and practices that work in various program components/areas; - Using feedback of CTSA professionals from multiple disciplines to enhance our knowledge of emergency preparedness and efficient adaptation to public health and other crises. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The E-scan approach helped identify challenges, successful practices, and evidence-based strategies for building adaptive capacity and preparedness of CTSAs across various scientific sectors of the translational science spectrum. Some of the findings include: - Roadmaps for the creation of new collaborative research resources (biobanks; data repositories, etc.); - Rapid clinical and research decision making during public health crises; - New community-based research strategies to facilitate communication, research dissemination, and participant recruitment based on existing trust-based networks; - Innovative resource allocation to guarantee continuity of training and research opportunities for trainees. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The Environmental Scan of the Adaptive Capacity of CTSA hubs provides useful knowledge and tools to diverse clinical research stakeholders for mitigating the impact of a disaster via adjusting programs, practices, and processes, and building capacity for effective, emergency-ready and responsive research, training, and community engagement.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The host immune response during sepsis is now recognized to have anti-inflammatory pathophysiology. We aim to determine whether mitochondrial dysfunction of leukocytes predicts which critically ill septic patients develop immune paralysis and to identify differences in cellular metabolites between patients with and without immune paralysis. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Critically ill septic and control adult patients were recruited from one of 6 ICUs in a single-center tertiary care academic hospital. After enrollment, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from a tube of whole blood on day 0-1 after ICU admission. Flow cytometry to quantify monocyte HLA-DR was performed to determine whether patients were immune paralyzed or not. Mitochondrial functional assays of PBMCs were performed with inhibitors of the electron transport chain to assess for differences in oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis utilization. Metabolic profiling of cell pellets was performed to evaluate for specific metabolites and pathways associated with immune paralyzed patients. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were recruited, including 62 control and 39 septic patients. 81 patients had immune paralysis status available for analysis. 52% of all recruited subjects were immune paralyzed. Of these, 58% were controls and 75% were septic. Immune paralyzed septic and control patients showed features of reduced utilization of oxidative phosphorylation (ox phos) including reduced basal respiration, ATP production and maximal respiration compared with non-immune paralyzed septic and control patients. Immune paralyzed septic patients showed diminished glycolysis utilization compared with septic non-immune paralyzed patients. Finally, cellular kynurenine and quinolinate levels were low in both immune paralyzed control and septic patients compared with non-immune paralyzed patients. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The PBMCs of immune paralyzed septic patients show evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction, with reduced ox phos and glycolysis utilization. Low levels of kynurenine and quinolinate, metabolite precursors to NAD+, in immune paralyzed patients may signal key deficiencies and targetable therapeutic avenues for reversal of an immune paralyzed state.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To demonstrate safety and limit damage to off-target organs, we will be determining dosimetry parameters through experimentation and Monte Carlo simulations with our brachy therapy applicator designed to improve upon current designs to treat a 3-dimensional volume. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Low-cost materials were used to manufacture our High Dose Rate (HDR) applicator and a readily available after loading system was used to load our configuration with a radioactive source. The dosimetry of our device was analyzed using commercially available software and external beam therapy films to generate depth dose profiles and superficial dose distribution. Additionally, we attempt to confirm Task Group No. 43 (TG-43) dosimetry parameters using Monte Carlo simulations for our device. These data were compared with currently available applicators used for intraoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate that we will be able to validate dosimetry parameters for our device in preparation for clinical use. We aim to show our dose distributions align well with proposed target volumes while considering the composition and shape of our applicator. We hope to demonstrate that, unlike current applicators, our design is more effective at treating a 3-dimensional target volume. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: By 2040, pancreatic cancer will be the second-largest cause of cancer-related deaths. Even with current brachytherapy applicators, 30-40% of pancreatic cancer seems to recur near the surgical site after surgery. By preventing local recurrence, we hope to improve patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To develop a two-staged convolutional neural network to identify the ovary and antral follicles within ovarian ultrasound images and determine its reliability and feasibility compared to conventional techniques in 2D and 3D ultrasonography image analysis. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: De-identified and archived ultrasonographic images of women across the reproductive spectrum (N=500) will be used in the study. These ultrasound images will be labeled by experienced raters to train a two-staged convolutional neural network (CU-Net). CU-Net will first separate the entire ovary from the background and subsequently identify all antral follicles within the ovary. Following training, the CU-Net will evaluate a second set of independent images (N=100) to determine performance accuracy. Three specialized raters will establish the reliability and feasibility of CU-Net compared to conventional 2D and 3D ovarian ultrasound image analysis methods. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The labeled training dataset of ovarian ultrasound images is expected to successfully train the CU-Net and allow for accurate identification of the ovary and the total number of antral follicles in the second testing set of ultrasound images. When compared to conventional 2D and 3D ultrasound image analysis methods, CU-Net is expected to have similar accuracy when compared to the gold-standard method (2D-Offline with Grid) and outperform other approaches, such as 2D-Real Time and 3D volume software (VOCAL and Sono-AVC). However, CU-Net is anticipated to be the fastest and most reliable method across users, supporting its clinical feasibility. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study will immediately translate to providing a standardized platform that can improve the accuracy, reliability, and time demand required for the evaluation of ovarian ultrasounds across users and clinical and research settings.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: MiaA is a highly conserved prenyl transferase that catalyzes synthesis of the i6A37 tRNA modification in E. coli. While transcriptional regulation of MiaA is well characterized, there is no information on the MiaA post-transcriptional regulation. The aim of this study is to characterize the post-transcriptional regulation of the MiaA gene in E. coli. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To characterize the post-transcriptional regulation of miaA, we executed a targeted genetic screen of an E. coli small RNA library on a miaA-lacZ translational reporter fusion strain to identify small RNAs (sRNAs) that modulate MiaA translation or transcription termination. We also measured MiaA mRNA levels and miaA-lacZ activity in the absence or over-expression of candidate sRNA regulators of MiaA. We also measured MiaA mRNA levels in the absence of RNaseE and PNPase, two enzymes involved in mRNA turnover. Finally, we measured the ability of purified recombinant CsrA to bind to the MiaA mRNA transcript in vitro. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We identified the carbon sensing sRNA CsrB and its cognate protein interaction partner CsrA, as potential post-transcriptional regulators of MiaA. Over-expression of CsrB fully repressed miaA-lacZ activity and MiaA mRNA levels. The absence of CsrA resulted in a defective miaA-lacZ activity and a 10-fold decrease in MiaA mRNA levels. We also identified an increase in the MiaA mRNA half-life particularly in the absence of RNaseE. Our results demonstrate an additional layer of regulation for the miaA operon by the CsrA/CsrB protein-sRNA system. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: MiaA is a highly conserved bacterial protein. Our data may represent phenomena in an array of bacteria that could be targeted by novel antibiotics. The human MiaA homologue, TRIT1, plays a role in mitochondrial disorders. We anticipate that information garnered from MiaA studies will elucidate TRIT1 function and its role in mitochondrial disorders.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Six CTSA sites formed a collaboration to DEVELOP, DEMONSTRATE, AND DISSEMINATE new infrastructure to streamline collection and analysis of research participant feedback, using the Research Participant Perception Survey (RPPS), common standards, and customized REDCap-based tools, to improve the clinical research enterprise. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: DEVELOP charter, consensus approach, core survey, deployment standards, data-use agreements; define meta-data, system requirements for the infrastructure, use-cases. Engage stakeholders for broad institutional and community input. Build RPPS/REDCap project, visual analytics Dashboard External Module, and Program Dashboard module for evaluation. Configure to use with Multilingual Module. DEMONSTRATE by implementing site-based use cases that reflect local priorities and span diverse populations, testing different methods of survey deployment (REDCap, patient portal, SMS) to showcase utility and flexibility. Generate data for local and inter-institutional benchmarking. Refine, then DISSEMINATE new infrastructure across the Consortium and REDCap community for broader testing and uptake. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The project team refined the RPPS survey for inclusivity and mode of informed consent; defined standards for survey timing, sampling, and study metadata; configured the data dictionary in English and Spanishfor use with the multi-lingual module ; developed tools for project evaluation. Stakeholder engagement identified themes of anticipated value and fears about feedback. We designed an At-a-Glance Dashboard to display survey results with detailed analytics and filters. A REDCap application programming interface will send de-identified site data to the EPV Consortium Database to support benchmarking. Full implementation began November 2021 and will scale in 2022. Dissemination to Consortium and REDCap users is ongoing through presentations and a project website (www.Rockefeller.edu/research/epv). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Direct feedback from representative populations about their experiences in research is essential to understand and resolve barriers to broad participation in research. Streamlined RPPS/REDCap infrastructure provides a platform for local and national benchmarking, and collection of actionable data to improve clinical research.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Think Tanks’ aim to assist faculty innovators along the path from discovery to commercialization; serving as a one-stop-shop where investigators can access advice, pilot funds, and direction toward other available resources within the Indiana CTSI. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Faculty receive guidance from a pool of advisors in the drug and device industry, as well as their respective university commercialization offices; who serve as an essential resource for a wide range of scientific, technical, clinical, business, and regulatory questions. Investigators submit a simple intake form to connect with a project facilitator for detailed guidance prior to formal meetings. Projects are guided from start to finish with robust tracking and milestone-based funding to help generate data for Investigational New Drug (IND) or Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) applications. Project tracking is conducted using REDCap, which is used for all investigator submissions, with internal processes also tracked in REDCap. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: From Feb-Aug 2021; the Think Tanks provided feedback to 15 drug projects and 6 medical device projects. This included 12 from Indiana University; 4 from Purdue University; and 5 from the University of Notre Dame. Interestingly; drug innovations were submitted primarily by tenure track faculty (100%) with a history of NIH/NSF funding (50%); while device innovations were submitted primarily by clinical faculty without a history of NIH/NSF funding (66%). Based on first-round feedback, a total of approximately $3;400 in pilot funds were provided. Efforts are underway to obtain survey-based feedback from all applicants to date; which will be used to inform future program modifications. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The budding “Think Tank” program provides faculty with a broad perspective of the entire drug and medical device development process, helping investigators understand the critical interplay development stages. Future work seeks to enhance faculty engagement in, and understanding of the commercialization process across Indiana CTSI institutions.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To determine the utility of any standard, one must first evaluate whether or not the standard meets the needs of the use case it is meant to support. We aim to quantify data availability of the HL7 FHIR standard to support data collection for three state-based registries in a rural state and measure the potential effects on data quality and collection time. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: FHIR mapping will be performed to assess the level of HL7 FHIR standard completeness (or data element coverage) in supporting data collection for the three registries. A systematic approach, previously developed and used by Garza and Zozus, will be used to map registry data elements to corresponding HL7 FHIR standard resources. FHIR coverage will be calculated as a percentage (total data elements “Available in FHIR” vs. total data elements overall) and will be observed across different domain areas (i.e., demographics vs. medications vs. vital signs, etc.) in order to identify the domains with the least and most coverage. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Although there have been informatics solutions that relied on data exchange standards to improve data collection, none have actually evaluated the coverage of the standard for supporting the needs of clinical data registries. To address this gap, we aim to evaluate the availability of the HL7 FHIR standard to support data collection for three state-based registries. These results will provide insight into the generalizability of a FHIR-based solution to support data acquisition and processing across multiple registries and demonstrate the potential for seamless exchange of that data for secondary use in clinical and translational research. Quantifying the coverage will also be used to further advance its development in order to meet the data collection needs of state and national clinical data registries. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Registries often rely on manual abstraction of EHR data. These manual approaches have had a negative impact on data quality and cost, often due to the complexities associated with collection and mapping of the data to fit the registry model. HL7 FHIR has the potential to address these issues by automating part or all of the data collection process.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Writers with high self-efficacy perform better than writers with low self-efficacy regardless of writing ability. We investigated whether Shut Up & Write® (SUAW), a less-intensive writing intervention, produced gains in writing self-efficacy similar to those reported by intensive, longer-term interventions. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Meetings were held 2x/wk for 5 wks via Zoom, for 1 hour. Participants were encouraged to attend at least 1x/wk. The 1st few mins were devoted to a discussion of what each person planned to work on. Then, a timer was set and each writer muted themselves, shuttered their webcam, and wrote. When the alarm sounded, everyone returned to the group, and discussed what was accomplished. We measured writing self-efficacy before & after participating in SUAW using a pre-post survey design and used two-tailed paired t-tests to test for significant differences between pre- and post-test means. SUAW participants (n=23) were in 1 of 2 categories: 10 were self-selected LEADS scholars from MSIs, and 13 were medical students in a palliative care program. 86% were URB, 78% were female. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Seven (30%) SUAW participants completed both the pre- and post-survey. Individuals showed significantly higher agreement from pre-to-post on the self-efficacy item “I have a generally positive attitude toward writing” (p=0.047) using a 5-point Likert scale from “completely agree” to “completely disagree.” Most other items did not indicate significant change between pre- and post-survey. The mean of the question “How satisfied were you with this Shut Up & Write activity?” which appeared only on the post-survey (n=10) was 1.10 (1=extremely satisfied, 5=extremely dissatisfied). Anticipated result: We suspect that the benefits of SUAW are best actualized by ongoing attendance, and that benefits are cumulative. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that participation in SUAW promotes writing self-efficacy in early-career URB researchers. This is an exciting finding because publishing ones research is essential for academic advancement, and research supports a relationship between writing self-efficacy and writing production. This may curtail URB scientists’ rate of attrition.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To maximize health outcomes from their work, basic researchers must understand the process by which lab discoveries are translated into clinical care. We developed an academic course designed to provide students in our Clinical and Translational Sciences PhD program with an in-depth understanding of translational applications of basic research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A preliminary needs assessment was done with students, educators, and clinicians to identify the course content. Based on these data, didactic modules including research question identification, research team development, participant recruitment, and research data collection were piloted in a synchronous, virtual course. Then, for 6 weeks, students shadowed clinical mentors who worked in the students research areas. Finally, with their mentors, students developed and presented clinical research protocols. Student pre- and post-course surveys gauged alignment of course objectives and learning outcomes. A post-course, focus group with students gathered feedback on course content, structure, and students confidence in implementing their experiences from the course into real-world settings. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Six MD/PhD and PhD students participated in the pilot course. Pre/post-assessments (n=4) showed students were more confident in clinical question/research protocol formulation, development of patient recruitment/enrollment strategies, and integration of research methodologies into their research projects after completing the course. Students asked for additional content on budgeting and grant funding. Post-course focus group participants (n=2) appreciated the experience of writing a clinical protocol and the flipped classroom teaching style, which allowed them to network with clinical faculty leading didactic sessions. Students also noted course content was relevant and motivating, although they suggested adding content about clinical trials measures to enhance their shadowing experiences. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: A course that combines didactic and clinical experiential training provides a robust, translational research foundation for basic scientists. This training is critical to help them contribute to the effective/efficient translation of lab discoveries to clinical practice. Future course development will include students from other PhD programs.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Despite calls for the integration of Education for Sustainable Healthcare (ESH) into health professional training programs, most curricula have yet to adapt accordingly. This qualitative study sought to understand faculty perspectives on ESH knowledge, interest, barriers, and facilitators. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: From 2018 to 2020, 71 health professional education faculty from 6 University of California (UC) campuses participated in ESH integration workshops. Using purposeful sampling based on gender and campus, a subset of workshop faculty participants were selected to participate in individual interviews. Interviews were conducted via Zoom using a structured interview guide, eliciting participants experience integrating ESH, perceived barriers and facilitators, and perspectives on student, faculty, and health science leadership knowledge and interest. Transcripts were double coded with an inductive-deductive approach using Dedoose, reconciled, and analyzed to identify themes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Participants included 17 faculty at 6 UC campuses representing diverse health disciplines. Although participants noted high general awareness of and interest in climate change among students and faculty, they observed a lack of specific, health-relevant knowledge, resulting in discomfort communicating with others on climate and health. Perceived barriers to expansion of ESH included limited curricular space, competing topics, and lack of faculty expertise. Participants posited that framing climate change in health terms, establishing learning objectives and protected faculty time, identifying connections to ESH within existing research and curriculum, and obtaining commitments from campus leadership would facilitate successful ESH integration. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings reinforce student and faculty interest in ESH curricular integration and identify important barriers and facilitators, lending context for educators planning ESH infusion. Training of faculty on climate health is urgently needed for ESH integration in health professional education.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Project objectives: Collect, analyze, redesign, and redeploy the follow-up surveys sent after services rendered or educational offerings attended to improve outcome measurement. Presentation objectives: Provide a process for others to optimize their assessment surveys. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A team of interdisciplinary experts from Evaluation and Improvement, Workforce Development, and Administration took a systematic and collaborative approach to optimizing service and educational offering assessment. The team collected all 35 existing surveys currently in use at the CTSA, developed a matrix table to organize findings, cross-analyzed/normed to recognize and reduce bias, engaged other staff and faculty at specific intervals to encourage buy-in, and responded to feedback. The team then updated both surveys and format, programmed revised surveys into a centralized platform, and provided instructions and training for implementation. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This effort resulted in streamlining both the assessment process and the surveys used by the Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute (SC CTSI). Instead of using different versions of surveys or none at all, now SC CTSI commits to using the same follow-up survey for events and for educational offerings institute-wide, and agrees to store and access that data via a single platform, REDCap, allowing any member to see data in real time. This will allow SC CTSI to monitor and evaluate its short-term outcomes at an institutional level, and determine areas for improvement or best practices. Future plans include training on survey data interpretation for decision making. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Presenters will share lessons learned and considerations when embarking on streamlining assessment practices institute-wide, highlighting the importance of leveraging educational methodology to go beyond measuring satisfaction and into measuring learning. Presenters will share revised surveys.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This study examines faculty mentor experiences in a summer research program for students traditionally underrepresented in translational research. The objectives are to understand mentor perspectives of the program and how their views were impacted by the pandemic-related pivot to a remote format. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: During the summer research program, students work with a faculty mentor on an ongoing research project. Program staff pair students with diverse faculty members who share their research interests. Our program has traditionally been offered as a residential in-person program but in 2020 we moved swiftly to a fully remote learning format. Students continued to work on research projects remotely and interacted virtually with their faculty mentors. For the past five cohort years, we have collected comparable data about faculty perspectives of their program experience, which allows us to evaluate the impact of the remote format on the faculty experience compared to that of the in-person format. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: For this study, we will examine data from five cohort years (2017-2021). A survey questionnaire was administered to mentors each year at the end of the summer research program. Data were collected on faculty satisfaction with the quality and amount of student work, the amount of time students spent on their projects, and how mentors communicated with students. In 2020 and 2021, three questions were added regarding satisfaction with the remote format. Quantitative data collected from both the in-person and remote cohorts will be compared using independent samples t-tests. Select quotes from open-ended qualitative questions will be used to illustrate mentors attitudes toward the program. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study addresses a gap in the literature about summer research programs, as previous work has primarily focused on trainees. As many training programs continue to remain remote or adopt hybrid models, these results have implications for the design of similar mentored research programs.