Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:59:33.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Japan to Manila and Back to Europe: The Abortive English Trade with Tonkin in the 1670s*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

Hoang Anh Tuan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is a well-known fact that the reconstitution of the English East India Company in the 1660s caused a significant revolution in its Asia trade. Coincidently with this improvement, the Company also attempted to expand its trade to East Asian countries, using its Bantam Agent, its only base in Southeast Asia, as a springboard for launching this strategy. Around 1668 the Court of Committees in London was looking for an appropriate opportunity to re-open relations with Japan through the channel of Cambodia. The plan of re-entering the Japan trade – in this the directors in London might have been influenced by their officials in Bantam or they themselves had overestimated its prospects – was then put into practice at the end of 1671. Forthe Company itself, trading with Japan would obviously be profitable, as it had observed at first hand the considerable success of the Dutch East India Company (VOC) over the last decades. The English in the East also grew convinced that the regional trade between Japan and other areas would reap extra profits for the Company. Among the selected targets was Tonkin, present-day northern Vietnam. At that time, its silks and other textiles were highly valued and could fetch good prices in Japan. Traders who took Tonkinese silks to Nagasaki were then able to purchase Japanese silver and copper. These precious metals would be brought back to invest in local merchandize at other factories to keep up the flow of the Japan trade and to supply marketable goods for Europe. The ultimate aim of the English in tradingwith Tonkin was, therefore, to create the so-called Tonkinese silk-for-Japanese silver trade, like that successfully undertaken by the Dutch since 1637. Besides, the search for new markets for English manufactured goods was another reason that spurred the Company on to carry out this plan.

Type
Articles
Information
Itinerario , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , November 2005 , pp. 73 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

The following sources are the Tonkin factory's records of the English East India Company, being preserved at the Oriental and India Office Collection, the British Library (London).Google Scholar
E/3/87, General of the Court of Committees to Bantam January 1668, 106v–107r.Google Scholar
E/3/87, General of the Court of Committees to Bantam 25 February 1669, 171r.Google Scholar
E/3/90, London General to Tonkin 2 October 1682, 42r–v.Google Scholar
E/3/91, Letter from London to Fort St. George 9 June 1686.Google Scholar
G/12/17-1, Journal Register of Tonkin factory 3 July 1672, 6v–7r.Google Scholar
G/12/17-1, Tonkin General to Bantam and London 10 October 1672, 36r–37v.Google Scholar
G/12/17-2, Tonkin General to Bantam 7 December 1672, 41r–55r.Google Scholar
G/12/17-2, Journal Register of Tonkin factory 1 August 1673, 73v.Google Scholar
G/12/17-2, Tonkin General to Bantam 10 August 1673, 74v–77v.Google Scholar
G/12/17-2, Tonkin General to Bantam 2 February 1674, 100v–105r.Google Scholar
G/12/17-2, Tonkin General to Bantam 24 July 1674, 110v–116v.Google Scholar
G/12/17-2, Journal Register of Tonkin factory ll-12May 1675, 133v.Google Scholar
G/12/17-2, Bantam General to Tonkin 4 May 1675, 138r–139v.Google Scholar
G/12/17-2, James, Thomas' letter to William Gyfford 25 December 1674, 139v–141r.Google Scholar
G/12/17-2, Tonkin General to Bantam 23 October 1675, 141v–146v.Google Scholar
G/12/17-2, Clause of the Court of Committees on Tonkin trade 1675, 152v–154r.Google Scholar
G/12/17-3, Tonkin General to Bantam and London 11 December 1676, 179v–186r.Google Scholar
G/12/17-3, Bantam General to Tonkin factory 29 May 1677, 201r–206r.Google Scholar
G/12/17-4, Tonkin General to Bantam 30 November 1677, 216v–220v.Google Scholar
G/12/17-5, Bantam General to Tonkin 5 June 1678, 226v–230r.Google Scholar
G/12/17-8, General of the Court of Committees and Bantam to Tonkin 12 August 1681 and 9 June 1682, 289r–295r.Google Scholar
G/12/17-8, Tonkin General to Bantam and London 28 December 1682, 303v–309r.Google Scholar
G/12/17-8, Tonkin General to Bantam and London 8 December 1682, 304r–308v.Google Scholar
G/17/12-9, Tonkin factory's records from May 1993 to July 1997, 318–380.Google Scholar
G/12/17-10, General of Fort St. George to Tonkin 11 May 1697, 480r–483r.Google Scholar
G/17/12-10, Tonkin factory's records from July to November 1997, 480–501.Google Scholar
Black, J., The British Seaborne Empire (New Haven and London, 2004).Google Scholar
Blusse, L., Remmelink, Willem, Smits, Ivo, eds, Bridging the Diuide, 400 Years the Netherlands - Japan (Leiden, 2000).Google Scholar
Boxer, C.R., Jan Company in Japan 1672–1674, Anglo-Dutch Rivalry in Japan and Formosa, The Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan, 2nd Series, VII, (S.I., s.n.,1931).Google Scholar
Boxer C.R., Jan Companie in War and Peace, 1602–1799 (London-Hong Kong, 1979).Google Scholar
, Chang, , Hsiu-jung et al., The English Factory in Taiwan, 1670–1685 (Taiwan, 1995).Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, K.N., The Trading World of Asia and the English East India Company, 1660–1760 (Cambridge, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coolhaas, W.Ph., Generate Missiven uan Gouuerneurs-Generaal en Raden aan Heren XVII der Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie I (1610–1638), III (1655–1674), IV (1675–1685) (The Hague, 1960, 1968, 1971).Google Scholar
Daghregister Gehouden int Casteel Batauia vant Passerende daer ter Plaetse als over Geheel Mederlandis India 1624–1682, Vols 20–31 (The Hague, 1931).Google Scholar
Farrington, A., The English Factory in Japan, 1613–1623, 2 vols (London, 1991).Google Scholar
Farrington, A.,Trading Places: The East India Company and Asia 1600–1834 (London, 2002).Google Scholar
Foster, W., England's Quest of Eastern Trade (London, 1931).Google Scholar
Gaastra, F.S., The Dutch East India Company, Expansion and Decline (Leuven, 2003).Google Scholar
Kham Dinh Viet Su Thong Giam Cuong Muc (The text and commentary of the complete mirror of Vietnamese history as ordered by the Emperor) (Hanoi, 1998).Google Scholar
Lamb, A., The Mandarin Road to Old Hue (London, 1970).Google Scholar
Lieberman, V., Strange Parallel: Southeast Asia in Global Context, c. 800–1830, I (Cambridge, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massarella, D., A World Elsewhere: European Encounter with Japan in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (London, 1990).Google Scholar
Thanh, Nguyen, Nha, , Tableau economique du Vietnam aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siecles (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
Pho Hien, the Centre of International Commerce in the 17th-18th Centuries (Hanoi, 1994).Google Scholar
Quiason, S.D., English ‘Country Trade with the Philippines, 1644–1765 (Quezon City, Philippines, 1966).Google Scholar
The, Thanh, Vy, , Ngoai Thuong Viet Nam Hoi the ky XVII, XVIII ua dau XIX (Vietnam's Foreign Trade in the 17th, 18th, and 19th Centuries) (Hanoi, 1961).Google Scholar
, Truong, Quynh, Huu et al., Dai Cuong Lich Su Viet Nam (A Brief History of Vietnam) I (Hanoi, 1999).Google Scholar
Basett, D.K., ‘The Trade of the English East India Company in the Far East, 1623–1684, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 1/4 (1960): 32–47, 145–57.Google Scholar
Blusse, L, ‘No Boats to China: The Dutch East India Company and the South China Sea Trade, 1635–1690’, Modern Asian Studies 30 (1996): 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M., ‘The Brits in Japan’, Monumenta Nipponica 47/2 (1992): 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, A., ‘English East India Company Documents Relating Pho Hien and Tonkin’, Pho Hien-the Centre of International Commerce in the 17th-18th Centuries (Hanoi, 1994), 148–161.Google Scholar
Frederic, M., ‘Indochinese Societies and European Traders: Different World of Trade? (17th-18th Centuries)’, in Ishizawa, Nguyen The Anh-Yoshiaki, eds, Commerce et Navigation en Asie du Sud-Est (XlVe-XIXe siecle) (Tokyo, 1999), 113–125.Google Scholar
Gaastra, F.S., ‘The Shifting Balance of Trade of the Dutch East India Company’, in Blusse, L. and Gaastra, F., eds, Companies and Trade, Essays on Overseas Trading Companies during Ancien Regime (Leiden, 1981), 47–69.Google Scholar
Klein, P.W., ‘De Tonkinees-Japanse Zijdehandel van de Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie en het lnter-Asiatische Verkeer in de 17e eeuw, in Frijhoff, W. and Hiemstra, M., eds, Bewogen en Bewegen (Tilburg, 1986), 152–177.Google Scholar
Maybon, C., ‘Gne Factorerie Anglaise au Tonkin au XVIIe siecle (1672–1697)’, BEFEO (1910): 169–204.Google Scholar
Ts'ao, Yung-ho, ‘The English East India Company and the Cheng Regime on Taiwan’, in Hsiu-jung, Chang et al., The English Factory in Taiwan, 1670–1685 (Taiwan, 1995), 1–19.Google Scholar
Taylor, K.W., ‘Surface Orientations in Vietnam: Beyond Histories of Nation and Region’, The Journal of Asian Studies 57 (1998): 949–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoang Anh, Tuan, Zijde tegen Zilver: The VOC-Tonkin Silk Trade, 1637–1670, Paper presented at the TANAP Conference ‘Asia in the Age of Partnership: Embracing a Common Asian Past’ (Gniversitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2005).Google Scholar