Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:02:46.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changing Forms of U.S. Hegemony in Puerto Rico: The Impact on the Family and Sexuality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

Extract

It has been over a hundred years since the U.S. took control of Puerto Rico. In that time, the way in which the U.S. perceived Puerto Rico has changed from a colony requiring Americanisation to, in the 1950s, its showcase of democracy in the Caribbean, to today, an island that still retains geopolitical importance for the U.S., but represents an increasing economic burden. The failure of Operation Bootstrap, as the Puerto Rican industrialization program was known, resulted in permanent large-scale unemployment, with a population dependent on federal transfers for a living, and a constant source of migration to the mainland, where over half of Puerto Ricans now live. I shall trace the outline of these three stages in U.S. hegemony over Puerto Rico, and argue that throughout the U.S. Congress was reluctant to fully incorporate Puerto Rico, because its population was deemed racially and socially inferior to that of the mainland. Though the removal of Spain from Puerto Rico, Cuba and the Philippines was considered part of the its ‘manifest destiny’, the United States never intended to incorporate these people so different from the U.S. as part of the American nation, as was done with its earlier acquisitions in Texas, Alaska or even Hawaii.

Type
Conference: ‘Costs and Benefits of Independence in the Caribbean’
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Duany, J., ‘Nation on the Move’, American Ethnologist 27/1 (2000) 530.Google Scholar

2 Négron-Muntaner, F., ‘English only Jamás but Spanish only Cuidador. Language and Nationalism in Contemporary Puerto Rico’ in: Négron-Muntaner, F. and Grosfoguel, Ramón eds, Puerto Rican jam: Essays on Culture and Politics (Minneapolis 1997) 257285.Google Scholar

3 Chatterjee, P., The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories (Princeton 1993) chapter 6.Google Scholar

4 Dietz, J., Economic History of Puerto Rico: Institutional Change and Capitalist Development (Princeton 1986) 8692.Google Scholar

5 Rivera, A. Quintero, Conflictos de Close y Politica en Puerto Rico (Rio Piedras 1976).Google Scholar

6 Dietz, Economic History, 122.

7 Ibid., 84.

8 Thompson, L., Nuestra Isla y Su Genle: la Constructión del ‘Otro’ Puertorriqueño en Our Islands and Their People (Rio Piedras 1995).Google Scholar

9 Findlay, E.J. Suarez, Imposing Decency: The Politics of Sexuality and Race in Puerto Rico, 1870– 1920 (Durham 1999) 88.Google Scholar

10 Calzada, J. Vázquez, Cunningham, Ineke, and del Valle, Zoraida Morales, La Poblatión de Puerto Rico y su Trayectoria Histórica (San Juan 1988).Google Scholar

11 Findlay, Imposing Decency, chapter 4.

12 Calzada, J. Vázquez, Cunningham, Ineke, and del Valle, Zoraida Morales, ‘Patrones de nupcialidad de la mujer puertorriqueña’, Revista Interamericana XI/3 (1981) 429.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., 433.

14 Findlay, Imposing Decency.

15 Dietz, Economic History, 175; del Carmen Baerga, M. ed., Género y Trabajo: La Industria de la Aguja en Puerto Rico el Caribe Hispánico (San Juan, Puerto Rico 1993).Google Scholar

16 Dietz, Economic History, 183.

18 Ibid., Table 5.7, 258.

19 Ibid., Table 5.13, 275.

20 Safa, Helen I., The Urban Poor of Puerto Rico: A Study in Development and Inequality (New York 1974).Google Scholar

21 Ibid., 20.

22 Vázquez Calzada, La Población, 53. On the basis of surveys, Vázquez Calzada (La Población, 63) suggests that the census figures underestimate the number of consensual unions, which in 1982 are closer to 12 per cent. He examines marital histories and shows that consensual unions are more frequent among women in their second or third union.

23 Hernandez-Angueira, Luisa, Mujeres Puertorriqueñas, Welfare y Globalizatión: Descontruendo el Estigma (Puerto Rico 2001).Google Scholar

24 Guerra, Lillian, Popular Expression and National Identity in Puerto Rico: The Struggle for Self, Community, and Nation (Gainesville 1998) 214.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., chapter 6.

26 Wolf, Kathleen, ‘Growing Up and Its Price in Three Puerto Rican Subcultures’, Psychiatry 15/4 L (1952) 414.Google Scholar

27 Presser, Harriet, Sterilization and Fertility Decline in Puerto Rico (Berkeley 1973).Google Scholar

28 Negrón-Muntaner and Grosfoguel, Puerto Rican Jam, 259–261.

29 Safa, The Urban Poor, 27.

30 In the U.S., where the stigma against public housing was even stronger than in Puerto Rico, a number of localities excluded or attempted to exclude pregnant women or unwed mothers from public housing. Solinger, Ricky, Wake Up Little Susie: Single Pregnancy and Race before Roe v. Wade (New York 2000) 47.Google Scholar

31 Safa, , ‘The Female-Based Household in Public Housing: A Case Study in Puerto Rico’, Human Organization 24/2 (Summer 1965) 1626.Google Scholar

32 Safa, The Urban Poor.

33 Dietz, Economic History, 244.

34 Rivera-Batiz, Francisco and Santiago, Carlos, Island Paradox: Puerto Rico in the 1990s (New York 1996) 4, 28.Google Scholar

35 Safa, , The Myth of the Male Breadwinner: Women and Industrialization in the Caribbean (Boulder 1995) 15.Google Scholar

36 Dietz, Economic History, 257.

37 Carmen Angelica Perez, then a graduate student at Rutgers University where I taught, assisted me in this study and conducted the survey of garment workers for her PhD dissertation.

38 Safa, The Myth of the Male Breadwinner.

39 Ibid., 15.

40 Dietz, Economic History, 289.

41 Ibid., 299.

42 Hernandez-Angueira, Mujeres Puertorriqueñas, 53.

44 Ibid., chapter 5.

45 Ibid., 94

46 Since the 1980 study was conducted outside the San Juan Metropolitan Area and half the sample lived in rural towns, this would also have made marriage and reproductive patterns more conservative. Female heads of household whose consensual unions have dissolved usually list themseles as ‘separated’, not single.

47 Colon, Alice, ‘Reestructuración industrial, empleo y pobreza en Puerto Rico y el Atlántico Medio de los Estados Unidos: la situación de las mujeres puertorriqueññas’, Revista de Ciendas Sociales 3 (1997) 135188.Google Scholar

48 Ibid., 160.

49 Garfinkel, Irwin and McLanahan, Sara, Single Mothers and Their Children (Washington D.C 1986).Google Scholar

50 Abramowitz, M., Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present (Boston 1989)Google Scholar; Fraser, Nancy, Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory (Minnesota 1989)Google Scholar; Gordon, Linda, Women, the State and Welfare (Wisconsin 1990)Google Scholar; Solinger, Wake Up Little Susie.

51 Solinger, Wake Up Little Susie.

52 Stack, Carol, All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community (New York 1974).Google Scholar

53 Rivera-Batiz, Francisco and Santiago, Carlos, Island Paradox: Puerto Rico in the 1990s (New York 1996) 1415.Google Scholar

54 Puerto Rican Planning Board, Informe Económico al Gobernador 1997 (San Juan 1998) Table 15 and 21.

55 Hernandez-Angueira, Mujeres Puertorriqueñas, 35.

56 Duany, ‘Nation on the Move’, 5–30.

57 Rivera-Batiz and Santiago, Island Paradox, 127.

59 Department of City Planning, City of New York, Puerto Rican New Yorkers in 1990 (New York 1994).

60 Colón, ‘Reestructuración industrial’, 135–188.

61 Muschkin, Clara and Sandoval, José Miguel, ‘Trabajadores complementarios en families latinas residentes en los Estados Unidos’, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Puerto Rico 1 (June 1996) 5582.Google Scholar

63 City Planning New York, Puerto Rican New Yorkers in 1990, 27.

64 Lewis, Gordon, Notes on the Puerto Rican Revolution (New York 1974).Google Scholar

65 Puerto Rican Planning Board, Informe Económico al Gobernador 1997, Table 29, A–34.

66 For a full comparison, see my book, The Myth of the Male Breadwinner.

67 Safa, The Myth of the Male Breadwinner, and from the same author: ‘Female-Headed Households’, and: ‘Women Coping with Crisis: Social Consequences of Export-Led Industrialization in the Dominican Republic’ (Agenda paper, Miami 1999) 36. (In press in revised form as ‘Questioning Globalization: Gender and Export Processing in the Dominican Republic’ in special issue edited by Cecilia Menjivar, Journal of Developing Areas (Macomb 2002.)

68 Safa, ‘Female-Headed Households’.

69 Gainesville Sun, 21 February 2001.

70 Hernandez-Angueira, Mujeres Puertorriqueñas.

71 Safa, ‘Female-Headed Households’.

72 Duarte, Isis and Tejeda, Ramón, Los Hogares Dominicanos: El Mito de la Familia Nuclear y Los Tipos de jefaturas de Hogar (Sto Domingo 1995)Google Scholar; Safa, ‘Women Coping with Crisis’.

73 See: Safa, The Myth of the Male Breadwinner, and: ‘Women Coping with Crisis’.

74 Ramirez, Rafael, Dime Capitdn: Reflexiones sobre la Masculinidad en Puerto Rico (Rio Piedras 1993)Google Scholar

75 For example, Cruz-Malave, Arnaldo, ‘What a Tangled Web: Masculinity, Abjection, and the Foundations of Puerto Rican Literature in the United States’ in: Daniel Balderston and Donna Guy, Sex and Sexuality in Latin America (New York 1997)Google Scholar, and: Manuel Guzmán, ‘Pa'la Escuelita con Mucho Cuida'o y por la Orilla: A Journey through the Contested Terrain of the Nation and Sexual Orientation’ in: Negrón-Muntaner and Grosfoguel, Puerto Rican Jam.

76 Duany, ‘Nation on the Move’, 5–30.