Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T22:26:27.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seed longevity and germination of the emerging invasive species wavyleaf basketgrass (Oplismenus undulatifolius) under varied light regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2023

Dominique H. Pham
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, USA
Carrie A. Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Carrie Wu; Email: cwu@richmond.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Invasive nonindigenous species pose a serious threat to native biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Understanding how species’ performance varies under conditions in the current and invaded range can help to predict the dynamics of the invading species in its new environment. Plants with the ability to alter growth in response to variation in light conditions may be favored in landscapes that experience frequent disturbance, as these species may be able to exploit a wide range of niches. Seedbank persistence may also play a critical role in successful plant invasion, as extended seed viability may increase the chance of outlasting unfavorable conditions, maintain population genetic diversity, and allow reinvasions. This study investigated seed longevity and the effect of light intensity on germination of wavyleaf basketgrass [Oplismenus undulatifolius (Ard.) Roem. & Schult.], a newly established invasive species in U.S. mid-Atlantic forest understories. Oplismenus undulatifolius seeds were collected across 5 yr from the original site of introduction in Maryland, USA, and stored in standard lab conditions, then subjected to germination trials under four light conditions in a controlled growth chamber. Seeds remained viable for at least 9 yr, and light intensity did not significantly impact seed germination. Our study demonstrates the importance of evaluating environmental and temporal effects on germination traits, because the scope of surveillance in the field may need to be expanded based on new information about environmental tolerance. Long-term monitoring may also be necessary to effectively control invasive plant populations capable of forming a persistent seedbank.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America

Management Implications

Oplismenus undulatifolius (wavyleaf basketgrass) is an invasive species in U.S. mid-Atlantic forest understories that has spread rapidly since its discovery in 1996 at Patapsco Valley State Park in Maryland, forming dense carpets that may crowd out native species. To better inform early-stage invasive management, we examined the seed longevity and germination of O. undulatifolius under four light intensities using seeds from five collection years that had been stored in laboratory conditions. We found that under laboratory conditions, O. undulatifolius seed viability remained high for 7 yr, and seeds could successfully germinate after 9 yr. Germination percentage did not differ across the light levels examined. This suggests land managers may need to continue monitoring for O. undulatifolius seedlings in treated areas for up to 7 yr, even after complete aboveground removal, to prevent potential reestablishment from seed. Our study demonstrates the importance of early-stage monitoring management before a persistent seedbank is established, because eradication becomes increasingly difficult when population regeneration is possible from seeds as well as vegetative propagules. Further, surveillance for new O. undulatifolius seedlings may need to be expanded beyond deep-shade areas, as we observed high germination rates across a wide range of light levels. Thus, seeds that disperse to areas of high light may still be able to germinate, though the ability to persist to reproduction in these high light conditions is less understood. We recommend additional studies on factors affecting growth and survival at later life stages of O. undulatifolius to determine its potential range of environmental tolerance and inform effective early detection and response efforts.

Introduction

Invasive species contribute markedly to global environmental change, and thus pose an increasing threat to native biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (Mainka and Howard Reference Mainka and Howard2010; Singh et al. Reference Singh, Shikha and Anamika2021; Vitousek et al. Reference Vitousek, D’Antonio, Loope and Westbrooks1996). After introduction to new environments, nonnative species may aggressively compete with native biota for resources directly through interference competition and indirectly through exploitation competition (Allstadt et al. Reference Allstadt, Caraco, Molnár and Korniss2012; Bennett et al. Reference Bennett, Thomsen and Strauss2011; Gioria and Osborne Reference Gioria and Osborne2014; Le Louarn et al. Reference Le Louarn, Couillens, Deschamps-Cottin and Clergeau2016). Invasive species can impact disturbance dynamics, including fire, erosion, and biotic disturbance regimes (Gergel and Turner Reference Gergel and Turner2017; Mack and D’Antonio Reference Mack and D’Antonio1998). Nonnative pathogens can also be transported with an introduced nonnative species, and thus impose an additional ecological stress on recipient communities (Foster et al. Reference Foster, Peeler, Bojko, Clark, Morritt, Roy, Stebbing, Tidbury, Wood and Bass2021; Smith et al. Reference Smith, Sax and Lafferty2006). Furthermore, recipient ecosystems may be susceptible to modification in nutrient cycling and physical and structural properties in response to the establishment of invasive species (Asner et al. Reference Asner, Hughes, Vitousek, Knapp, Kennedy-Bowdoin, Boardman, Martin, Eastwood and Green2008; Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Driscoll, Catford and Gibbons2020; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Li, Wu and Hu2019). As plants are foundations of ecological communities, introduced plant species may be particularly likely to critically threaten ecosystems when they establish and become invasive (Weidlich et al. Reference Weidlich, Flórido, Sorrini and Brancalion2020).

The seed stage is vital in the life history of invasive plants, as successful germination is critical for the initial establishment of new populations (Enders et al. Reference Enders, Havemann, Ruland, Bernard-Verdier, Catford, Gómez-Aparicio, Haider, Heger, Kueffer, Kühn, Meyerson, Musseau, Novoa, Ricciardi and Sagouis2020; Gioria and Pyšek Reference Gioria and Pyšek2017; Theoharides and Dukes Reference Theoharides and Dukes2007; Wainwright and Cleland Reference Wainwright and Cleland2013). Emergence timing will determine the first environmental conditions that seedlings experience, and thus abiotic cues that initiate germination will affect plant survival and establishment (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin1998; Donohue et al. Reference Donohue, Rubio de Casas, Burghardt, Kovach and Willis2010; Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger Reference Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger2006; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Willis, Burghardt, Qi, Liu, de Moura Souza-Filho, Ma and Du2014). Light quality and quantity are prominent environmental cues that many plant species with photoblastic seeds use to break enforced dormancy or stimulate germination of nondormant, quiescent seeds (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2004; Côme Reference Côme1970; Fenner and Thompson Reference Fenner and Thompson2005). How seeds respond to the light environments encountered in their introduced ranges can dramatically impact establishment success in these new locations (Donohue et al. Reference Donohue, Rubio de Casas, Burghardt, Kovach and Willis2010). For example, if coupled with a rapid growth rate, early emergence in low light conditions may provide a competitive advantage when individuals are able to overtop neighbors and increase potential light exposure (Carvalho et al. Reference Carvalho, de Andrade and de Andrade2021; Makana and Thomas Reference Makana and Thomas2005; Weinig Reference Weinig2000). The ability to germinate under a wide range of conditions may also favor invasiveness by increasing potential suitable habitat and the likelihood of establishment in novel environments (Bellache et al. Reference Bellache, Moltó, Benfekih, Torres-Pagan, Mir, Verdeguer, Boscaiu and Vicente2022; Ebrahimi and Eslami Reference Ebrahimi and Eslami2012; Hou et al. Reference Hou, Chen, Peng and Chen2014; Javaid et al. Reference Javaid, Florentine, Ali and Weller2018). Alternatively, narrow germination requirements may promote invasion success by ensuring favorable conditions for seedling establishment, such as through microhabitat selection (Carvalho et al. Reference Carvalho, de Andrade and de Andrade2021; Gioria et al. Reference Gioria, Pyšek and Osborne2018; Kudoh et al. Reference Kudoh, Nakayama, Lihová and Marhold2007; Makana and Thomas Reference Makana and Thomas2005; Marushia et al. Reference Marushia, Cadotte and Holt2010; Stromberg et al. Reference Stromberg, Lite, Marler, Paradzick, Shafroth, Shorrock, White and White2007; Wainwright et al. Reference Wainwright, Wolkovich and Cleland2012). As plants may encounter diverse environmental conditions following initial dispersal to new locations, broad light requirements for germination may strongly influence where invasive plants may be successful, whereas strict light requirements may optimize seedling establishment and growth (Bhatt et al. Reference Bhatt, Chen, Pompelli, Jamal, Mancinelli and Radicetti2023; Castillo et al. Reference Castillo, Bustamante, Pena-Gomez, Gutiérrez, Reyes, Arredondo-Núñez and Marey2013).

Seed longevity for a year or more can also be important for the successful establishment of invasive plant populations, by increasing recruitment opportunities when germination conditions are suitable (Gioria et al. Reference Gioria, Carta, Baskin, Dawson, Essl, Kreft, Pergl, Kleunen, Weigelt, Winter and Pyšek2021; Simons and Johnston Reference Simons and Johnston2006; Venable and Brown Reference Venable and Brown1988). The ability to maintain a reservoir of metabolically inactive individuals in a seedbank allows plant species to employ a bet-hedging strategy to counter suboptimal conditions and can influence the long-term evolutionary potential of populations (Gremer and Venable Reference Gremer and Venable2014; Levin Reference Levin1990). Seedbanks provide a degree of resilience to populations in highly variable or disturbed environments by temporally staggering emergence within a growing season or across multiple years (Evans and Dennehy Reference Evans and Dennehy2005; Kalisz Reference Kalisz1986; ten Brink et al. Reference ten Brink, Gremer and Kokko2020). Additionally, persistent seedbanks can facilitate population regeneration and help maintain genetic diversity within a population across generations, which may contribute to invasion success (Abbas et al. Reference Abbas, Pickart, Goldsmith, Davenport, Newby, Muñoz-Rodríguez, Grewell and Castillo2021; Gioria et al. Reference Gioria, Pyšek and Moravcová2012; Gremer and Venable Reference Gremer and Venable2014; Lennon et al. Reference Lennon, den Hollander, Wilke-Berenguer and Blath2021). Seedbanks can reduce vulnerability to local extinctions and potential negative consequences of founder effects, genetic bottlenecks, and small population sizes early in the invasion history (Houle and Phillips Reference Houle and Phillips1988; Meimberg et al. Reference Meimberg, Hammond, Jorgensen, Park, Gerlach, Rice and McKay2006; Puillandre et al. Reference Puillandre, Dupas, Dangles, Zeddam, Capdevielle-Dulac, Barbin, Torres-Leguizamon and Silvain2008; Williams and Fishman Reference Williams and Fishman2014). This stabilizing effect of seedbanks results in part from the reserve of historical genetic diversity maintained in dormant seeds, which can supplement current populations experiencing low genetic diversity (McCue and Holtsford Reference McCue and Holtsford1998; Rees Reference Rees1993). Consequently, seedbank persistence can affect demographic persistence by promoting local patch reestablishment, as well as providing a source for propagules contributing to range expansion (Abbas et al. Reference Abbas, Pickart, Goldsmith, Davenport, Newby, Muñoz-Rodríguez, Grewell and Castillo2021; Galatowitsch et al. Reference Galatowitsch, Larson and Larson2016; Leary et al. Reference Leary, Mahnken, Wada and Burnett2018).

First discovered in the United States in 1996 near Baltimore, MD (Peterson et al. Reference Peterson, Terrell, Uebel, Davis, Scholz and Soreng1999), wavyleaf basketgrass [Oplismenus undulatifolius (Ard.) P. Beauv., Poaceae] is recognized as a high-risk invasive species by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (DCR 2022; USDA 2012). This perennial rhizomatous grass forms dense carpets in the forest understory that may crowd out native herbaceous plants and inhibit the regeneration of native hardwood trees (Beauchamp and Koontz Reference Beauchamp and Koontz2013; Bowen et al. Reference Bowen, Beauchamp and Stevens2020). Seeds may also be an important form of long-distance dispersal for O. undulatifolius to colonize new habitats. Flowering spikelets with long awns produce an extremely sticky substance that strongly adheres to animals and other objects that brush past the inflorescence, allowing seeds to be transported over long distances (Beauchamp and Koontz Reference Beauchamp and Koontz2013).

Oplismenus undulatifolius continues to spread across the U.S. mid-Atlantic region and has been reported in seven states as well as the District of Columbia (EDDMapS 2023; DCR 2022). Patches of O. undulatifolius appear restricted to shady conditions that are characteristic of other congeneric species (Charles-Dominique et al. Reference Charles-Dominique, Midgley, Tomlinson and Bond2018; Middelton Reference Middelton1998; Scholz Reference Scholz1981; Srivastava and Shukla Reference Srivastava and Shukla2016; Xu et al. Reference Xu, Zhao, Yan, Peng, Zhang, Zhang, Han, Wang, Chang and Xu2023). As such, light availability may be a factor limiting the spread and distribution of O. undulatifolius within its invasive range (Beauchamp and Koontz Reference Beauchamp and Koontz2013). However, how large a role photoinhibition has on invasion success, as well as at what life stage light has a critical influence on the performance of O. undulatifolius, remains unexplored. In this study, we focused on performance at the earliest life stage of O. undulatifolius, as successful germination is a necessary requirement for subsequent population establishment. Specifically, we (1) characterized the capacity of O. undulatifolius seeds to germinate under a range of light levels characteristic of those found in U.S. mid-Atlantic forest understories and (2) evaluated how seed viability changed with seed age.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Conditions

To investigate the effect of light intensity on O. undulatifolius germination, we established a range of light levels in a TC2 walk-in growth room (Environmental Growth Chambers, Chagrin Falls, OH) under long-day conditions (16-h light at 22 C/8-h dark at 18 C) and 50% relative humidity. Four photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD; µmol m−2 s−1) levels were created (Table 1) by increasing the number of overlapping shade cloth layers (Gemplers, Janesville, WI) suspended by PVC pipe structures constructed within the shelving system of the growth room, such that the top and all four sides of each shelf were enclosed with the shade cloth. PPFD was measured using a Li-Cor LI-250A light meter, LI-190R quantum sensor, and 2003S mounting and leveling fixture (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE). We conducted field surveys of light intensity in June 2021 to determine how these experimental light levels in the growth room compared with conditions in the field (Table 1). Light intensity was sampled at three sites in Virginia (Piney Grove Preserve, n = 15; Powhatan State Park, n = 8; and Lake Anna State Park, n = 2) in established O. undulatifolius populations (EDDMapS 2023; DCR 2022). Our two lowest light levels in the growth room were consistent with those found in the field (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests, F(6, 57) = 746.217, P < 0.0001 for light treatment, P > 0.05 for three field sites and two lowest light treatments; Table 1).

Table 1. Comparison of light intensity (mean ± SE) in the growth room experimental conditions and representative field locations where Oplismenus undulatifolius is established.

a Values are PPFD (µmol m−2 s−1) measured with a Li-Cor LI-250A photometer. Means followed by distinct letters are significantly different (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests, F(6, 57) = 746.217, P < 0.0001).

b Growth room shade treatments were established by increasing the number of overlaid shade cloth layers (n = 9–12 measurements in each shade treatment).

c Light measurements at three sites in Virginia where O. undulatifolius occurs: Piney Grove Preserve (PINE; 36.98932°N, 77.04135°W; n = 15); Powhatan State Park (POWH; 37.68427°N, 77.91688°W; n = 8); and Lake Anna State Park (ANNA; 38.111°N, 77.831°W; n = 2).

Seed Source

We germinated seeds from five collection years under four light levels to determine whether seed viability varied with age or light conditions. Oplismenus undulatifolius seeds were collected by Vanessa Beauchamp (Towson University, Towson, MD) from the Woodstock region of Patapsco Valley State Park, MD (39.333222°N, 76.782965°W) in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, and 2020. We used seeds from this location, because it is the site of first identification (Peterson et al. Reference Peterson, Terrell, Uebel, Davis, Scholz and Soreng1999) and thus may have the most potential for genetic and phenotypic variability. Preliminary studies suggest somewhat greater allelic diversity and heterozygosity in this population than in two more recently established locations (Wu et al. Reference Wu, Hakkenberg and Beauchamp2018), but how this compares with populations in the native range is currently unknown. Seeds were stored in paper bags at room temperature and ambient humidity after collection, and seed glumes were removed before the experiment.

Germination Assays

In summer 2021, seeds were sown on 9-cm-diameter petri dishes containing 20 ml (0.008 g ml−1) sterilized phytoblend agar (Caisson Laboratories, North Logan, UT) in a laminar flow hood to reduce surface contamination. Petri dishes were sealed with 3M Micropore Surgical Tape (Nexcare, 3M Health Care, St Paul, MN) to minimize moisture loss while allowing gas exchange. Within a given light level, three replicate petri dishes were established for each collection year. Each petri dish contained 15 seeds from a single collection year, arrayed in a three by five grid pattern. In total, each of the four light levels contained 15 petri dishes (five collection years with three replicates per year).

Seed germination was recorded as the first day of radicle or shoot protrusion and monitored daily for 25 d. When germinants were counted, petri dishes were kept within the shade structures to prevent potential exposure to ambient light from the growth chamber, as short-duration light exposure can stimulate germination in some species (Milberg et al. Reference Milberg, Andersson and Noronha1996). Photometer measurements confirmed that accessing petri dishes within the shade structures this way did not expose seeds to detectable changes in light. Total germination was measured as the percent of seeds that successfully germinated for each petri dish. To test for effects of light level and collection year on total percentage of germination, a two-way ANOVA was performed using jamovi software for Windows (jamovi project 2021), after confirming that the data met model assumptions.

Results and Discussion

The capability to germinate under a range of light levels and after years of dormancy may enable invasive plants to persist in a wide range of environmental conditions and aid expansion beyond native niche limits. In this study, we germinated O. undulatifolius seeds of five ages under four light levels, using overlapping shade cloth layers to manipulate light intensity. We found similar rates of germination regardless of collection year or light level, with 99% of all seeds that eventually germinated doing so by 15 d after plating (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Germination patterns of Oplismenus undulatifolius seeds collected in different years (indicated by color) under four light levels for 25 d. Lines indicate total percentage of seeds germinated across three replicate plates for each collection year × light level combination. Light levels: , 0 shade layers; , 1 shade layer; , 2 shade layers; , 3 shade layers.

We found no significant effect of light level (two-way ANOVA, F(3, 40) = 0.628, P > 0.05) or interaction with seed age (F(4, 40) =0.989, P > 0.05; Figure 2; Table 2) on total germination percentage after 25 d, indicating that O. undulatifolius seeds may be light indifferent, at least in terms of the light intensities or quantities used in our study. This was somewhat unexpected based on characterization of Oplismenus as a shade-tolerant genus (Charles-Dominique et al. Reference Charles-Dominique, Midgley, Tomlinson and Bond2018; Middelton Reference Middelton1998; Srivastava and Shukla Reference Srivastava and Shukla2016). While our experimental low light levels (Table 1) simulated field conditions, the two high light levels (160.83 and 39.63 µmol m−2 s−1) were much brighter than typical conditions we measured at locations within Virginia forest understories where O. undulatifolius is currently found. However, these brighter conditions may be more typical of light conditions that seeds could encounter in light gaps or forest edges near established patches. Thus, O. undulatifolius may be physiologically capable of at least initially colonizing a wider range of light environments than predicted based on observed patch distributions, but does not persist in those locations due to poor competitive ability in those open habitats (Grime Reference Grime1977; Kepner and Beauchamp Reference Kepner and Beauchamp2020; Liancourt et al. Reference Liancourt, Callaway and Michalet2005). Future studies on the effect of different light conditions on subsequent life stages are imperative to predict its potential geographic distribution in the invaded range for effective monitoring and management (Cheplick Reference Cheplick2005; Qi et al. Reference Qi, Dai, Miao, Zhai, Si, Huang, Wang and Du2014; Svriz et al. Reference Svriz, Damascos, Lediuk, Varela and Barthélémy2014; Warren et al. Reference Warren, Wright and Bradford2011).

Figure 2. Comparison of total average percent germination in Oplismenus undulatifolius seeds collected across years. Means (± SE) of percent germinated for all seeds per collection year, pooled across light treatment levels. Bars with unique letters are significantly different from one another (P < 0.05). n = 12 replicate plates per collection year.

Table 2. Two-way ANOVA for effects of light level and seed age on Oplismenus undulatifolius seed germination after 25 d under controlled growth room conditions.

* Significant treatment effect: P < 0.05.

SS = Sum of squares, MS = Mean squares.

We expected to see negative photoblastism in O. undulatifolius seeds, based on predictions that light availability restricts the distribution of this species (Beauchamp and Koontz Reference Beauchamp and Koontz2013). However, our finding that germination percentage did not differ across the four light levels is not unusual among photoblastism studies with invasive plants (Ebrahimi and Eslami Reference Ebrahimi and Eslami2012; Greenberg et al. Reference Greenberg, Smith and Levey2001; Tinoco-Ojanguren et al. Reference Tinoco-Ojanguren, Reyes-Ortega, Sánchez-Coronado, Molina-Freaner and Orozco-Segovia2016). For example, light intensity did not affect the proportion or timing of germination in the invasive vine Oriental bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculatus Thunb.), although seedlings could also establish in dense shade and grow rapidly when exposed to high light conditions (Greenberg et al. Reference Greenberg, Smith and Levey2001). Indeed, numerous introduced plant studies identified positive photoblastic seeds that exhibit an increase in germination when exposed to high light conditions, which may enhance performance in disturbed areas (Bittencourt et al. Reference Bittencourt, Bonome, Trezzi, Vidal and Lana2017; Cervera and Parra-Tabla Reference Cervera and Parra-Tabla2009; Lamsal et al. Reference Lamsal, Devkota, Shrestha, Joshi and Shrestha2019; Leal et al. Reference Leal, Meiado, Lopes and Leal2013; Mwendwa et al. Reference Mwendwa, Kilawe and Treydte2020; Qi et al. Reference Qi, Dai, Miao, Zhai, Si, Huang, Wang and Du2014). However, germination requirements and shade tolerance at later life stages may be uncoupled (Figueroa and Lusk Reference Figueroa and Lusk2001). As such, additional studies are warranted to understand whether the observed germination indifference to light intensity is more broadly characteristic of invasive shade-tolerant grasses like O. undulatifolius.

Seeds may respond differently to various aspects of light environments (Lindig-Cisneros and Zedler Reference Lindig-Cisneros and Zedler2001; Veldman and Putz Reference Veldman and Putz2010). For example, invasive canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) seeds displayed positive photoblastism to light quality (photon irradiance: white and red light) and quantity (no germination in the absence of light) but were light indifferent to photoperiod (Lindig-Cisneros and Zedler Reference Lindig-Cisneros and Zedler2001). Thus, while our results suggest O. undulatifolius may be insensitive to light quantity across our experimental light levels, other attributes of light known to promote germination in some species, such as absorption of red light or photoperiod regimes, could be more important cues to break dormancy or release nondormant seeds from quiescence (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin1998; Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2004; Bhatt et al. Reference Bhatt, Batista-Silva, Gallacher and Pompelli2020; Han et al. Reference Han, Li, Wang and Shi2022; Mathews Reference Mathews2006). Likewise, other abiotic factors known to influence germination, such as temperature and salinity, may also act as potential environmental filters constraining the establishment of O. undulatifolius in the invaded range at the seed stage (Bangle et al. Reference Bangle, Walker and Powell2008; El-Keblawy and Al-Rawai Reference El-Keblawy and Al-Rawai2005; Ottavini et al. Reference Ottavini, Pannacci, Onofri, Tei and Kryger Jensen2019; Tinoco-Ojanguren et al. Reference Tinoco-Ojanguren, Reyes-Ortega, Sánchez-Coronado, Molina-Freaner and Orozco-Segovia2016).

Introduced species are often exposed to novel climatic conditions in their new ranges or released from competitive biotic constraints encountered in their native ranges. Rapid evolutionary change in response to these new local conditions may facilitate expansion of introduced species beyond conditions characteristic of their native range, particularly when population differentiation follows climatic gradients in the introduced range (Blossey et al. Reference Blossey, Nuzzo and Dávalos2017; Quiroga et al. Reference Quiroga, Premoli and Fernández2018; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Chen, Liu, Song, Liu, Zou, Qian, Zhu and Cui2022). Indeed, recent studies have found evidence of population differentiation in seed germination requirements of invasive Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] (Fletcher et al. Reference Fletcher, Varnon and Barney2020) and garlic mustard [Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavare & Grandel] that suggests adaptive shifts in the germination niche that maximizes germination across the invaded North American ranges. Similarly, the realized niche of O. undulatifolius may be expanding in North America to include sunlit environments previously thought to be unsuitable based on distribution in its native range. Although light conditions in the field can vary within a single day, this study demonstrates that O. undulatifolius has the capacity to germinate in continuous shade as well as under extended exposure to high light intensity. Hence, our results suggest O. undulatifolius may also be able to successfully germinate in the field under much brighter conditions than forest understories typical of where it has already been detected in the U.S. mid-Atlantic. Additional studies are needed with seeds sourced from populations spanning the current geographic range, as well as from different microsites (e.g., deep forest understory vs. peripheral patches at forest edges) to test for adaptive changes in germination response to light environment across the invaded range.

We found that some seeds from all collection years successfully germinated under each light level, albeit with varying levels of success (Figure 1). Although total germination differed across collection years, that is, with seed age, at least one seed from each collection year showed successful protrusion of a radicle or shoot. Thus, O. undulatifolius seeds are capable of remaining viable for at least 9 yr after storage in standard laboratory conditions. We also found a significant effect of collection year on total germination percentage (two-way ANOVA, F(4, 40) = 293.014, P < 0.001; Figure 2; Table 2), with germination percentage of seeds collected from 2011 and 2012 significantly lower than that of the younger seeds (Tukey’s HSD post hoc test, P < 0.001; Figure 2). While the decrease in seed germination in these two seed age groups could be an artifact of maternal effects, temperature and precipitation in 2011 and 2012 were not notably different from the other collection years in the geographic region from which these seeds were sourced (Supplementary Table S1). Similarly, seed storage conditions are unlikely to have influenced relative differences in germination percent across collection years, as all seeds were collected and stored under comparable conditions. These results suggest a potential for high seed viability in O. undulatifolius for approximately 7 yr, at least under laboratory storage conditions.

Seed longevity has been found to vary widely across invasive plants (Redwood et al. Reference Redwood, Matlack and Huebner2018; Schoeman et al. Reference Schoeman, Buckley, Cherry, Long and Steadman2010; Wijayratne and Pyke Reference Wijayratne and Pyke2012). While a recent study found seed viability in A. petiolata to persist for at least 13 yr in some populations (Blossey et al. Reference Blossey, Nuzzo and Dávalos2017), the extended seed viability we observed in O. undulatifolius is particularly notable among invasive grasses, many of which show only short-term persistence or transient seedbanks (Humphries and Florentine Reference Humphries and Florentine2022; Martins Reference Martins2006; Redwood et al. Reference Redwood, Matlack and Huebner2018; Williams et al. Reference Williams, Kristiansen, Sindel, Wilson and Shaw2016). Certainly, our seed storage conditions undoubtably influenced seed longevity estimates. Laboratory storage is generally more benign compared with soil conditions, where seeds are exposed to complex interacting factors and stochastic events such as risk of predation, infection, and intolerable environmental conditions (Dantas-Junior et al. Reference Dantas-Junior, Musso and Miranda2018; Long et al. Reference Long, Gorecki, Renton, Scott, Colville, Goggin, Commander, Westcott, Cherry and Finch-Savage2015; Redwood et al. Reference Redwood, Matlack and Huebner2018; Wijayratne and Pyke Reference Wijayratne and Pyke2012). Even under laboratory settings, loss of viability generally occurs more rapidly under room temperature conditions (as used in this study) than refrigeration (Solberg et al. Reference Solberg, Yndgaard, Andreasen, von Bothmer, Loskutov and Asdal2020). However, many members of the Poaceae exhibit relatively short-term viability across different laboratory storage strategies (Solberg et al. Reference Solberg, Yndgaard, Andreasen, von Bothmer, Loskutov and Asdal2020), so our observed 7-yr seed viability of O. undulatifolius is indeed notable. Additionally, other longevity studies (Bangle et al. Reference Bangle, Walker and Powell2008; Blossey et al. Reference Blossey, Nuzzo and Dávalos2017; Humphries and Florentine Reference Humphries and Florentine2022; Solberg et al. Reference Solberg, Yndgaard, Andreasen, von Bothmer, Loskutov and Asdal2020) also use seed storage at room temperature, and thus provide reasonable comparisons for the observed seed longevity in O. undulatifolius. While storage under laboratory conditions may not simulate the full environmental complexity seeds experience in the field, it still provides a useful first assessment of seed longevity. It would be interesting to explore whether this lengthy seed viability in O. undulatifolius persists under field conditions. Nevertheless, long-term monitoring and management of O. undulatifolius–infested sites may be warranted for up to 7 yr or more, when the potential for successful germination remains high.

Based on the long duration of seed viability under laboratory conditions, we encourage land and natural resource managers to continue long-term control and monitoring efforts for O. undulatifolius even after aboveground removal to detect and treat subsequent seedlings. Furthermore, the observed indifference of O. undulatifolius germination to light intensity in this study has important management implications. Because light level does not appear to be a major constraint on germination, seedling establishment and range expansion may be promoted outside previously expected environmental conditions. Understanding seed responses to environmental conditions, as well as the capacity for long-term dormancy, is necessary when forecasting performance of invasive species that are colonizing new habitats. Considering the capability of O. undulatifolius to spread by seed (Beauchamp and Koontz Reference Beauchamp and Koontz2013), studies on this life stage are essential to make effective management decisions and predict areas that are at high invasion risk.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2023.27

Acknowledgments

We thank Vanessa Beauchamp (Towson University) for the seeds used in this study, Kevin Heffernan (Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation) for help in the field, and Kerry O’Neill (Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation) for site access. This research was supported by the University of Richmond. No conflicts of interest have been declared.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Elizabeth LaRue, The University of Texas at El Paso

References

Abbas, AM, Pickart, AJ, Goldsmith, LM, Davenport, DN, Newby, B, Muñoz-Rodríguez, AF, Grewell, BJ, Castillo, JM (2021) Seed bank persistence of a South American cordgrass in invaded Northern Atlantic and Pacific Coast estuaries. AoB Plants 13, 10.1093/aobpla/plab014 10.1093/aobpla/plab014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allstadt, A, Caraco, T, Molnár, F, Korniss, G (2012) Interference competition and invasion: spatial structure, novel weapons and resistance zones. J Theor Biol 306:4660 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.04.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asner, GP, Hughes, RF, Vitousek, PM, Knapp, DE, Kennedy-Bowdoin, T, Boardman, J, Martin, RE, Eastwood, M, Green, RO (2008) Invasive plants transform the three-dimensional structure of rain forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:45194523 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bangle, DN, Walker, LR, Powell, EA (2008) Seed germination of the invasive plant Brassica tournefortii (Sahara mustard) in the Mojave Desert. West N Am Nat 68:334342 10.3398/1527-0904(2008)68[334:SGOTIP]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM (1998) Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. San Diego: Academic Press. Pp 87100 10.1016/B978-012080260-9/50005-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, JM, Baskin, CC (2004) A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Sci Res 14:116 10.1079/SSR2003150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, VB, Koontz, SM (2013) An introduction to Oplismenus undulatifolius (Ard.) Roem. & Schult. (wavyleaf basketgrass), a recent invader in mid-Atlantic forest understories. J Torrey Bot Soc 140:391413 10.3159/TORREY-D-13-00033.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellache, M, Moltó, N, Benfekih, LA, Torres-Pagan, N, Mir, R, Verdeguer, M, Boscaiu, M, Vicente, O (2022) Physiological and biochemical responses to water stress and salinity of the invasive moth plant, Araujia sericifera Brot., during seed germination and vegetative growth. Agron 12:361 10.3390/agronomy12020361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, AE, Thomsen, M, Strauss, SY (2011) Multiple mechanisms enable invasive species to suppress native species. Am J Bot 98:10861094 10.3732/ajb.1000177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatt, A, Batista-Silva, W, Gallacher, DJ, Pompelli, MF (2020) Germination of Cenchrus ciliaris, Pennisetum divisum, and Panicum turgidum is seasonally dependent. Can J Bot 98:449458 10.1139/cjb-2019-0194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, A, Chen, X, Pompelli, MF, Jamal, A, Mancinelli, R, Radicetti, E (2023) Characterization of invasiveness, thermotolerance and light requirement of nine invasive species in China. Plants 12:1192 10.3390/plants12051192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittencourt, HVH, Bonome, LTS, Trezzi, MM, Vidal, RA, Lana, MA (2017) Seed germination ecology of Eragrostis plana, an invasive weed of South American pasture lands. S Afr J Bot 109:246252 10.1016/j.sajb.2017.01.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blossey, B, Nuzzo, V, Dávalos, A (2017) Climate and rapid local adaptation as drivers of germination and seed bank dynamics of Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) in North America. J Ecol 105:14851495 10.1111/1365-2745.12854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, AKM, Beauchamp, VB, Stevens, MHH (2020) Evaluating the efficacy of removal treatments on wavyleaf basketgrass (Oplismenus undulatifolius). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 13:176188 10.1017/inp.2020.22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, ASR, de Andrade, LG, de Andrade, ACS (2021) Germination of small tropical seeds has distinct light quality and temperature requirements, depending on microhabitat. Plant Biol 23:981991 10.1111/plb.13328CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castillo, ML, Bustamante, RO, Pena-Gomez, FT, Gutiérrez, VL, Reyes, CA, Arredondo-Núñez, A, Marey, M (2013) Negative photoblastism in the invasive species Eschscholzia californica Cham.(Papaveraceae): patterns of altitudinal variation in native and invasive range. Gayana Bot 70:330336 10.4067/S0717-66432013000200010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervera, JC, Parra-Tabla, V (2009) Seed germination and seedling survival traits of invasive and non-invasive congeneric Ruellia species (Acanthaceae) in Yucatan, Mexico. Plant Ecol 205:285293 10.1007/s11258-009-9617-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles-Dominique, T, Midgley, GF, Tomlinson, KW, Bond, WJ (2018) Steal the light: shade vs fire adapted vegetation in forest–savanna mosaics. New Phytol 218:14191429 10.1111/nph.15117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheplick, GP (2005) Biomass partitioning and reproductive allocation in the invasive, cleistogamous grass Microstegium vimineum: influence of the light environment. J Torrey Bot Soc 132:214224 10.3159/1095-5674(2005)132[214:BPARAI]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côme, D (1970) Les obstacles à la germination. Collection monographies de physiologie végétale 6. Paris: Masson et cie. 162 pGoogle Scholar
Dantas-Junior, AB, Musso, C, Miranda, HS (2018) Seed longevity and seedling emergence rate of Urochloa decumbens as influenced by sowing depth in a Cerrado soil. Grass Forage Sci 73:811814 10.1111/gfs.12347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[DCR] Department of Conservation and Recreation (2022) Invasive Plant Alert: Wavyleaf Grass (Oplismenus hirtellus ssp. undulatifolius). Richmond: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage Google Scholar
Donohue, K, Rubio de Casas, R, Burghardt, L, Kovach, K, Willis, CG (2010) Germination, postgermination adaptation, and species ecological ranges. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:293319 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrahimi, E, Eslami, SV (2012) Effect of environmental factors on seed germination and seedling emergence of invasive Ceratocarpus arenarius . Weed Res 52:5059 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00896.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
EDDMapS (2023) Early Detection and Distribution Mapping System, Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, University of Georgia. http://www.eddmaps.org/distribution/viewmap.cfm?sub=79593. Accessed: May 17, 2023Google Scholar
El-Keblawy, A, Al-Rawai, A (2005) Effects of salinity, temperature, and light on germination of invasive Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) D.C. J Arid Environ 61:555565 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, M, Havemann, F, Ruland, F, Bernard-Verdier, M, Catford, JA, Gómez-Aparicio, L, Haider, S, Heger, T, Kueffer, C, Kühn, I, Meyerson, LA, Musseau, C, Novoa, A, Ricciardi, A, Sagouis, A, et al. (2020) A conceptual map of invasion biology: integrating hypotheses into a consensus network. Global Ecol Biogeogr 29:978991 10.1111/geb.13082CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, MEK, Dennehy, JJ (2005) Germ banking: bet-hedging and variable release from egg and seed dormancy. Q Rev Biol 80:431451 10.1086/498282CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, M, Thompson, K (2005) The Ecology of Seeds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp 97109 10.1017/CBO9780511614101.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueroa, JA, Lusk, CH (2001) Germination requirements and seedling shade tolerance are not correlated in a Chilean temperate rain forest. New Phytol 152:483489 10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00282.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finch-Savage, WE, Leubner-Metzger, G (2006) Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol 171:501523 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01787.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, RA, Varnon, KM, Barney, JN (2020) Climate drives differences in the germination niche of a globally distributed invasive grass. J Plant Ecol 13:195203 10.1093/jpe/rtz062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, R, Peeler, E, Bojko, J, Clark, PF, Morritt, D, Roy, HE, Stebbing, P, Tidbury, HJ, Wood, LE, Bass, D (2021) Pathogens co-transported with invasive non-native aquatic species: implications for risk analysis and legislation. NeoBiota 69:79102 10.3897/neobiota..71358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galatowitsch, SM, Larson, DL, Larson, JL (2016) Factors affecting post-control reinvasion by seed of an invasive species, Phragmites australis, in the Central Platte River, Nebraska. Biol Invasions 18:25052516 10.1007/s10530-015-1048-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergel, SE, Turner, MG (2017) Learning Landscape Ecology: A Practical Guide to Concepts and Techniques. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. 316 p10.1007/978-1-4939-6374-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioria, M, Carta, A, Baskin, CC, Dawson, W, Essl, F, Kreft, H, Pergl, J, Kleunen, M, Weigelt, P, Winter, M, Pyšek, P (2021) Persistent soil seed banks promote naturalisation and invasiveness in flowering plants. Ecol Lett 24:16551667 10.1111/ele.13783CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gioria, M, Osborne, BA (2014) Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs. Front Plant Sci 5, 10.3389/fpls.2014.00501 10.3389/fpls.2014.00501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gioria, M, Pyšek, P (2017) Early bird catches the worm: germination as a critical step in plant invasion. Biol Invasions 19:10551080 10.1007/s10530-016-1349-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioria, M, Pyšek, P, Moravcová, L (2012) Soil seed banks in plant invasions: promoting species invasiveness and long-term impact on plant community dynamics. Preslia 84:327350 Google Scholar
Gioria, M, Pyšek, P, Osborne, BA (2018) Timing is everything: does early and late germination favor invasions by herbaceous alien plants? J Plant Ecol 11:416 Google Scholar
Greenberg, CH, Smith, LM, Levey, DJ (2001) Fruit fate, seed germination and growth of an invasive vine—an experimental test of “sit and wait” strategy. Biol Invasions 3:363372 10.1023/A:1015857721486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gremer, JR, Venable, DL (2014) Bet hedging in desert winter annual plants: optimal germination strategies in a variable environment. Ecol Lett 17:380387 10.1111/ele.12241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:11691194 10.1086/283244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, H, Li, X, Wang, T, Shi, F (2022) Study on environmental conditions of seed germination and seedling growth of invasive plant Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson. Pol J Environ Stud 31:681690 Google Scholar
Hou, QQ, Chen, BM, Peng, SL, Chen, LY (2014) Effects of extreme temperature on seedling establishment of nonnative invasive plant. Biol Invasions 16:20492061 10.1007/s10530-014-0647-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houle, G, Phillips, DL (1988) The soil seed bank of granite outcrop plant communities. Oikos 52:8793 10.2307/3565986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, T, Florentine, S (2022) Assessing seedbank longevity and seed persistence of the invasive tussock grass Nassella trichotoma using in-field burial and laboratory-controlled ageing. Plants 11:2377 10.3390/plants11182377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
jamovi project (2021) jamovi. Version 1.2.27. https://www.jamovi.org. Accessed: June 29, 2021Google Scholar
Javaid, MM, Florentine, S, Ali, HH, Weller, S (2018) Effect of environmental factors on the germination and emergence of Salvia verbenaca L. cultivars (verbenaca and vernalis): an invasive species in semi-arid and arid rangeland regions. PLoS ONE 13:e0194319 10.1371/journal.pone.0194319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, DP, Driscoll, DA, Catford, JA, Gibbons, P (2020) Fine-scale variables associated with the presence of native forbs in natural temperate grassland. Austral Ecol 45:366375 10.1111/aec.12866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalisz, S (1986) Variable selection on the timing of germination in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 40:479491 10.2307/2408571CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kepner, C, Beauchamp, VB (2020) Interspecific competitive potential of wavyleaf basketgrass (Oplismenus undulatifolius), a recent introduction to the mid-Atlantic United States. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 13:2329 10.1017/inp.2020.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudoh, H, Nakayama, M, Lihová, J, Marhold, K (2007) Does invasion involve alternation of germination requirements? A comparative study between native and introduced strains of an annual Brassicaceae, Cardamine hirsuta . Ecol Res 22:869875 10.1007/s11284-007-0417-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamsal, A, Devkota, MP, Shrestha, DS, Joshi, S, Shrestha, A (2019) Seed germination ecology of Ageratum houstonianum: a major invasive weed in Nepal. PLoS ONE 14:e0225430 10.1371/journal.pone.0225430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Louarn, M, Couillens, B, Deschamps-Cottin, M, Clergeau, P (2016) Interference competition between an invasive parakeet and native bird species at feeding sites. J Ethol 34:291298 10.1007/s10164-016-0474-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leal, LC, Meiado, MV, Lopes, AV, Leal, IR (2013) Germination responses of the invasive Calotropis procera (ait.) R. Br. (Apocynaceae): comparisons with seeds from two ecosystems in northeastern Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc 85:10251034 10.1590/S0001-37652013000300013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leary, J, Mahnken, B, Wada, C, Burnett, K (2018) Interpreting life-history traits of miconia (Miconia calvescens) through management over space and time in the east Maui watershed, Hawaii (USA). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 11:191200 10.1017/inp.2018.26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennon, JT, den Hollander, F, Wilke-Berenguer, M, Blath, J (2021) Principles of seed banks and the emergence of complexity from dormancy. Nat Commun 12:4807 10.1038/s41467-021-24733-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, DA (1990) The seed bank as a source of genetic novelty in plants. Am Nat 135:563572 10.1086/285062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liancourt, P, Callaway, RM, Michalet, R (2005) Stress tolerance and competitive-response ability determine the outcome of biotic interactions. Ecology 86:16111618 10.1890/04-1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindig-Cisneros, R, Zedler, J (2001) Effect of light on seed germination in Phalaris arundinacea L. (reed canary grass). Plant Ecol 155:7578 10.1023/A:1013224514980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, RL, Gorecki, MJ, Renton, M, Scott, JK, Colville, L, Goggin, DE, Commander, LE, Westcott, DA, Cherry, H, Finch-Savage, WE (2015) The ecophysiology of seed persistence: a mechanistic view of the journey to germination or demise. Biol Rev 90:3159 10.1111/brv.12095CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mack, MC, D’Antonio, CM (1998) Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol Evol 13:195198 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01286-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mainka, SA, Howard, GW (2010) Climate change and invasive species: double jeopardy. Integr Zool 5:102111 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00193.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makana, JR, Thomas, SC (2005) Effects of light gaps and litter removal on the seedling performance of six African timber species. Biotropica 37:227237 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00030.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, C (2006) Caracterização e manejo da gramínea Melinis ninutiflora P. Beauv. (Capim-Gordura): uma espécie invasora do Cerrado. Ph.D. dissertation. Brasília, Brazil: Universidade de Brasília. 145 pGoogle Scholar
Marushia, RG, Cadotte, MW, Holt, JS (2010) Phenology as a basis for management of exotic annual plants in desert invasions. J Appl Ecol 47:12901299 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01881.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, S (2006) Phytochrome-mediated development in land plants: red light sensing evolves to meet the challenges of changing light environments. Mol Ecol 15:34833503 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03051.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCue, KA, Holtsford, TP (1998) Seed bank influences on genetic diversity in the rare annual Clarkia springvillensis (Onagraceae). Am J Bot 85:3036 10.2307/2446551CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meimberg, H, Hammond, JI, Jorgensen, CM, Park, TW, Gerlach, JD, Rice, KJ, McKay, JK (2006) Molecular evidence for an extreme genetic bottleneck during introduction of an invading grass to California. Biol Invasions 8:13551366 10.1007/s10530-005-2463-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middelton, L (1998) Shade-Tolerant Flowering Plants in the Southern African Flora: Morphology, Adaptions, and Horticultural Application. Ph.D dissertation. Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa: University of Pretoria. 169 pGoogle Scholar
Milberg, P, Andersson, L, Noronha, A (1996) Seed germination after short-duration light exposure: implications for the photo-control of weeds. J Appl Ecol 33:14691478 10.2307/2404785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwendwa, BA, Kilawe, CJ, Treydte, AC (2020) Effect of seasonality and light levels on seed germination of the invasive tree Maesopsis eminii in Amani Nature Forest Reserve, Tanzania. Global Ecol Conserv 21:e00807 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottavini, D, Pannacci, E, Onofri, A, Tei, F, Kryger Jensen, P (2019) Effects of light, temperature, and soil depth on the germination and emergence of Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. Agronomy 9:533 10.3390/agronomy9090533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, PM, Terrell, EE, Uebel, EC, Davis, CA, Scholz, H, Soreng, RJ (1999) Oplismenus hirtellus subspecies undulatifolius, a new record for North America. Castañea 64:201202 Google Scholar
Puillandre, N, Dupas, S, Dangles, O, Zeddam, JL, Capdevielle-Dulac, C, Barbin, K, Torres-Leguizamon, M, Silvain, JF (2008) Genetic bottleneck in invasive species: the potato tuber moth adds to the list. Biol Invasions 10:319333 10.1007/s10530-007-9132-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, SS, Dai, ZC, Miao, SL, Zhai, DL, Si, CC, Huang, P, Wang, RP, Du, DL (2014) Light limitation and litter of an invasive clonal plant, Wedelia trilobata, inhibit its seedling recruitment. Ann Bot 114:425433 10.1093/aob/mcu075CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quiroga, RE, Premoli, AC, Fernández, RJ (2018) Climatic niche shift in the amphitropical disjunct grass Trichloris crinita . PLoS ONE 13:e0199811 10.1371/journal.pone.0199811CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redwood, ME, Matlack, GR, Huebner, CD (2018) Seed longevity and dormancy state suggest management strategies for garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) and Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) in deciduous forest sites. Weed Sci 66:190198 10.1017/wsc.2017.74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, M (1993) Trade-offs among dispersal strategies in British plants. Nature 366:150152 10.1038/366150a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeman, J, Buckley, YM, Cherry, H, Long, RL, Steadman, KJ (2010) Inter-population variation in seed longevity for two invasive weeds: Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. monilifera (boneseed) and ssp. rotundata (bitou bush). Weed Res 50:6775 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00753.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, U (1981) Monographie der Gattung Oplismenus (Gramineae). Vaduz: J. Cramer. 213 pGoogle Scholar
Simons, AM, Johnston, MO (2006) Environmental and genetic sources of diversification in the timing of seed germination: implications for the evolution of bet hedging. Evolution 60:22802292 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01865.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, V, Shikha, S, Anamika, S (2021) The principal factors responsible for biodiversity loss. Open J Plant Sci 6:011014 Google Scholar
Smith, KF, Sax, DF, Lafferty, KD (2006) Evidence for the role of infectious disease in species extinction and endangerment. Conserv Biol 20:13491357 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00524.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solberg, , Yndgaard, F, Andreasen, C, von Bothmer, R, Loskutov, IG, Asdal, Å (2020) Long-term storage and longevity of orthodox seeds: a systematic review. Front Plant Sci 11, 10.3389/fpls.2020.01007 10.3389/fpls.2020.01007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srivastava, S, Shukla, RP (2016) Species composition and diversity pattern in various grassland communities with respect to different disturbance and light regimes. Biol Forum Int J 8:435446 Google Scholar
Stromberg, JC, Lite, SJ, Marler, R, Paradzick, C, Shafroth, PB, Shorrock, D, White, JM, White, MS (2007) Altered stream-flow regimes and invasive plant species: the Tamarix case. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:381393 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00297.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svriz, M, Damascos, MA, Lediuk, KD, Varela, SA, Barthélémy, D (2014) Effect of light on the growth and photosynthesis of an invasive shrub in its native range. AoB Plants 6:plu033 10.1093/aobpla/plu033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ten Brink, H, Gremer, JR, Kokko, H (2020) Optimal germination timing in unpredictable environments: the importance of dormancy for both among- and within-season variation. Ecol Lett 23:620630 10.1111/ele.13461CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theoharides, KA, Dukes, JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176:256273 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02207.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinoco-Ojanguren, C, Reyes-Ortega, I, Sánchez-Coronado, ME, Molina-Freaner, F, Orozco-Segovia, A (2016) Germination of an invasive Cenchrus ciliaris L. (buffel grass) population of the Sonoran Desert under various environmental conditions. S Afr J Bot 104:112117 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.10.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture (2012) Weed Risk Assessment for Oplismenus hirtellus (L.) Beauv. subsp. undulatifolius (Ard.) U. Scholz (Poaceae)—Wavyleaf Basketgrass. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. 15 pGoogle Scholar
Veldman, JW, Putz, FE (2010) Long-distance dispersal of invasive grasses by logging vehicles in a tropical dry forest. Biotropica 42:697703 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00647.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venable, DL, Brown, JS (1988) The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy, and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments. Am Nat 131:360384 10.1086/284795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, PM, D’Antonio, CM, Loope, LL, Westbrooks, R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Sci 84:468478 Google Scholar
Wainwright, CE, Cleland, EE (2013) Exotic species display greater germination plasticity and higher germination rates than native species across multiple cues. Biol Invasions 15:22532264 10.1007/s10530-013-0449-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, CE, Wolkovich, EM, Cleland, EE (2012) Seasonal priority effects: implications for invasion and restoration in a semi-arid system. J Appl Ecol 49:234241 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02088.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, RJ, Wright, JP, Bradford, MA (2011) The putative niche requirements and landscape dynamics of Microstegium vimineum: an invasive Asian grass. Biol Invasions 13:471483 10.1007/s10530-010-9842-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidlich, EWA, Flórido, FG, Sorrini, TB, Brancalion, PHS (2020) Controlling invasive plant species in ecological restoration: a global review. J Appl Ecol 57:18061817 10.1111/1365-2664.13656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinig, C (2000) Differing selection in alternative competitive environments: shade-avoidance responses and germination timing. Evolution 54:124136 Google ScholarPubMed
Wijayratne, UC, Pyke, DA (2012) Burial increases seed longevity of two Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae) subspecies. Am J Bot 99:438447 10.3732/ajb.1000477CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, JL, Fishman, L (2014) Genetic evidence for founder effects in the introduced range of houndstongue (Cynoglossum officinale). Biol Invasions 16:205216 10.1007/s10530-013-0514-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, LK, Kristiansen, P, Sindel, BM, Wilson, SC, Shaw, JD (2016) Quantifying the seed bank of an invasive grass in the sub-Antarctic: seed density, depth, persistence and viability. Biol Invasions 18:20932106 10.1007/s10530-016-1154-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, CA, Hakkenberg, AD, Beauchamp, VB (2018) Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci for invasive wavyleaf basketgrass, Oplismenus undulatifolius (Poaceae). Appl Plant Sci 6:e1016 10.1002/aps3.1016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, S, Zhao, Y, Yan, J, Peng, Z, Zhang, W, Zhang, Y, Han, Y, Wang, J, Chang, J, Xu, K (2023) Light availability and anthropogenic stress shape plant understory invasions in understory of urban forests: a case study in Shanghai. Biol Invasions 25:32233236 10.1007/s10530-023-03104-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C, Willis, CG, Burghardt, LT, Qi, W, Liu, K, de Moura Souza-Filho, PR, Ma, Z, Du, G (2014) The community-level effect of light on germination timing in relation to seed mass: a source of regeneration niche differentiation. New Phytol 204:496506 10.1111/nph.12955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P, Li, B, Wu, J, Hu, S (2019) Invasive plants differentially affect soil biota through litter and rhizosphere pathways: a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 22:200210 10.1111/ele.13181CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W, Chen, X, Liu, R, Song, X, Liu, G, Zou, J, Qian, Z, Zhu, Z, Cui, L (2022) Realized niche shift associated with Galinsoga quadriradiata (Asteraceae) invasion in China. J Plant Ecol 15:538548 10.1093/jpe/rtab086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison of light intensity (mean ± SE) in the growth room experimental conditions and representative field locations where Oplismenus undulatifolius is established.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Germination patterns of Oplismenus undulatifolius seeds collected in different years (indicated by color) under four light levels for 25 d. Lines indicate total percentage of seeds germinated across three replicate plates for each collection year × light level combination. Light levels: , 0 shade layers; , 1 shade layer; , 2 shade layers; , 3 shade layers.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Comparison of total average percent germination in Oplismenus undulatifolius seeds collected across years. Means (± SE) of percent germinated for all seeds per collection year, pooled across light treatment levels. Bars with unique letters are significantly different from one another (P < 0.05). n = 12 replicate plates per collection year.

Figure 3

Table 2. Two-way ANOVA for effects of light level and seed age on Oplismenus undulatifolius seed germination after 25 d under controlled growth room conditions.

Supplementary material: File

Pham and Wu supplementary material

Table S1

Download Pham and Wu supplementary material(File)
File 14.2 KB