Skip to main content Accessibility help

Competitive Effect of Two Nonnative Grasses on a Native Grass in Southern Arizona

  • Jason M. Stevens (a1) and Jeffrey S. Fehmi (a1)


Invasive buffelgrass, potentially invasive natalgrass, and the native grass Arizona cottontop were evaluated for their competitive response to one another in southern Arizona. Targets and neighbors were transplanted in a full-factorial randomized complete-block design consisting of nine pairwise combinations and each species alone (n = 120). Plant pairs were separated by 5 cm and allowed to grow during the 2007 monsoon season (101 d). Aboveground biomass, reproduction, and Arizona cottontop water-potential data were collected. Buffelgrass neighbors reduced aboveground biomass production and reproductive output significantly more than did intraspecific neighbors (P < 0.05), whereas natalgrass neighbors did not significantly affect Arizona cottontop biomass production or reproductive output (P > 0.05). Cottontop and buffelgrass had no significant effect on natalgrass biomass. Similarly, cottontop and natalgrass neighbors had no neighbor effect on the biomass of buffelgrass. Arizona cottontop plants that neighbored buffelgrass averaged a significantly lower water-potential value of −3.18 MPa (P < 0.05), compared with −1.17, −0.93, and −1.32 MPa for control plants (i.e., those with no neighbor), intraspecific neighbors, and natalgrass neighbors, respectively. Although buffelgrass competitive ability is consistent with its invasiveness when grown with native Arizona cottontop, natalgrass was an intermediate competitor. This suggests that natalgrass is less of a competitive threat to native perennial grasses than buffelgrass, but that it may be more tolerant to resource depletion (i.e., the presence of buffelgrass) relative to Arizona cottontop.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail:


Hide All
Aguiar, M. R., Lauenroth, W. K., and Peters, D. P. 2001. Intensity of intra- and interspecific competition in coexisting shortgrass species. J. Ecol 89:4047.
[AZMET] Arizona Meteorological Network 2007. Tucson Station. Accessed: January 20, 2008.
Bean, T. M., Smith, S. E., and Karpiscak, M. M. 2004. Intensive revegetation in Arizona's hot desert: the advantages of container stock. Native Plants J 5:173180.
Biedenbender, S. H., McClaran, M. P., and Roundy, B. A. 2003. Effects of neighbor species and distance on 2- and 4-year survival of Lehmann lovegrass and native grasses. Pages 149153. In McClaran, M. P., Ffolliott, P. F., and Edminster, C. B., tech. coord. Santa Rita Experimental Range: 100 Years (1903 to 2003) of Accomplishments and Contributions; conference proceedings. Tucson, AZ USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station RMRS-P-30.
Búrquez-Montijo, A., Miller, M. E., and Martínez-Yrízar, A. 2002. Mexican grasslands, thornscrub, and the transformation of the Sonoran Desert by invasive non-native buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare). Pages 126146. In Tellman, B. Invasive Non-native Species in the Sonoran Region. and Arizona–Sonora Desert Museum. Tucson, AZ University of Arizona Press.
Cable, D. R. 1969. Competition in the semidesert grass–shrub type as influenced by root systems, growth habits, and soil moisture extraction. Ecology 50:2738.
Canfield, R. H. 1948. Perennial grass composition as an indicator of condition of Southwestern mixed grass ranges. Ecology 29:190204.
Clarke, P. J., Latz, P. K., and Albrecht, D. E. 2005. Long-term changes in semi-arid vegetation: invasion of a non-native perennial grass has larger effects than rainfall variability. J. Veg. Sci 16:237248.
Corbin, J. and D'Antonio, C. M. 2004. Effects of invasive species on soil nitrogen cycling: implications for restoration. Weed Technol 18:14641467.
Cox, J. R., Martin, M. H. M. H., Ibarra, F. A., Fourie, J. H., Rethman, N. F. G., and Wilcox, D. G. 1988. The influence of soils on the distribution of four African grasses. J. Range Manag 41:127139.
Daehler, C. C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien plants: Implications for conservation and restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 34:183211.
D'Antonio, C. M. and Chambers, J. 2006. Using ecological theory to manage or restore ecosystems affected by invasive plant species. Pages 260279. In Falk, D., Palmer, M., and Zedler, J. Foundations of Restoration Ecology. Covelo, CA Island.
D'Antonio, C. M. and Vitousek, P. M. 1992. Biological invasions by non-native grasses, the grass fire cycle, and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 23:6387.
Davis, M. A., Grime, J. P., and Thompson, K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invisibility. J. Ecol 88:528534.
Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. and Smith, S. E. 2004. Nitrogen effects on Arizona cottontop and Lehmann lovegrass seedlings. J. Range Manag 57:7681.
Goldberg, D. E. 1990. Components of resource competition in plant communities. Pages 2765. In Grace, J. B. and Tillman, D. Perspectives on Plant Competition. San Diego, CA Academic.
Goldberg, D. E. and Landa, K. 1991. Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. J. Ecol 79:10131030.
Huddleston, R. T. and Young, T. P. 2004. Spacing and competition between planted grass plugs and preexisting perennial grasses in a restoration site in Oregon. Restor. Ecol 12:546551.
Humphreys, L. R. 1967. Buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) in Australia. Trop. Grassl 1:123–34.
Jackson, J. 2005. Is there a relationship between herbaceous species richness and buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris)? Austral Ecol 30:505–17.
Lonsdale, W. M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invisibility. Ecology 80:15221536.
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F. A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl 10:689710.
McClaran, M. P. 2003. A century of vegetation change on the Santa Rita Experimental Range. Pages 1633. In McClaran, M. P., Ffolliott, P. F., and Edminster, C. B., tech. coord. Santa Rita Experimental Range: 100 Years (1903 to 2003) of Accomplishments and Contributions; conference proceedings. Tucson, AZ USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station RMRS-P-30.
McIvor, J. G. 2003. Competition affects survival and growth of buffel grass seedlings—is buffel grass a colonizer or an invader? Trop. Grassl 37:176181.
Rossiter, N. A., Setterfield, S. A., Douglas, M. M., and Hutley, L. B. 2003. Testing the grass-fire cycle: Alien grass invasion in the tropical savannas of northern Australia. Divers. Distrib 9:169–76.
Scholander, P. F., Hammel, H. T., Hemmingsen, E. A., and Bradstreet, E. D. 1964. Hydrostatic pressure and osmotic potential in leaves of mangroves and some other plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 52:119125.
Shea, K. and Chesson, P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol 17:170176.
[SRER] Santa Rita Experimental Range 2008. Southwest precipitation data, 1922 to 2006. Santa Rita Experimental Range precipitation records. Tucson, AZ University of Arizona. Accessed: February 2, 2008.
Stevens, J. M. and Fehmi, J. S. 2009. Early establishment of a native grass reduces the competitive effect of a non-native grass [published online ahead of print August 6, 2009]. Rest. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00565.x.
Stoleson, S. H., Felger, R. S., Ceballos, G., Raish, C., Wilson, M. F., and Burquez, A. 1998. Recent history of natural resource use and population growth in northern Mexico. Pages 5286. In Jean-Luc, E., Gerardo-Ceballos, C., and Felger, R. S. Biodiversity, Ecosystems, and Conservation in Northern Mexico. New York Oxford University Press.
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture 2008. Web Soil Survey. Pima County, AZ. Accessed: June 16, 2008.
Vitousek, P. M. 1990. Biological invasions and ecosystem processes—toward an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57:713.
[WRCC] Western Regional Climate Center 2008. Tucson University of Arizona Precipitation Data, 1894 to 2006. Western Regional Climate Center Precipitation Records. Reno, NV Desert Research Institute. Accessed: February 2, 2008.


Competitive Effect of Two Nonnative Grasses on a Native Grass in Southern Arizona

  • Jason M. Stevens (a1) and Jeffrey S. Fehmi (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed