Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Augmentative Restoration: Repairing Damaged Ecological Processes During Restoration of Heterogeneous Environments

  • Roger L. Sheley (a1), Jeremy J. James (a1) and Erin C. Bard (a2)

Abstract

Heterogeneity in disturbance regimes, propagule pools, and factors affecting plant performance are a ubiquitous feature of wildlands. We tested a conceptual framework, termed augmentative restoration, aimed at identifying and selectively repairing or replacing damaged processes based on their predicted influence on the three causes of succession: site availability, species availability, and species performance. This framework was tested at three sites each with a different cause of succession naturally occurring in an ephemeral wetland dominated by invasive plants that had varying levels of disturbance (site availability), remnant native plants (species availability), and water availability (species performance). Our hypotheses were (1) seeding combined with watering would augment meadow vole disturbance to increase desired species composition, (2) shallow tilling combined with watering would augment remnant native species, and (3) shallow tilling combined with seeding would augment mesic soils to increase desired species composition. Shallow tilling, watering, and seeding were applied in a factorial arrangement at all three sites. These eight treatment combinations were applied in a split-plot design with four replications to generate 32 whole plots (2 m2). The herbicide 2,4-D was applied on half of each whole plot to influence relative species performance. In two of the three sites, using augmentative restoration to guide our management approaches improved our decision as to the treatment combinations that would maximize seedling establishment. Selectively augmenting successional processes that remain intact by repairing or replacing processes occurring at inadequate levels can improve implementation of successional management and provide a refined process-based framework for restoration across heterogeneous landscapes. Besides the clear economic advantages of lower management inputs associated with augmentative restoration, avoiding unnecessary management inputs has the additional advantage of minimizing unintended negative impacts on ecosystem processes.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: roger.sheley@oregonstate.edu

References

Hide All
Bard, E. C., Sheley, R. L., and Jacobsen, J. S. 2003. Using ecological theory to guide augmentative restoration (Montana). Ecol. Restor 21:143144.
Bard, E. C., Sheley, R. L., Jacobsen, J. S., and Borkowski, J. J. 2004. Using ecological theory to guide the implementation of augmentative restoration. Weed Technol 18:12461249.
Benton, T. G., Vicery, J. A., and Wilson, J. D. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key. Trends Ecol. Evol 18:182188.
Berlow, E. L., D'Antonio, C. M., and Reynolds, S. A. 2002. Shrub expansion in montane meadows: the interaction of local-scale disturbance and site aridity. Ecol. Appl 12:11031118.
Burke, M. J. W. and Grime, J. P. 1996. An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77:776790.
Burnett, M. R., August, P. V., Brown, J. H., and Killingbeck, K. T. 1998. The influence of geomorphological heterogeneity on biodiversity. I. A patch-scale perspective. Conserv. Biol 12:363370.
Bussan, A. J. and Dyer, W. E. 1999. Herbicide and rangeland. Pages 116132. in Sheley, R. L. and Petroff, J. K., editors. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Press.
Davis, E. 1990. Spotted Knapweed (Centuarea maculosa Lam.) Seed Longevity, Chemical Control and Seed Morphology. Masters thesis. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University. 109.
DeSimone, S. A. and Zedler, P. H. 1999. Shrub seedling recruitment in unburned Californian coastal sage scrub and adjacent grassland. Ecology 80:20182032.
Duggin, J. A. and Gentle, C. B. 1998. Experimental evidence on the importance of disturbance intensity for invasion of Lantana camara L. in dry rainforest-open forest. For. Ecol. Manage 109:279292.
Foster, B. L., Dickson, T. L., Murphy, C. A., Karel, I. S., and Smith, V. H. 2004. Propagule pools mediate community assembly and diversity-ecosystem regulation along a grassland productivity gradient. J. Ecol 92:435449.
Fuhlendorf, S. D. and Engle, D. M. 2004. Application of the fire-grazing interaction to restore a shifting mosaic on tallgrass prairie. J. Appl. Ecol 41:604614.
Gordon, T. A., Derksen, D. A., Blackshaw, R. E., Van Acker, R. C., Légère, A., Watson, P. R., and Turnbull, G. C. 2004. A multistudy approach to understanding weed population shifts in medium- to long-term tillage systems. Weed Sci 52:874880.
Gross, K. L. 1980. Colonization by Verbascum thapsus (Mullein) in an old field in Michigan: experiments on the effects of vegetation. J. Ecol 68:919927.
Gross, K. L., Mittelbach, G. G., and Reynolds, H. L. 2005. Grassland invasibility and diversity: responses to nutrients, seed input, and disturbance. Ecology 86:476486.
Halle, S. and Fattorini, M. 2004. Advances in restoration ecology: insights from aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Pages 1033. in Temperton, V. M., Hobbs, R. J., Nuttle, T., and Halle, S., editors. Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice. Washington, DC Island.
Harris, G. A. 1967. Some competitive relationships between Agropyron spicatum and Bromus tectorum . Ecol. Monogr 37:89111.
Huenneke, L. F., Hamburg, S. P., Koide, R., Mooney, H. A., and Vitousek, P. M. 1990. Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in Californian serpentine grassland. Ecology 71:478491.
Huston, M. A. 1994. Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press. 704.
Jones, S., Wraith, J. M., and Or, D. 2002. Time domain reflectometry measurement principles and applications. Hydrol. Processes 16:141153.
Kedzie-Webb, S. A., Sheley, R. L., and Borkowski, J. J. 2002. Predicting plant community response to picloram. J. Range Manage 55:576583.
Kindscher, K. and Tieszen, L. L. 1998. Floristic and soil organic matter changes after five and thirty-five years of native tallgrass prairie restoration. Restor. Ecol 6:181196.
Légère, A. and Samson, N. 2004. Tillage and weed management effects on weeds in barley–red clover cropping systems. Weed Sci 52:881885.
Li, Y. C. and Norland, M. 2001. The role of soil fertility in invasion of Brazilian pepper (Schinus terabinthfolius) in Everglades National Park, Florida. Soil Sci 166:400405.
Loreau, M., Mouguet, N., and Gonzalez, A. 2003. Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecology 100:1276512770.
Ludwig, J. A. and Tongway, D. J. 1995. Spatial organization of landscapes and its function in semi-arid woodlands, Australia. Landscape Ecol 10:5163.
Luken, J. 1990. Directing Ecological Succession. New York Chapman and Hall. 264.
Mosley, J. C., Bunting, S. C., and Manoukian, M. E. 1999. Cheatgrass. Pages 175188. in Sheley, R. L. and Petroff, J. K., editors. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Press.
Mueggler, W. F. and Stewart, W. L. 1980. Grassland and shrubland habitat types of western Montana. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report Int-66, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 154.
Patten, R. S. and Ellis, J. E. 1995. Patterns of species and community distributions related to environmental gradients in an arid tropical ecosystem. Vegetation 17:6979.
Pickett, S. T. A. and Cadenasso, M. L. 1995. Landscape ecology: spacial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269:331334.
Pickett, S. T. A. and Cadenasso, M. L. 2005. Landscape ecology: spacial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269:331334.
Pickett, S. T. A., Collins, S. L., and Armesto, J. J. 1987. Model, mechanisms, and pathways of succession. Bot. Rev 53:335371.
Popova, A. Y. 1960. Centaurea diffusa Lam, a steppe pasture weed in the Crimea (English Translation). Botanicheskiy Zhurnal 45:12071213.
Radosevich, S. R., Holt, J. S., and Gharsa, C. M. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. New York J Wiley and Sons. 608.
Rebollo, S., Perez-Camacho, L., Valenia, J., and Gomez-Sal, A. 2003. Vole mound effects and disturbance rate in a Mediterranean plant community under different grazing and irrigation regimes. Plant Ecol 169:227243.
Schlesinger, W. H., Raikes, J. A., Hartley, A. E., and Cross, A. F. 1996. On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology 77:364374.
Seabloom, E. W., Borer, E. T., Boucher, V. L., Burton, R. S., Cottingham, K. L., Goldwasser, L., Gram, W. K., Kendall, B. E., and Micheli, F. 2003. Competition, seed limitation, disturbance, and reestablishment of California native annual forbs. Ecol. Appl 13:575592.
Sheley, R. L., Hook, P. B., and LeCain, R. 2006a. Establishment of native and invasive plants along a rangeland riparian gradient. Ecol. Restor 24/3:173181.
Sheley, R. L., Jacobs, J. S., and Lucas, D. E. 2001. Revegetating spotted knapweed infested rangeland in a single entry. J. Range Manage 54:576583.
Sheley, R. L., Jacobs, J. S., and Svejcar, T. J. 2005. Integrating disturbance and colonization during rehabilitation of invasive weed-dominated grasslands. Weed Sci 53:307314.
Sheley, R. L., Jacobs, J. S., and Velagala, R. P. 1999. High seeding rates enhance intermediate wheatgrass establishment in spotted knapweed infested rangeland. J. Range Manage 52:6773.
Sheley, R. L. and Krueger-Mangold, J. 2003. Principles for restoring invasive plant infested rangeland. Weed Sci 51:260265.
Sheley, R. L. and Larson, L. L. 1994. Observation: comparative life history of cheatgrass and yellow starthistle. J. Range Manage 47:450456.
Sheley, R. L., Mangold, J. M., and Anderson, J. L. 2006b. Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive-plant-dominated rangeland. Ecol. Monogr 76/3:365379.
Sheley, R. L., Svejcar, T. J., and Maxwell, B. D. 1996. A theoretical framework for developing successional weed management strategies on rangeland. Weed Technol 10:766773.
Temperton, V. R., Hobbs, R. J., Nuttle, T., and Halle, S. 2004. Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice. Washington, DC Island. 424.
Tilman, D. 1990. Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58:315.
Turnbull, L. A., Crawley, M. J., and Rees, M. 2000. Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88:225238.
Vandvik, V., Heegaard, E., Maren, I., and Aarrestand, P. 2005. Managing heterogeneity: the importance of grazing and environmental variation on post-fire succession in heathlands. J. Appl. Ecol 42:139149.
Werner, P. 1999. Reflections on “mechanistic” experiments in ecological restoration. Pages 321328. in Jordan, W. R. III, Gilpin, M. E., and Aber, J. D., editors. Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
Whisenant, S. G. 1999. Repairing Damaged Wildlands: A Process Oriented, Landscape-Scale Approach. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press. 328.

Keywords

Augmentative Restoration: Repairing Damaged Ecological Processes During Restoration of Heterogeneous Environments

  • Roger L. Sheley (a1), Jeremy J. James (a1) and Erin C. Bard (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed