Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Liberal Social Reconstruction and the Resolution of Civil Wars in Central America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2003

Get access

Abstract

The international community, in its efforts to overcome the security dilemmas that inhibit conflict resolution, need not always offer forceful security guarantees to combatants in civil wars. We argue that noncoercive, liberal international intervention can end civil wars. As suggested by a constructivist perspective and the insights of the democratic peace, the promotion of liberal democracy can successfully resolve civil wars by transforming the identities and institutions of the combatants. We develop this argument by examining the resolution of civil wars in Central America during the 1990s. Of the Central American cases, Nicaragua, the country subject to the strongest security guarantees, has been the least stable of the three. El Salvador and Guatemala, in contrast, have experienced more successful conflict resolution despite the lack of any forceful security guarantees by the international community. The termination of these civil wars can be best explained by the adherence of local actors to liberal democratic norms and institutions in response to a variety of international pressures and opportunities.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Arnson, Cynthia. 1993. Crossroads: Congress, the President, and Central America, 1976–1993. University Park, Pa.: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Arévalo de León, Bernardo. 1998. Sobre arenas movedizas: Sociedad, estado y ejército en Guatemala. 1997. Guatemala: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert. 1993. Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Baldwin, David A., 85115. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 1997. Bringing in the New World Order: Liberalism, Legitimacy, and the United Nations. World Politics 49 (4):526–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Michelle, and Kugler, Jacek. 1998. Power Parity, Democracy, and the Severity of Internal Violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (2):196209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Lalman, David. 1992. War and Reason. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Call, Charles, and Stanley, William. 1999. A Sacrifice for Peace? Security for the General Public During Implementation of Peace Agreements. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1991. In the Name of Democracy: U.S. Policy Toward Latin America During the Reagan Years. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Castañeda, Jorge. 1994. Utopia Unarmed: The Latin American Left After the Cold War. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Central America Update. 1992. Nicaragua: Update on Developments Related to Suspension of U.S. Aid Disbursement. 11 September. Guatemala City: Inforpress.Google Scholar
Child, Jack. 1992. The Central American Peace Process: Sheathing Swords, Building Confidence. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Cousens, Elizabeth. 1999. From Missed Opportunities to Overcompensation: Implementing Bosnia's Dayton Agreement. Unpublished manuscript, International Peace Academy, New York.Google Scholar
Dillon, Samuel. 1991. Commandos: The CIA and Nicaragua's Contra Rebels. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Dosal, Paul J. 1995. Power in Transition: The Rise of Guatemala's Industrial Oligarchy, 1871–1994. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1983. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs: Part 1. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 12 (3):205–35.Google Scholar
Dunkerley, James. 1994. The Pacification of Central America. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Dye, David R., Butler, Judy, Abu-Lughod, Deena, and Spence, Jack, with Vickers, George. 1995. Contesting Everything, Winning Nothing: The Search for Consensus in Nicaragua, 1990–1995. Cambridge, Mass.: Hemisphere Initiatives.Google Scholar
Farer, Tom, ed. 1996. Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas. Baltimore Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization. 52 (4):887918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de El Salvador, Fuerza Armada and ONUSAL. 1994a. Relaciones civiles-militares en el nuevo marco international. San Salvador: FAES and ONUSAL (División de Derechos Humanos).Google Scholar
de El Salvador, Fuerza Armada and ONUSAL. 1994b. Doctrina militar y relaciones ejercito/sociedad. San Salvador: FAES and ONUSAL (División de Derechos Humanos).Google Scholar
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor 1991. Election Cycles and War. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 35 (2):212–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, Tom, and Smyth, Frank. 1990. El Salvador: Is Peace Possible?. Washington, D.C.: Washington Office on Latin America.Google Scholar
Goodfellow, William, and Morrell, James. 1992. Esquipulas: Politicians in Command. In Political Parties and Democracy in Central America, edited by Goodman, Louis W., LeoGrande, William M., and Forman, Johanna Mendelson, 267–87. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gramajo Morales, Héctor. 1989. Tesis de la estabilidad nacional. Guatemala: Editorial del Ejercito.Google Scholar
Gramajo Morales, Héctor. 1997. Political Transition in Guatemala, 1980–1990: A Perspective from Inside Guatemala's Army. In Democratic Transitions in Central America, edited by Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lindenberg, Marc, 111–38. Gainesville: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1993. Minorities at Risk. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute for Peace Press.Google Scholar
Hernández Alarcón, Rosalinda. 1998. La tierra en los acuerdos de paz: Resumen de la respuesta gubernamental. Guatemala: Inforpress Centroamericana.Google Scholar
Holiday, David, and Stanley, William. 1993. Building the Peace: Lessons from El Salvador. Journal of International Affairs 46 (2):415–38.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch Americas. 1994. Nicaragua: Separating Fact from Fiction: The Work of the Tripartite Commission in Nicaragua. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics. 30 (2):186214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kenneth Lance. 1993. Between Revolution and Democracy: Business Elites and the State in El Salvador During the 1980s. Ph.D. diss., Tulane University.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Ian. 1995. Rights and Reconciliation: UN Strategies in El Salvador. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry. 1988. Exporting Democracy: The Unanticipated Effects of U.S. Electoral Policy in El Salvador. In Crisis in Central America: Regional Dynamics and U.S. Policy in the 1990s, edited by Hamilton, Nora, Fuller, Linda, Frieden, Jeffry A., and Pastor, Manuel Jr173–91. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kowert, Paul, and Legro, Jeffrey. 1996. Norms, Identity, and Their Limits: A Theoretical Reprise. In The Culture of National Security, edited by Katzenstein, Peter, 451–97. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, Anthony. 1993. From Containment to Enlargement. U.S. State Department Dispatch. 4 (39), 27 September. Available at ⟨dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/briefing/Dispatch/4no39.htm⟩.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1992. Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War. American Political Science Review 86 (l):2437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A., and Rothchild, Donald. 1996. Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict. International Security. 23 (2):4175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan, and Stepan, Alfred. 1997. Toward Consolidated Democracies. In Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies. Volume 1, Themes and Perspectives, edited by Diamond, Larry, Plattner, Marc F., Chu, Yun-han, and Tien, Hung-mao, 1433. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, Shelley A. 1996. ONUVEN: Toward a Model for Electoral Observation. Paper presented at conference “Peacemaking and Democratization in the Hemisphere: Multilateral Approaches,” North-South Center, 11–13 April, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
Miles, Sara, and Ostertag, Bob. 1989. D'Aubuisson's New ARENA. NACLA Report on the Americas 23 (2):1438.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Tommie Sue. 1993. Armed Struggle and Popular Resistance in El Salvador: The Struggle for Peace. In The Latin American Left, edited by Carr, Barry and Ellner, Steve. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Moravscik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization. 51 (4):513–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Campbell, Sally. 1991. Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War: So Why Kant Democracies Fight? Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (2):187211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Volume 4, Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Oneal, John, and Russett, Bruce. 1997. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985. International Studies Quarterly. 41 (2):267–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paige, Jeffery M. 1997. Coffee and Power: Revolution and the Rise of Democracy in Central America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Paris, Roland. 1997. Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism. International Security. 22 (2):5489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peceny, Mark. 1999. Democracy at the Point of Bayonets. University Park, Pa.: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R. 1993. The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict. In Ethnic Conflict and International Security, edited by Brown, Michael E., 103–24. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 1998. Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization. 52 (3):613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, William I. 1996. Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, U.S. Intervention, and Hegemony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, Herman. 1992. El Papel de la Asistancia de AID en el Fortalecimiento de Nuevas Instituciones del Sector Privado y en la Transformación Global de la Economía Salvadoreña: El Caso FUSADES. Paper presented at the 17th Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, September, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Rothchild, Donald. 1999. Implementation and Its Effects on Building and Sustaining Peace: The Effects of Changing Structures of Incentives. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neoutilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52 (4):855–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schirmer, Jennifer. 1998. The Guatemalan Military Project: A Violence Called Democracy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell, and Macías, Ricardo Cordova. 1995. El Salvador, de la guerra a la paz: una cultural política en transición. [San Salvador]: IDELA; [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1996. Transnational Advocacy Networks, Human Rights, and Democracy in Latin America. Paper presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 29 August –1 September, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel. 1998. Regional Orders at Century's Dawn. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spalding, Rose J. 1996. Nicaragua: Politics, Poverty, and Polarization. In Constructing Democratic Governance: Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean in the 1990s, edited by Domínquez, Jorge I. and Lowenthal, Abraham E., 324. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Spalding, Rose J. 1999. From Low-Intensity War to Low-Intensity Peace: The Nicaraguan Peace Process. In Comparative Peace Processes in Latin America, edited by Arnson, Cynthia J., 3164. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Spence, Jack, Dye, David R., Worby, Paula, de León-Escribano, Carmen Rosa, Vickers, George, and Lanchin, Mike. 1998. Promise and Reality: Implementation of the Guatemalan Peace Accords. Cambridge, Mass.: Hemisphere Initiatives.Google Scholar
Stanley, William. 1999. Building New Police Forces in El Salvador and Guatemala: Learning and Counter-learning. International Peacekeeping 6 (4): 113–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, William, and Call, Charles. 1997. Building a New Civilian Police Force in El Salvador. In Rebuilding Societies After Civil Wars: Critical Roles for International Assistance, edited by Kumar, Krishna, 107–33. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Stanley, William, and Holiday, David. 1997. Peace Mission Strategy and Domestic Actors: United Nations Mediation, Verification, and Institution Building in El Salvador. International Peacekeeping 4 (2):2249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, William. 2000. Everyone Participates, No One Is Responsible: Peace Implementation in Guatemala. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Stanley, William, and Loosle, Robert. 1998. Peace and Public Insecurity: The Civilian Police Component of Peace Operations in El Salvador. In Policing the New World Disorder: Peace Operations and the Public Security Function, edited by Oakley, Robert. Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press.Google Scholar
Stedman, Stephen John. 1997. Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes. International Security. 22 (2):553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesón, Fernando. 1996. Changing Perceptions of Domestic Jurisdiction and Intervention. In Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas, edited by Farer, Tom, 2951. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Torres-Rivas, Edelberto. 1996. Encrucijadas e Incertezas en la Izquierda Centroamericana. Guatemala: FLACSO.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1995. The United Nations and El Salvador, 1990–1995. United Nations Blue Book Series Vol. 4. New York: UN Public Documents.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1998a. The Guatemalan Peace Agreements. New York: UN Department of Public Information. (The accords are also available at ⟨http://www.usip.org/library/pa/index/pa_guatemala.html⟩).Google Scholar
United Nations. 1998b. Fifty Years of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations: 1948–1998. Available at ⟨http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/pk50.htm.⟩.Google Scholar
Valdéz, J. Fernando, and Prado, Mayra Palencia. 1998. Los dominios del poder: la encrucijada tributaria. Guatemala: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 1997. The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement. International Organization. 51 (3): 335–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 1999. Designing Transitions from Civil War: Demobilization, Democratization, and Commitments to Peace. International Security. 24 (1):127–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Weiss-Fagen, Patricia. 1996. El Salvador: Lessons in Peace Consolidation. In Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas, edited by Farer, Tom, 213–37. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1994. Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review 88 (2):384–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Daniel H. 1992. ARENA in the Arena: Factors in the Accommodation of the Salvadoran Right to Pluralism and the Broadening of the Political System. LASA Forum 23 (1): 1018.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth. 1996. Economic Structure, Agrarian Elites, and Democracy: The Anomalous Case of El Salvador. Unpublished manuscript, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth. 1999. Civil War Settlement: Modeling the Bases of Compromise. Paper presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 2–5 September, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth. 2000. Forging Democracy from Below: Insurgent Transitions in South Africa and El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1998. World Development Report: Knowledge for Development. Washington, D.C.: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 217 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-898fc554b-4dk4j Total loading time: 0.336 Render date: 2021-01-26T13:29:29.992Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Liberal Social Reconstruction and the Resolution of Civil Wars in Central America
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Liberal Social Reconstruction and the Resolution of Civil Wars in Central America
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Liberal Social Reconstruction and the Resolution of Civil Wars in Central America
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *