Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T07:17:08.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Labor History and Public History: Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

Thomas Miller Klubock
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Paulo Fontes
Affiliation:
Fundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro

Extract

Labor history and public history have had a long relationship in the United States, as James Green argues in Taking History to Heart, dating back to Progressive-era historians like Mary Ritter and Charles A. Beard. Labor historians like Phillip Foner, who identified with the “Old Left,” made labor history public history through ties to labor organizations and the Communist Party. Then, during the 1960s, historians identified with the “New Left” and inspired by E.P. Thompson, worked to extend social history and working-class history “from the bottom up” beyond the confines of the academy, even as they shifted their focus from the institutional histories of unions and political parties, to make the history of “ordinary people” and “everyday life” public history. The organization of history workshops and the proliferation of oral history projects reflect the ways in which historians of the working class made their practices public history in new ways during the 1960s and 1970s while expanding the sphere of both “the public” and “labor” to include histories of women, gender and patriarchy, and ethnic and racial minorities.

Type
Labor History and Public History
Copyright
Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)