Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T08:10:21.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of Capture-Recapture Models for Estimating Coffee Stemborer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Abundance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Jianing Wei  and
RongPing Kuang
Jianing Wei
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32 Jiao Chang Dong Road, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, The People's Republic of China
RongPing Kuang
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32 Jiao Chang Dong Road, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, The People's Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

The population of coffee stemborers (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) was estimated at six sites in south-west China using two capture-recapture models. Two sampling methods (simple and systematic random sampling), each at three sampling intensities (10, 20 and 30%) were employed for two-time capture attempts from which the capture-recapture estimates were calculated. Estimates from the models were compared with that of census data from the fields. When sampling intensity was 20%, satisfactory levels of accuracy were obtained using the two models. The level of accuracy of the estimates increased as damage rate and mean density of the insect increased. Accuracy was also increased with increasing the sampling intensity, when damage rate and density of stemborers in the plots were low.

Résumé

La population de foreurs de tige du caféier (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) a été évaluée sur six sites au sud de la Chine, par utilisation des modèles de capture et recapture. Deux méthodes d'échantillonnage (une méthode simple et une autre de randomisation systématique), chacune d'elles comportant trois niveaux d'intensité d'échantillonnage (10, 20 et 30%), ont été employées lors de deux essais de capture à partir desquels on a calculé les taux de captures et recaptures. Les résultats d'estimation obtenus à partir des deux modèles étaient comparés à ceux enregistrés dans les champs. A l'intensité d'échantillonnage de 20%, on obtenait des niveaux satisfaisants de précision pour les deux modèles. Les niveaux de plus de précision allaient de pair avec l'augmentation du taux de dégâts et de la densité moyenne des insectes. De même, les niveaux de précision croissaient en fonction de l'augmentation de l'intensité d'échantillonnage au moment où les taux de dégâts et la densité des foreurs étaient encore bas dans les parcelles.

Keywords

capture-recapture modelcoffee stemborerspopulation samplingChinamodèle de capture et recaptureforeurs de tige du caféieréchantillonnage de populationsChine
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 39 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brian, T. F. and Monica, L. T. (1996) Mark-release-recapture estimates of Reticulitermes spp. (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) colony forging populations from Georgia, USA. Environ. Entomol. 25, 952–962.Google Scholar
Darroch, J. N. (1958) The multiple-recapture census, 1. Estimation of a closed population. Biometrika 45, 343–359.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. and Davidson, S. E. (1960) Techniques for capture-recapture studies of Lepidoptera population. J. Lepidopterists' Soc. 14, 227–229.Google Scholar
Gary, N. E. (1971) Magnetic retrieval of ferrous labels in a capture recapture systemfor honeybees and other insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 64, 961–965.Google Scholar
Horn, H. S. (1976) A clamp for marking butterflies in capture-recapture studies. J. Lepidopterists' Soc. 30, 145–146.Google Scholar
Kuang, R. P. and Yu, X. W. (1997) A study on the structure and temporal-spatial attacking traits of coffee stem-borer population in Simao region. Zoological Research 18, 33–38.Google Scholar
Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C. and Anderson, D. R. (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62, 1–135.Google Scholar
Pollock, K. H. (1975) Building models of capture-recapture experiments. The Statistician 25, 253–260.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (1985) SAS user's guide: statistics, version 5 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Shao, Ch. B., Zhou, J. X. and Wang, R. S. (1991) The application of capture-recapture model for estimating pest occurrence. Statistic and Management 4, 31–36.Google Scholar
Shao, Ch. B., Huang, L., Chen, H. and Zh, J. X. (1995) Study on estimating model and sampling method of the occurrence quantity of poplar longicorn. J. Northwest Forestry College 10, 40–46.Google Scholar
Sonlcitner, F. J. and Biteman, M. A. (1963) Mark-recapture analysis of a population of Queensland fruit-fly Dacus tryoni (Frogg.) in an orchard. J. Anim. Ecol. 32, 259–269.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. (1978) Ecological Methods With Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
Sprott, D. A. (1980) Maximum likelihood and small samples: Estimation in the presence of nuisance parameters. Biometrika 67, 515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. A. and Smith, F. F. (1955) Three methods for extracting thrips and other insects from rose flowers. J. Econ. Entomol. 48, 767–768.Google Scholar
Thorne, B. L., Estelle, R. C., Brian, T. F. and James, F. A. T. (1996) Evaluation of mark-release-recapture methods for estimating forager population size of subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinatermitidae) colonies. Environ. Entomol. 25, 938–951.Google Scholar
Wong, Ch. S. and McDonald, J. F. (1987) Confidence intervals for a population size based on a capture-recapture model. Communication in Statistics—Theory and Methods 16, 79–91.Google Scholar
Wood, G. W. (1963) The capture-recapture techniques as a means of estimating populations of climbing cut worms. Can. J. Zool. 41, 47–50.Google Scholar