Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:40:55.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Broadband frequency reconfigurable printed transceivers for microwave imaging systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2022

Ankita Malhotra*
Affiliation:
Electronics and Telecommunications Department, R.G.I.T, Mumbai, India
Ananjan Basu
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Research in Electronics, IIT, Delhi, India
*
Author for correspondence: Ankita Malhotra, E-mail: ankitakec52224@gmail.com

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel method for obtaining wideband spectral information of the target in microwave imaging systems by using broadband frequency reconfigurable printed transceivers. The proposed transceiver is composed of two embedded stacked microstrip antenna configurations operating in C-band (5.5–8.5 GHz) and X-band (8.5–11.5 GHz) with each having 3 GHz bandwidth. The transceiver switches between the two configurations (and thus frequency bands) using PIN diodes and collects response of the antenna in the presence of the target, in both the operating bands. This information is then combined to obtain wideband spectral information of the target from 5.5 to 11.5 GHz to achieve improved image reconstruction. The proposed reconfigurable transceiver has advantage over traditional broadband transceivers (those have slots/meandering at ground plane to achieve wideband response) that it has unidirectional radiation patterns throughout its band of operation. Hence the imaging system is implemented without the absorbers. This keeps the system compact and inconspicuous when installed for security applications. Here, a bistatic system is employed with two-dimensional target scanning performed in a real outdoor environment.

Type
Microwave Measurements
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amineh, RK, Ravan, M, Trehan, A and Nikolova, NK (2011) Near-field microwave imaging based on aperture raster scanning with TEM horn antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 59, 928940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rezaeieh, SA, Zamani, A and Abbosh, AM (2015) 3-D wideband antenna for head-imaging system with performance verification in brain tumor detection. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 14, 910914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobashsher, AT and Abbosh, AM (2016) Performance of directional and omni-directional antennas in wideband head imaging. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 15, 16181621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, E, Kirshin, E, Santorelli, A, Coates, M and Popović, M (2013) Time domain multistatic radar system for microwave breast screening. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 12, 229232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, E, Bahrami, H, Santorelli, A, Gosselin, B, Rusch, LA and Popović, M (2016) A wearable microwave antenna array for time-domain breast tumor screening. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 35, 15011509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, HB, Nhung, NTT, Li, E-P and Thang, ND (2008) Confocal microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: delay-multiply-and-sum image reconstruction algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 55, 16971704.Google ScholarPubMed
Fear, EC, Sill, J and Stuchly, MA (2003) Experimental feasibility study of confocal microwave imaging for breast tumor detection. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 51, 887892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalilvand, M, Li, X, Zwirello, L and Zwick, T (2015) Ultra wideband compact near-field imaging system for breast cancer detection. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 9, 10091014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geffrin, JM, Eyraud, C and Litman, A (2015) 3-D imaging of a microwave absorber sample from microwave scattered field measurements. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 25, 472474.Google Scholar
Semenov, SY, Bulyshev, AE, Abubakar, A, Posukh, UG, Sizov, YE, Souvorov, AE, Van den Berg, PM and Williams, TC (2005) Microwave tomographic imaging of the high dielectric contrast objects using different image reconstruction approaches. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 53, 22842294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elboushi, A and Sebak, A (2014) MMW sensor for hidden targets detection and warning based on reflection/scattering approach. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 62, 48904894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskandari, MR, Dehmollaian, M and Safian, R (2014) Experimental investigation of factorization method as a qualitative approach for near-field microwave imaging. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 13, 289292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malyuskin, O and Fusco, V (2014) Near field enhancement and sub-wavelength imaging using resonantly loaded apertures. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 62, 31303140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charvat, G, Temme, A, Feigin, M and Raskar, R (2015) Time of flight microwave camera. Scientific Reports 5, Article no. 14709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridges, JE (1998) Non-invasive system for breast cancer detection. U.S. Patent 5 704 355, Jan. 6, 1998.Google Scholar
Hagness, SC, Taflove, A and Bridges, JE (1998) Two-dimensional FDTD analysis of a pulsed microwave confocal system for breast cancer detection: fixed focus and antenna-array sensors. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 45, 14701479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, D, Meaney, PM and Paulsen, KD (2003) Conformal microwave imaging for breast cancer detection. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 51, 11791186.Google Scholar
Meaney, PM, Fanning, MW, Li, D, Poplack, SP and Paulsen, KD (2000) A clinical prototype for active microwave imaging of the breast. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 48, 18411853.Google Scholar
Paul, S, Chugh, R and Akhtar, MJ (2019) Microwave synthetic aperture radar imaging using SFCW system for buried object detection and security applications. IEEE International Microwave and RF Conference (IMaRC 2019) INSPEC Accession Number, 19691580, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randazzo, A, Ponti, C, Feeling, A, Estatico, C, D'Atanasio, P, Pastorino, M and Schettini, G (2021) A two-step inverse-scattering technique in variable-exponent Lebesgue spaces for through-the-wall microwave imaging: experimental results. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 59, 71897200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shao, W, Edalati, A, McCollough, TR and McCollough, WJ (2018) A time-domain measurement system for UWB microwave imaging. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 66, 22652275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, T, Shen, F, Xu, K, Tang, Z, Wang, J, Zhang, B, Ye, D, Huangfu, J, Li, C and Ran, L (2019) Microwave imaging customized on demand under random field illumination. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 67, 11481156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, AA and Basu, A (2018) Miniaturised distributed transceivers for far-field microwave imaging. IEEE International Microwave and RF Conference (IMaRC-2018), Dec. 2018, pp. 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, WK (2005) The Electrical Engineering Handbook. Academic Press, pp. 671675.Google Scholar
Katyal, A and Basu, A (2017) Analysis and optimisation of broadband stacked microstrip antennas using transmission line model. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 11, 8191.Google Scholar
Pasterino, M (2010) Microwave Imaging. John Wiley and Sons. Inc. Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, RW (2011) What is a Savitzky – Golay filter?. Lecture Notes. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.CrossRefGoogle Scholar