Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:35:31.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Airborne passive location based on combined time and frequency difference of arrival

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Gaetano Severino*
Affiliation:
ELETTRONICA S.p.A. Via Tiburtina Valeria Km 13.700, 00131, Rome, Italy. Phone: +(39) 064154 – [608, 573, 932]; Fax: +(39) 064154932
Antonio Zaccaron
Affiliation:
ELETTRONICA S.p.A. Via Tiburtina Valeria Km 13.700, 00131, Rome, Italy. Phone: +(39) 064154 – [608, 573, 932]; Fax: +(39) 064154932
Riccardo Ardoino
Affiliation:
ELETTRONICA S.p.A. Via Tiburtina Valeria Km 13.700, 00131, Rome, Italy. Phone: +(39) 064154 – [608, 573, 932]; Fax: +(39) 064154932
*
Corresponding author: Gaetano Severino Email: gaetano.severino@elt.it

Abstract

Passive location techniques have always been considered an important topic and recently, thanks to digital signal processing (DSP) advances, new methods are being studied and experimented with. The possibility to passively locate radar emitters avoiding transmission is crucial in a variety of military applications, in particular when a flying platform (aircraft or helicopter) is entering an unknown and potentially hostile area. Elettronica SpA (ELT) gave start in 2004 to an experimental campaign in this field with the support and collaboration of the Italian Ministry of Defence (MoD). In this context the following activities were carried out:

  • theoretical study (with analytically derived and simulated results) of a passive location algorithm,

  • design and development of a passive location demonstrator (PLD) qualified for flight,

  • field tests (July 2006) performed in Sardegna (Salto di Quirra).

This paper presents the specific passive location algorithm selected for the field tests illustrating analytical performance prediction. The PLD and the field tests are described and the main results are reported. A location accuracy in the order of 10% of emitter distance has been achieved during experimentation.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2009. Published by Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Becker, K.An efficient method of passive emitter location. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., AES-28 (1992), 10911104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Levanon, N.Interferometry against differential Doppler: performance comparison of two emitter location airborne. IEE Proc., 136 (1989), 7074.Google Scholar
[3]Chestnut, P.C.Emitter location accuracy using TDOA and differential Doppler. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., 18 (1982), 214218.Google Scholar
[4]Deng, X.P.; Liu, Z., Jiang, W.L.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Xu, Y.W.Passive location method and accuracy analysis with phase difference rate measurements. IEE Proc. Radar Sonar Navig., 146 (2001), 302307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Skolnik, M.Radar Handbook. McGraw-Hill Editions, New York 1990.Google Scholar
[6]Rife, D.C.Single-tone parameter estimation from discrete-time observations. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, IT-20 (1974), 591598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Wiley, R.G.Electronic Intelligence: the Interception of Radar Signals, Artech House Editions, Dedham 1985.Google Scholar
[8]Tsui, J.Digital Techniques for Wide Band Receivers, Artech House Editions, Norwood 2001.Google Scholar
[9]Poisel, R.A.Electronic Warfare Target Location Methods, Artech House Editions, Boston 2005.Google Scholar