Book chapters will be unavailable on Saturday 24th August between 8am-12pm BST. This is for essential maintenance which will provide improved performance going forwards. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.
5.Meier, Deborah, “‘Getting Tough’ In the Schools,” Dissent (Winter1984):61–70; and Ravitch, and Meier, , “A Debate on Education…,” 225–228.
6.Meier, , “A Debate on Education…,”228. Ravitch objects vigorously to Meier's critique, which, she claims, quotes her inaccurately and distorts her meaning. (As one who has documented Ravitch's distortions of his own work, I cannot suppress a gleeful chuckle at her discomfort. How the chickens come home to roost.) See, Katz, Michael B., “An Apology for American Educational History: a Review of Diane Ravitch,” The Revisionists Revised, Harvard Educational Review, 49, 2 (1979). Although Meier did not quote accurately in some places and did leave the impression that Ravitch was more explicit about some of her views than she was, she is right about the thrust of the story. Ravitch cannot escape the implications of her version of history by hiding behind an illusory cloud of historical objectivity.
Recommend this journal
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.