Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T11:26:30.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterizations of right Nakayama rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

Manabu Harada
Manabu Harada
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Osaka City University, Sugimoto-3, Sumiyosi-Ku, Osaka 558, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have studied relationships between almost relative projectivity and Nakayamaings [8]. In this paper we shall further investigate certain characterizations of right Nakayama rings in terms of almost relative projectives (or injectives). We shall consider three conditions (A), (B) and (C) (see Section 1), which are always satisfied for the relative projective modules, but not for almost relative projectives in general. As an application of [9, Theorem] and [10, Theorem 2], we shall show that a right artinian ring is right Nakayama if and only if one of the above three conditions holds true for almost relative projectives (Corollary to Theorem 1). Moreover we shall give a characterization of two-sided Nakayama rings related to (C) and the dual (C#) (Theorem 2). Finally we shall investigate the transitivity of almost relative projectives, which is the converse of (B), and give some characterizations of right Nakayama rings related to the transitivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 91 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1992

References

REFERENCES

1.Albu, T. and Nastasescu, C., Relative finiteness in module theory, Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics 84 (Marcel Dekker, 1984).Google Scholar
2.Azumaya, G., Mbuntum, F. and Varadarajan, K., On M-projective and M-injective modules, Pacific J. Math. 59 (1975), 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Fuller, K. R., On indecomposable injectives over artinian rings, Pacific J. Math. 29 (1969), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Baba, Y., Note on almost M-injectives, Osaka J. Math. 26 (1989), 687–698.Google Scholar
5.Baba, Y. and Harada, M., On almost relative projectives and injectives, Tsukuba Math. J. 14 (1990), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Harada, M., Uniserial rings and lifting properties, Osaka J. Math. 19 (1982), 217–229.Google Scholar
7.Harada, M., Generalization of Nakayama ring III, Osaka J. Math. 23 (1986), 523–539.Google Scholar
8.Harada, M. and Tozaki, A., Almost M-projectives and Nakayama rings, J. Algebra 122 (1989), 447–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Harada, M., On almost relative projectives over perfect rings, Osaka J. Math. 27 (1990), 465–482.Google Scholar
10.Harada, M., On almost relative injectives on artinian modules, Osaka J. Math. 27 (1990), 963–971.Google Scholar
11.Harada, M. and Mabuchi, T., On almost M-projectives, Osaka J. Math. 26 (1989), 837–848.Google Scholar
12.Harada, M., Hereditary rings and almost relative projectives, to appear.Google Scholar
13.Oshiro, K., Semiperfect modules and quasi-semiperfect modules, Osaka J. Math. 20 (1983), 337–373.Google Scholar
14.Sumioka, T., Tachikawa's theorem on algebras of left colocal type, Osaka J. Math. 21 (1984), 629–648.Google Scholar
15.Sumioka, T., On artinian ring of right local type, Math. J. Okayama Univ. 29 (1987), 127–146.Google Scholar
16.Wisbauer, R., Grundlagen der Modul- und Ringtheorie. Ein Handbuch für Studium and Forschung (Reinhard Fischer, 1988).Google Scholar