Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T04:32:53.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-chromosomal heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

A. N. Wilton  and
J. A. Sved
A. N. Wilton
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, N.S.W. 2006, Australia
J. A. Sved
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, N.S.W. 2006, Australia

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Population cages were set up containing an X-chromosome balancer, and either a single wild-type chromosome(homozygous cages) or a mixture of wild-type chromosomes(heterozygous cages). The balancer chromosome was eliminated more rapidly from the heterozygous cages, indicating that chromosome heterozygotes are at an advantage over chromosome homozygotes. The disadvantage of X-chromosome homozygosity in the female is estimated to be about 40%. From earlier studies it is known that the average disadvantage of homozygosity for either of the two major autosomes of D. melanogaster is approximately 80%. Since these autosomes are both about twice as long as the X chromosome, the disadvantage per unit length is similar for both chromosomal types.

Both X-chromosomal and autosomal heterosis can be explained by either dominance or overdominance at individual loci. However, a dominance model can only explain the similarity if many of the X-linked loci (about 50%) are limited in expression to the female.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , December 1979 , pp. 303 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

References

REFERENCES

Bennett, J. H. (1958). The existence and stability of selectively balanced polymorphisms at a sex-linked locus. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 11, 598–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundgaard, J. & Christiansen, F. B. (1972). Dynamics of polymorphisms. I. Selection components in an experimental population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 71, 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, J. F. (1948). Alternative hypotheses of hybrid vigor. Genetics 33, 477–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Crozier, R. H. (1976). Why male-haploid and sex-linked genetic systems seem to have unusually sex-limited mutational genetic loads. Evolution 30, 623–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drescher, W. (1964). The sex limited genetic load in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. American Naturalist 98, 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1926). A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection: Part III. Proceedings of Cambridge Philosophical Society 23, 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, M. G., Kidwell, J. F. & Sved, J. A. (1977). Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: A syndrome of aberrant traits including mutation, sterility and male recombination. Genetics 86, 813–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C. C. (1955). Population Genetics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindsley, D. L. & Grell, E. H. (1968). Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Institute Washington Publication, no. 627.Google Scholar
Mourão, C. A., Ayala, F. J. & Anderson, W. W. (1972). Darwinian fitness and adaptedness in experimental populations of Drosophila willistoni. Genetica 43, 552–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prout, T. (1965). The estimation of fitnesses from genotypic frequencies. Evolution 19, 546–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperlich, D. & Karlik, A. (1970). The genetic conditions in heterozygous and homozygous populations of Drosophila. I. The fate of alien chromosomes. Genetica 41, 265–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sved, J. A. (1971). An estimate of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 18, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sved, J. A. (1975). Fitness of third chromosome homozygotes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 25, 197–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sved, J. A. & Ayala, F. J. (1970). A population cage test for heterosis in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 66, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temin, R. G. (1966). Homozygous viability and fertility loads in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 53, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tracey, M. L. & Ayala, F. J. (1974). Genetic load in natural populations: Is it compatible with the hypothesis that many polymorphisms are maintained by natural selection? Genetics 77, 569–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed