Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T15:02:36.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation of Mental Health Case Management Fidelity in a Geographically Small Country

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

P. Mateus
Affiliation:
National Programme for Mental Health, Health Directorate General, Lisbon, Portugal
A. Carvalho
Affiliation:
National Programme for Mental Health, Health Directorate General, Lisbon, Portugal
J.M. Caldas de Almeida
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
M. Xavier
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
1.Introduction

Strategies to implement evidence-based practices are critical to improve services. There are many barriers to their implementation, despite all available knowledge. Even geographically small countries like Portugal (92.152 km2)can have substantial regional variations in evidence-based practices implementation.

2.Objectives

Evaluate the regional variation of mental health case management fidelity during a systematic implementation process, according to the measurement of techniques and resources used by mental health professionals.

3.Methods

The study was carried out at public and private mental health services in mainland Portugal. The implementation process started with a case management course, in which mental health professionals were trained by means of guidelines, demonstrative videos, scenarios and role-playing. Implementation fidelity was assessed by the Illness Management Fidelity Scale (Mueser, 2009).

4.Results

Mental health professional’s assessment in 26 mental health public and private services (n=71) showed that there are significant differences in the proportion of case management adequate implementation between country regions (North = 35,7% / Centre = 57,5 / Lisbon and Tagus Valley = 65,3%, Alentejo 72,7% and Algarve = 50%).

5.Conclusion

The results show that even in a geographically small country there are big differences in the quality and degree of effective practices implementation. This happens despite the fact that the implementation process was developed nationwide by the same training and implementation team, working with regional groups.

Locally and regionally designed implementation programs are needed to balance the unevenness of evidence based practices fidelity and quality.

Type
Article: 1386
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.